1 / 16

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE National Conference & Educational Workshop June 11-14, 2002 Phoenix, Arizona Presented by: Wayne A. Johnson Science Applications International Corporation Huntsville, Alabama wayne.a.johnson@saic.com Background

Gabriel
Download Presentation

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE National Conference & Educational Workshop June 11-14, 2002 Phoenix, Arizona Presented by: Wayne A. Johnson Science Applications International Corporation Huntsville, Alabama wayne.a.johnson@saic.com

  2. Background • NASA Space Launch Initiative (SLI) • Managed by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center • $4.85B FY02-FY06 • Reusable Vehicle Concepts • Lower Technical/Business Risks • Increase Safety/Reliability • Technology Development • 22 Contracts Let Spring 2001 SLI overview animation

  3. FY06 FY99 FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 Phase 2 Concept Development / Risk Reduction / Advanced Development Phase 1 Concept Definition and Risk Reduction STAS Program Milestones Focused Architecture Selections Program ATP IAR SRR FSD Requirements Definition and Tool Development NRA Cycle II Procurement (NRA8-30 and In-House) 8-27 NRA 8-30 Award for TA1 NRA8-30 Release Base Award Option 1 NRA 8-30 Awards TA2-9 Base Award Option 1 Option 2 (TA 2-9 as appropriate) NRA 8-30 Awards for TA-10 Flight Demonstrations Base Award Option 1 Option 2 RFP Release ATP RFP Development Preliminary Design and Advanced Development SLI Schedule Courtesy: NASA

  4. Stakeholder Perspectives StakeholderIssues • Industry • - Launch Providers • - Payload Manufacturers • Government • ISS Support • Crew Rotation • Logistics • Asset Deployment/Recovery • Reconnaissance • Financiers/Backers • Bankers • Brokers • - Insurers Architecture Size Market Demand Launch Price Safety/Reliability Replacement $ < Shuttle $ Launch Price Safety/Reliability Return on Investment Risk

  5. Acquisition Phase • DDT&E Costs • Mission Requirements • Trade Analyses • Prototypes/Test Units • Production Costs • Lean Manufacturing • Quantities/Element • Facilities (New/Refurbish) • Booster/Orbiter/CTV Processing • Mission Operations • Runway • Location(s) • Temporal (Time Phasing) • Debt Instruments • Private/Public Debt • Internal • Government Loans/Guarantees • Interest Rate Time

  6. Operations Phase • Recurring • - Flight Operations • Propellants • Labor • Insurance • Non-Recurring Costs • - Ground Support Equipment • - Facilities Upgrades • Flight Rates • Quantities • Turn-Around Time • Operating Revenues • - Price/Flight • Facilities • - Mission Operations ?

  7. Advertising Recreation ISS Missions Health & Medicine Satellite Servicing Parcel Deliveries Defense Transportation/ Tourism Non- Terrestrial Mining Communications Media (TV, Movies) Applied Sciences Space Agriculture Space Business Parks Energy Earth Observation Space Based Utilities Logistics Support Data Networks On-Orbit Construction Traditional Emerging Market Considerations

  8. Market Considerations (Cont’d) • RLV Faces Competition From Expendable Launch Market • Highly Reliable Launchers • More Launch Site Choices • Worldwide Competition • Government Subsidies • TumultuousCommercial Satellite Industry • - Mergers & Acquisitions • - Regulatory Policies in Emerging Markets • Uncertainty in Broadband Market • Excess Transponder Capacity • Terrestrial Competition • Negligible RLV Market for Small and Heavy Payloads • - Micro/Small Class (< 5K Lbs.) Best Launched with Expendables • - Heavy Payloads (>25K Lbs.) Are Few; Primarily DoD • Projections for Intermediate to Large Markets Are Flat • Long Range Forecasts are Difficult • Projections Needed to 2030 Time Frame for Most Business Cases • Technology and External Influences Can Cause Wild Swings

  9. Satellite Mass Growth Trend Predicted satellite mass no greater than 20K lbs by 2020 Source: Futron, Inc.

  10. Financial Metrics • Cash Flow • The difference between incoming revenue and outgoing costs over a finite time period. • This is a good metric for insight into the amount of inflows/outflows, their rates • of increase/decrease, and provides temporal insights such as investment • recovery (break-even) time. • Discounted Cash Flow • A cash flow summary that has been adjusted to reflect the time value of money. • This concept takes into account the Present Value (PV) and Future Value (FV) • notions of financial analysis. The PV is what future money is worth in today’s terms. • Internal Rate of Return • - The the discount rate for which total present value of future cash flows equals the • cost of the investment. The IRR is a specific calculated interest rate that will • produce a Net Present Value (NPV) of zero.This is an excellent metric to use when • there is a large initial cash outlay. • Payback Period • The length of time required to recover the cost of an investment, usually measured in years. • Other things being equal, the investment with a shorter the payback time is better and are • generally considered less risky.

  11. Break-Even Point + Cash Flows 0 Acquisition Phase Operations Phase - Time Cumulative Cash Flow Profile Revenues Exceed Costs Max. Loss Exposure • Government can wait longer to recoup investments; industry has shorter time impositions • Before/After Tax profiles can differ significantly

  12. Building a Shuttle Replacement Case No Shuttle Replacement Shuttle Yearly Operations Cost RLV IOC Time • A replacement RLV system must prove to be less expensive • to operate (in the long term) than continuing Shuttle operations • Ongoing shuttle operations require safety and performance upgrades • RLV must be more reliable and safer then Shuttle

  13. A Modeling Approach Sample Data Only

  14. Sensitivity Analysis • FSD Decision in 2006; constant fleet size • Production, Facilities, Operations costs, Launch Prices held constant • Steady State Operations 5 yrs Post IOC All other factors equal, financial metrics are sensitive to acquisition costs

  15. Sensitivity Analysis • Acquisition and operations costs held constant • Constant market prices • 20 years of operation post IOC • Adequate Facility Capacity to Accommodate Higher Flight Rates As flight rate is doubled, IRR improves to a maximum of 13% over the baseline

  16. Summary • Costs • - Acquisition • - Operations • - Phasing • Revenues • - Prices • Flight Rates • - Mission Types • - Processing Times • Markets • Elasticity • Emerging • Financial Metrics • - NPV • IRR • Payback Period

More Related