1 / 3

The Evolution of MSF's Grower Cane Price Risk Management Offering

How MSF's Grower Cane PRM Offering changed over time.

Crimmo
Download Presentation

The Evolution of MSF's Grower Cane Price Risk Management Offering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The evolution of MSF’s Grower Cane Price Risk Management Offering • Initially, when Mulgrave and Maryborough were separate entities:- • Cane Pay Sugar and Mill Margin Sugar was notionally separated into two pools in the Maryborough region • A grower Target Price Committee made ICE11 pricing decisions on behalf of the Maryborough growers both in advance of and during the season • Management made ICE11 pricing decisions on behalf of MSF • In the Mulgrave region there was a single ICE11 pricing pool for both miller and growers • Management made ICE11 pricing decisions for all pool participants (largely during the season) • Soon after acquiring Mulgrave, the Maryborough system described above was introduced • MSF sought to evolve its offering to cater for individual grower pricing • An extensive review of QSL’s offering followed • Mulgrave and Maryborough Target Price Committee members provided guidance • A number of opportunities for improvement and customisations for our growing regions were identified • As the offering evolved a Grower Reference Panel consisting of representatives from each region’s Target Price Committees was formed with the view to streamlining the process by ensuring a single point of reference • The Grower Reference Panel provided extensive feedback and the opportunity for continuing visibility as finer details were worked through • Once finalised, MSF’s Improved Pricing and Pooling Model (IPPM) was introduced to Mulgrave and Maryborough growers • The IPPM has been well received by growers as evidenced by the low number that chose QSL’s offering (1% in the Maryborough region and 10% in the Mulgrave region) • The IPPM has now been implemented and is operational • MSF has purchased a data capture and pool management system (Visual Risk) • Recruitment for a Pool Manager and Grower Services Officer has commenced 1

  2. MSF’s Grower Cane Price Risk Management Offering as it is today Growers are able to spread cane price risk between a number of ICE11 pricing pools including:- • Pools that manage sugar price and currency risk in advance of the season (Forward Pricing Pools) and ones that manage these risks during the season (In-season Pricing Pools). Within the pricing pool categories described above (Forward and In-season) growers are able to:- • Make AUD equivalent ICE11 pricing decisions themselves • Have someone else (e.g. MSF or a grower Target Price Panel) make decisions on their behalf • Participate in pools that do not involve quantity obligations 2

  3. Available pools

More Related