280 likes | 618 Views
6 Lectures on Morality. 11/10: What is morality and how does it work?11/17: The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion 11/24: The positive moral emotions: Elevation, awe, admiration, and gratitude
E N D
1. The dark side: Why moral psychology is the greatest source of evil Jonathan Haidt
University of Virginia
3. Morality as harm reduction:
4. Morality is..... Fairness/
Justice
5. Morality re-defined: “Moral systems are interlocking sets of values, virtues, norms, practices, identities, institutions, technologies, and evolved psychological mechanisms that work together to suppress or regulate selfishness and make social life possible” (Haidt, in press, Handbook of social psych)
6. Keeping together in time, fascist
8. Three Models of Human Nature
9. The Cynical View Be warned that if you wish, as I do, to build a society in which individuals cooperate generously and unselfishly towards a common good, you can expect little help from biological nature. Let us try to teach generosity and altruism, because we are born selfish.
--Dawkins, The Selfish Gene
10. The Rationalist View At the heart of this tradition is a twofold intuition about human beings: namely, that all, just by being human, are of equal dignity and worth... , and that the primary source of this worth is a power of moral choice within them, a power that consists in the ability to plan a life in accordance with one's own evaluation of ends... [Political theory should be based on] the conception of human beings as essentially rational agents.
---Nussbaum, 1999, p. 57
11. Tis not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger.... (Hume, Treatise)
The ultimate ends of human actions can never, in any case, be accounted for by reason, but recommend themselves entirely to the sentiments and affections of mankind. (Hume, Enquiry)
The Intuitionist View
13. Three Models of Human Nature
14. Three Models of Human Nature
15. The Intuitionist view 1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)
2) Moral thinking is for social doing
3) Morality binds and builds
4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness
16. The Social Intuitionist Model (Haidt, 2001)
17. Sympathy ...sympathy...forms an essential part of the social instinct, and is indeed its foundation-stone.--Darwin, Descent
The play of sympathy and antipathy is a sufficient cause for practical reason to become conscious of reciprocity. --Piaget, Moral Judgment of the Child
18. Psychic Numbing (Slovic)
19. How should we value lives?
20. How should we value lives?
21. How might we value lives?
22. How DO we value lives?
23. The collapse of compassionSmall, Loewenstein, & Slovic, 2006
24. The collapse of compassionSmall, Loewenstein, & Slovic, 2006
25. The collapse of compassionSmall, Loewenstein, & Slovic, 2006
26. The collapse of compassionKogut & Ritov, 2005 Mean contributions to help 1 sick child, or to help the whole group of 8 sick children
27. The collapse of compassionVastfjall, Peters, & Slovic, in prep Compassion and charity decline at 2!
28. It is a terrible thing to admit, but the more information we consume about Darfur, the less shocking each piece of new information seems. And surely that is a part of the problem. Ignorance is not the only ally of indifference; sometimes knowledge, too, blunts the heart and the will.
--Richard Just, 2008, review of books about Darfur
29. If I look at the mass, I will never act. If I look at one, I will. –Mother Teresa.
30. Three Models of Human Nature
31. 1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)
2) Moral thinking is for social doing
3) Morality binds and builds
4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness The Intuitionist view
32. A) Hypocrisy --How can you say to your brother, "Let me remove the speck from your eye”; and look, a plank is in your own eye? Hypocrite! First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye. (Jesus)
--Clean your finger before you point at my spots. (Ben Franklin)
--Though you see the seven defects of others, we do not see our own ten defects (Japanese Proverb)
--A he-goat doesn’t realize that he smells. (Nigerian Proverb)
33. FunctionalismsMoral thinking is done in order to... 1. Feel good. (Intrapsychic functionalism: Freud, Cialdini)
2. Find the truth. (Epistemic functionalism: Plato, Kohlberg, rationalists)
3. Succeed socially. (Social-functionalism: Darwin, Tooby, Cosmides, Dunbar)
--the “interpreter module” (Gazzaniga, 1985)
--the intuitive politician (Tetlock) and the ubiquity of hypocrisy (Batson)
34. Real politicians
35. B) Rationalization Rationalization may be defined as self-deception by reasoning. --Karen Horney
36. The Most Dangerous Rationalization “Russians may be hungry and short of clothes and comfort, but you can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs”
--Walter Duranty, 1932, in the New York Times
37. Rationalization of evil You must think of humanity as one great body, but one that requires constant surgery. Need I remind you that surgery cannot be performed without cutting membranes, without destroying tissues, without the spilling of blood? Thus we must destroy whatever is superfluous. These are unpleasant acts, granted, but we do not find any of this immoral. You see, all acts that further history and socialism are moral acts.
--Lazar Kaganovich, letter to his American nephew
38. 1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)
2) Moral thinking is for social doing
3) Morality binds and builds
4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness The Intuitionist view
39. The 6 Ultrasocial Animals Hymenoptera: Bees wasps and ants
40. The 6th Ultrasocial: Not kinship; Massive in-group cooperation for the purpose of cross-group competition. Held together by norms and emotions.
41. The Myth of Pure Evil (Baumeister, 1997)
1) The evil one is purely evil; has no intelligible motive, beyond an enjoyment of harming, or a lust for power.
2) The victim is purely good, and did nothing to bring about victimization.
3) The Evil one is an outsider, not part of our group.
4) Evil is the antithesis of order, peace, stability
5) Anyone who raises doubts about the purity of either side is in league with evil (e.g., dissent is treason)
42. Cartoon evil, 1950s
43. Parody of cartoon evil, 1990s
44. Manichaeism: the world is an eternal battle between the forces of darkness and the forces of light
45. Kids are natural manichaeans
46. Grownups too
47. Natural Born Manichaean "When I was coming up, it was a dangerous world, and you knew exactly who they were. It was us vs. them, and it was clear who them was. Today, we are not so sure who the they are, but we know they're there.“
--GWB, January 21 2000
48. "You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror.... This is an evil man that we’re dealing with” Mirrored Manichaeans:
49. The Myth of Pure Evil (Baumeister, 1997)
1) The evil one is purely evil; has no intelligible motive, beyond an enjoyment of harming, or a lust for power.
2) The victim is purely good, and did nothing to bring about victimization.
3) The Evil one is an outsider, not part of our group.
4) Evil is the antithesis of order, peace, stability
5) Anyone who raises doubts about the purity of either side is in league with evil (e.g., dissent is treason)
50. A) The Causes of Terrorism Americans are asking, why do they hate us? They hate what we see right here in this chamber -- a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms -- our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.
--G. W. Bush, Address to Congress, 9/20/01
51. Many people, many motives (Victoroff, 2005)
52. Many people, many motives (Victoroff, 2005)
53. Traditional Psychological Approaches A) Psychopathology? [No]
B) Rational choice? [for govt. yes; bomber no]
C) Psychoanalytic theories, [little support]
D) Sociological theories? e.g., Social learning, Frustration-aggression, Relative deprivation, Oppression [little support]
E) Group Process theories: T is the product of “group psych within idiosyncratic subcultures that coalesce in reaction to circumstances they perceive as intolerable” [yes]
54. Morality binds, builds, & kills “In too simple terms, terrorists kill for the same reasons that groups have killed other groups for centuries. They kill for cause and comrades, that is, with a combination of ideology and intense small-group dynamics.” --McCauley (2002)
--9/11 hijackers were not motivated by hate--Atta’s manual has no hate--Anger is background of intergroup conflict, within which martyrdom becomes a moral ideal--Men on martyrdom mission are (encouraged to be) holy minded and tightly bonded
55. The history of suicide terrorism --Zealots of Judea: objected to Roman control, provoked Jewish revolt of ’66 ; extremist subgroup, the “sicarii” carried out assassinations, killed Jewish collaborators, killed Jewish opponents of war, went on suicide missions against Romans. Backfired: Jews expelled from Judea.
--Shiite Assassins: attacks and suicide attacks on Sunni rulers of their territory in N.W. Iran, 11th and 12th C.
--Japanese Kamikazes: only in the last 10 months of WWII, when Japanese territory was threatened
--ST disappears from 1945-1980
--Revived by Hezbollah in Lebanon, 1980s, against US, French, and Israeli forces in Lebanon. It worked
56. Robert Pape, Dying to Win “Few suicide attackers are social misfits... most fit a nearly opposite profile… They see themselves as sacrificing their lives for the nation’s good.”
“The bottom line, then, is that suicide terrorism is mainly a response to foreign occupation…. Modern suicide terrorism is best understood as an extreme strategy for national liberation against democracies with troops that pose an imminent threat to control the territory the terrorists view as their homeland.”
Suicide Terrorism is a form of altruistic suicide, like bees stinging a fist punched into the hive
57. B) Fascism
58. Making the nation a hive
59. Mussolini, “The Doctrine of Fascism” “Fascism sees in the world not only those superficial, material aspects in which man appears as an individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the individual but the nation and the country; individuals and generations bound together by a moral law, with common traditions and a mission which suppressing the instinct for life closed in a brief circle of pleasure, builds up a higher life, founded on duty, a life free from the limitations of time and space, in which the individual, by self-sacrifice, the renunciation of self-interest, by death itself, can achieve that purely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consists.”
60. Morality re-defined: “Moral systems are interlocking sets of values, virtues, norms, practices, identities, institutions, technologies, and evolved psychological mechanisms that work together to suppress or regulate selfishness and make social life possible” (Haidt, in press, Handbook of social psych)
61. 1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)
2) Moral thinking is for social doing
3) Morality binds and builds
4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness The Intuitionist view
62. Racism as moral judgment Naive racism and anti-racism
--The world is full of good people and bad people
--Shared hatred of evil binds us together
--Group X is evil
--Group X = Jews, Blacks, Communists, Gays,
Child-abductors, Drug-dealers/users, Muslims
--For liberals, group X = racists, who are responsible for racism; our hatred of them binds us together
63. Prejudice as non-moral error A) Displaced aggression
B) Authoritarian personality
C) Cognitive errors/biases, illusory correlations
D) Implicit associations, picked up from the media
E) Ingroup-outgroup dynamics (Jane Elliot’s blue-eyes and brown-eyes)
F) Stereotype accuracy?
64. Racist Jeopardy Round 1 A: These people are cheap, greedy, pushy, clannish, wealthy
Q: Who are the Chinese (in Indonesia), the Indians (in East Africa), the Copts (in Egypt)?
More generally: “Middlemen” or trading sub-cultures (including Jews in Europe)
65. A: These people are lazy, violent, superstitious, unintelligent, musical, and religious, and they speak colorfully
Q: Who are the Irish? (in Boston, c.1840)
More generally: Impoverished peasant sub-cultures (including rural Southern Blacks)
Racist Jeopardy Round 2
66. How liberalism became a dirty word --Jews and Italians of Brooklyn flee old neighborhoods
--1972, threat of forced busing of Brownsville Blacks into Canarsie; Canarsians derided as racist for resisting
--Rieder: Canarsians were racist, but that is not a full explanation
-- “Black crime and family breakdown was real; the high life was so highly visible...”
69. Traditional Morality: Uses every tool in the toolbox to increase MCC
70. Ghetto culture violates all 5, for Canarsians
71. Racism is (in part) a moral judgment that liberalism condemns as the greatest possible sin -- “Law and order is not as simple as a code word for racism; it is a cry as things begin to break up, for stability, for stopping history in mid dissolution.”
--”For Canarsians, [Liberalism] had become associated with profligacy, spinelessness, malevolence, masochism, elitism, fantasy, anarchy, idealism, softness, irresponsibility, and sanctimoniousness.”
73. Racism and the Myth of Pure Evil
1) The racist is purely evil; has no intelligible motive, beyond an enjoyment of harming, or a lust for power.
2) The victim is purely good, and did nothing to bring about victimization.
3) The racist is an outsider, not part of our group.
4) Racism is the antithesis of order, peace, stability
5) Anyone who raises doubts about the purity of either side is in league with evil (e.g., justifying racism is treason)
74. The Moral Psych Alternative: Racism/Prejudice almost invariably involve moral judgments, mostly based on the Ingroup, Authority, and Purity foundations
75. Social Group Attitudes
76. Social Group Attitudes
77. Social Group Attitudes
78. Social Group Attitudes
79. Social Group Attitudes
80. Social Group Attitudes
81. Social Group Attitudes
82. Social Group Attitudes
83. Social Group Attitudes
84. 1) Intuitive primacy (but not dictatorship)
2) Moral thinking is for social doing
3) Morality binds and builds
4) Morality is about more than harm and fairness The Intuitionist view
85. “One of this book’s aims is to replace the thin, mechanical psychology of the enlightenment with something more complex, something closer to reality. A consequence of this is to produce a darker account. But another aim of the book is to defend the enlightenment hope of a world that is more peaceful and more humane, the hope that by understanding more about ourselves we can do something to create a world with less misery.
--Glover, p. 7 Conclusions/implications
86. Three Models of Human Nature