1 / 12

Synthesis For CMOS/PTL Circuits

Synthesis For CMOS/PTL Circuits. Congguang Yang Maciej Ciesielski Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Sponsored by NSF. Motivation. Traditional logic synthesis (SIS) use factored forms, algebraic factorization: a(b+c)

Download Presentation

Synthesis For CMOS/PTL Circuits

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Synthesis For CMOS/PTL Circuits Congguang Yang Maciej Ciesielski Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering University of Massachusetts, Amherst Sponsored by NSF

  2. Motivation • Traditional logic synthesis (SIS) • use factored forms, algebraic factorization: a(b+c) • boolean formulas treated as polynomials: F = ac + bc + ad + bd = (a + b) (c + d) • weak Boolean factorization capability F = a + bc = (a + b)(a + c) …. cannot be found easily • good for AND/OR, difficult to identify XOR and MUX logic • Our approach • based on BDD representation of logic • truly Boolean operations, Boolean algebra rules applied: a + a = a, a * a’ =0, a * 1 = a, a * 0 = 0, etc • can easily identify XOR, MUX structures • very fast

  3. BDD-based Logic Decomposition • Observation: • BDD structure reveals functional decomposition. • Simple dominators • Algebraic AND, OR, XOR decomposition • Generalized dominators • Boolean AND, OR, XOR decomposition • Cofactor, single/super node • Simple/complex MUX • Identify Dominators (BDD structures) •  different logic decompositions

  4. F = a + bc a D = a + b Q = a + c b a a c b c 0 0 0 1 1 1 Boolean AND/OR decomposition F = a + bc = (a + b)(a + c) = *

  5. D = af + b + c Q F D D a a a a f f b b b reduce f f c c c b b b b 0 0 1 0 1 c c c c g Q d a e minimize g g 1 0 0 d d e e 1 0 1 0 DC DC Boolean AND decomposition - example F = D Q Q = ag + d + e 1. Find a cut in BDD of F 2. Create divisor D (generalized dominator), reduce D 3. Compute Q from F, minimize Q

  6. XOR Decomposition – Role of X-dominator General idea: • Identify a node (x-dominator) with complement and regular edges • Split node function into f and f’ • Compose the two parts with XOR

  7. MUX Decomposition F F 0 1 v v 0 1 g g f f F F a a c d b b c d 0 1 0 1 Complex MUX SimpleMUX • Identify exactly two nodes covering all paths to 1, 0 • Connect one node to 1, the other to 0 • Upper portion defines control h

  8. Decomposition of Multiple-output Functions • Build BDD for each output • Decompose each BDD • Construct factoring trees • Identify logic sharing

  9. Application to CMOS/PTL Logic Synthesis • Logic balancing • Reduction of long transistor chains • Fanout reduction

  10. Application to CMOS/PTL Logic Synthesis • Extract XOR’s and MUXes during BDD decomposition • Map the decomposed logic onto CMOS and PTL • Preserve XOR’s and MUXes for PTL • Use CMOS to provide buffering for PTL • New technology mapping techniques needed (tree-based mappers are inadequate) • Develop PTL cell library • (with and w/out buffers)

  11. Preliminary Results – XOR Intensive Logic • Comparison with SIS and [tsai’96] • # XOR’s: after/before technology mapping • SIS mapper used (lower cost assigned to XOR gates)

  12. Application to FPGA Synthesis • Very fast (orders of magnitude) • Good for rapid prototyping • Good results in terms of logic density and wiring • 30 – 40% improvement compared to SIS + FlowMap • Open problems: • Incremental synthesis • Specialized decomposition specifically for FPGAs

More Related