100 likes | 813 Views
Influenza Testing: Update & Recommendations for Point-of-Care Testing. Gary Overturf, M.D. Professor, Pediatric Infectious Diseases & Pathology Medical Director, Infectious Diseases TriCore Reference Laboratories. Diagnostic Tests for Influenza.
E N D
Influenza Testing: Update & Recommendations for Point-of-Care Testing Gary Overturf, M.D. Professor, Pediatric Infectious Diseases & Pathology Medical Director, Infectious Diseases TriCore Reference Laboratories
Diagnostic Tests for Influenza • Serology: Acute & convalescent specimens and/or IgG and IgM; 14 – 28 days; retrospective diagnosis. • Primary Culture: NP, throat or nasal wash; cell culture in MKC (VERO and MRC-5) & embryonated hens eggs: 5 to 10 days. • “Accelerated Culture”(e.g. Shell vial); 48-72 hrs • Flourescent Antibody (FA; DFA) :TAT 24 hours. • Rapid testingin the Virology Laboratory: - Flourescent antibody staining (e.g. DFA): 1 to 4 days - RT-PCR: TAT 2-4 hours after arrival in laboratory; practical time for conventional resporting: 24 hours
Examples of Point-of-Care Tests for:Influenza A and B Infections • Point-of-Care Tests: < 15 minutes Directigen EZ Flu A (BD) A+B QuickVue (Quidel) A&B Flu OIA (Thermo BioStar) A&B ZstatFlu (Zyme Tx) A&B BinaxNOW (Inverness) A&B TRU FLU (Meridian) A&B XPECT Flu (Remel) A&B • Some approved for nasal wash; some NP swab; others both • Range in cost of test = ~ $10 - $35, direct cost.
Reliability of POC Testing for Influenza • CDC Evaluation: detection of novel-H1N1 (MMWR August 6, 2009). • Sensitivities: Quickvue 69%; Directigen EZ 49%; BinaxNOW 40% (overall range = 49 – 69%) • Previous Studies; range = 10 – 51% • Positive tests are reliable; negative tests, not reliable. • Due to limited sensitivities of POC tests, interpretation of the test results should be done with care. • FALSE NEGATIVES ARE COMMON!
Utility of Influenza Testing • During seasonal influenza, 5% -~ 10% of patients visiting physicians offices may have influenza but 20% – 50% may have respiratory symptoms. • Therefore, a minimum of ~ 5 - 20 patients would need to be tested for every true positive assuming a ~ 50% sensitivity; adds $10 - $20 cost/patient tested. When the need to know is high; duplicate FA testing adds $25– $35/patient. • Only patients testing positive are candidates for antivirals if within 48 – 72 hrs of symptom onset. However, currently, only high risk patients, pregnant women and young children or seriously ill (e.g. hospitalized) are considered candidates for treatment.
Recommendations for Influenza Viral Testing • Check current respiratory viral activity at TriCore web site (www.TriCore.org). Patients with ILI likely reflect infection with the prevalent community strain(s); most clinical decisions can be made with ILI plus a knowledge of the current viral epidemiology. • Screen with FA with valid laboratory testing (85 – 90% sensitivity); test only those patientswho are candidatesfor treatment/prophylaxis, or those to behospitalized. H1N1-novel RT-PCR should be ordered only for surveillance (DOH State is free with long TAT; TriCore will offer at charge). • POC Testing is not cost effective and does not benefitclinical decision making.
FDA Advice on Rapid Influenza Testing • When influenza activity is low, positives should be confirmed by DFA or RT-PCR; false positives are more likely • During influenza peak activity, falsenegatives are more likely; negative tests may not rule out influenza • None of the tests provide identification of other H-subtypes (H1, H2, H3, H5, H7, H9); FA does! • The tests have much lower sensitivity for adults than children because children shed more virus
Additional FDA AdviceRE: Influenza Testing • Test sensitivities & specificities cannot be compared across package inserts • The performance of any rapid test using frozen samples may likely show greater sensitivity • Inadequate or inappropriate specimen collection, storage & transport are likely to yield false negative tests • Predictive values of individual tests will depend on the level of influenza activity, the types of virus circulating, age of patients and adequacy of collection
Data Synopsis from the FDAThroat/Nasal Swabs or NP Wash • Influenza A, Throat Swabs: Pediatric Sens 65-90% Spec 81-91% Adult Sens 24-91% Spec 69-94% • Influenza A, Nasopharyngeal Wash Pediatric Sens 82-95% Spec 98-100% Adult Sens 53-87% Spec 90-100% • Influenza A & B, Nasal Swab Not Specified Sens 65-87% Spec 87-97%