1 / 21

Transformation in the State of Oregon: A Collaborative Plan to Weather the Storm

Transformation in the State of Oregon: A Collaborative Plan to Weather the Storm. Erin Fair , MPH, JD CareOregon Sr. Manager of State & Federal Regulatory Policy. About. Medicaid & Medicare Managed Care Org. More than 155,000 OHP and Medicare Advantage members

Jimmy
Download Presentation

Transformation in the State of Oregon: A Collaborative Plan to Weather the Storm

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transformation in the State of Oregon:A Collaborative Plan to Weather the Storm Erin Fair, MPH, JD CareOregon Sr. Manager of State & Federal Regulatory Policy

  2. About • Medicaid & Medicare Managed Care Org. • More than 155,000 OHP and Medicare Advantage members • Most MA members are enrolled in SNP • 76% of members live in the Portland metro area • 54% of members are female • 59% are 19 & younger; 19% are 4 & younger • 26% do not speak English as their first language • 46% self identify as non-Caucasian

  3. Key Data – Portland Metro Area • Total Population – 1.6 Million • Medicaid + Dually Eligible – 216,400 • Uninsured ~232,000 • Annual Portland Medicaid Budget ~ $1.2 Billion (state & federal funding combined) • 11% cut to OHP budget in 2011 • Another 19% cut has been proposed in 2012 • High Medicare Advantage penetration, overall 28% of Portland pop.

  4. Portland Context • Resource withdrawal • 11% payment reduction in late 2011 • Anticipate another 19% cut in mid-2012 • In Portland that is -$230M annually, permanently • ~$115M the Inpatient and Outpatient Services; ~$115M from MD, Ancillary, Mental Health, etc. • Portland/Oregon is traditionally an efficient market • Major ‘low hanging fruit’ is picked • New innovations and tight integration & coordination necessary • Systems must be embedded in our Communities • ‘Creative Disruption and Innovation’ are core actions • No longer ‘Every Person for Themselves’ • Re-envisioning community health resources as Health Commons with local rules, governance and disciplines with equitable distribution among and for all stakeholders

  5. Oregon Poverty Rate 8.9% in 2000 12.2% in 2010 NYT, November 17, 2011

  6. 2012 State Budget Reduction Estimates 1. YEARLY REDUCTION = • $1,064 • per member • per year • reduction 216,000 Tri-County Enrollees -$230M Portland 2. MONTHLY REDUCTION • $89 average • reductions • per member • per month • required • $1,064 • per member • per year • reduction = 12 months

  7. Challenge + Urgency = Opportunity Challenge • State Budget • Siloed System • History of Competition Urgency • State Budget • Shrinking Reserves • Economic “Reset” • CMMI Grant • Medicaid Expansion • Opportunity • CMMI Grant • Shared sense of urgency is compelling unusual behavior

  8. Redefining our Larger Family of Responsibilities & Relationships We’re searching for a new way to relate to a whole community’s need together – one that serves the needs of our very poor & uninsured; has hope to evolve into a healthier tomorrow; while not becoming overwhelmed or deteriorating our key organizations in the process; and actually, emotionally and morally renews our foundational American Dream of justice and opportunity for All.

  9. Guiding Principles “If you want to go fast, go alone; if you want to go far, go together.” -African Proverb Transformation that is Bottom-up, Top-Enabled Invest FORWARD

  10. Healthy Community Triple Aim: Key Portfolio of Changes for Impact & Success Population Health POPULATION SEGMENTS (By Outcome Drivers) STRATEGIC INITIATIVES Quicker ROI Care Cost High • Hi Needs Customized Care: • ED / Hosp. Hi-Utilizer Care Teams • Complex Case Mgmt • ED Diversion / Navigation • Rx Opioid Abuse Reduction • Supportive Service Assessment Hot Spots Hi Medical Hi MH / AD Hi Social Burning Smoldering • Delivery System Redesign: • Primary Care Home • Behav / Oral / Med Integration • Care Transitions • Aligned Specialty / E-referral • Healthy Birth Midwifery • LEAN Hospital • Community Standards Mod - Hi Medical Mod - Hi MH / AD Lower Social Health Care System • Resource Integration: • Service partnerships • Community Schools • Asset Support • Public health alignment Lo Medical Lo MH / AD Hi Social Community Health System Care Cost Low Slower ROI Quality Life Experience Social Resource Use

  11. Immediate Strategic Co-Initiatives

  12. Medium Term Strategic Co-Initiatives

  13. Longer Term Strategic Co-Initiatives • Healthy Birth / Midwifery Program • Housing Services Assessment / Strategy • Public Health Alignment • Social Service Alignment • LEAN Institute

  14. Strategies for Innovation:SampleInvesting Forward Portfolio • Primary Care Renewal (PC3) • Releasing Time to Care Focused Lean Improvements • Child and Adult Discharge Engagements • Mental Health and Clinical Integration • ED Navigation • Community Care Teams Resource Use Improvements Changing Site of Care • Specialty E-Referral • Local Telemedicine • Commons Health Record • Public Health Invigoration Technology Infrastructures • SUN as Community Center Environment Attitudes Behaviors ProcessesValue Chains Structures New Formations Methods of Change

  15. CMMI Health Innovation Challenge Grant – The Spark • $1M - $30M • 3-year cooperative agreement • Focuses on high cost/high risk groups • Significant workforce development/deployment • Rapid deployment (“shovel ready”) • LOI – 12/19 • Application Deadline – 1/27/12

  16. Accelerated Timeline for Building Collaborations • CCO Governance • Design • Legal Structure • Finance & Operations CCO Community Workgroups Macro M e d i c a i d E x p a n s i o n New Partnerships? Oregon Health Leadership Council ROW Demon-strated Outcomes ROW Demon-strated Outcomes Mezzo Speed-dating & Collaboration Collaborative Oversight, Shared Learning, CCO? Hotspotting CMMI Grant Proposal ER Diver-sion Pain Mgmt Micro PCPCH Mid-wifery In-patient Admits C-Section 7/1 1/1 11/6 Feb-March 7/1 8/1 11/1 1/1 7/1 1/1 2/1 2011 2012 2013 2014 Timeline ‘13-’15 Budget Begins 2012 DMAP Contract Year 2 of ‘11-’13 Biennium ‘13-’15 Budget Begins Election Day CCO Global Budget Begins? Full oral & mental health integration 2012 Legislative Session 2013 Legislative Session

  17. Evaluation & Measurement Funding/ Financing Health IT Partnership/Alliance/ Collaborative Shared Learning & Change Mgmt. Pharmacy Acute Care Inpatient & ED Outpatient/ Behavioral Health/ High Risk Pop. CMMI Grant – Draft Workgroup & Oversight Structure

  18. TriCounty Health Collaborative Draft Risk/Delivery/Governance Structure System Transparent Feedback & Learning Metrics Whole System Outcomes Community Community/Member Advisory Board(s) Provider Network 1 Provider Network 2 Provider Network 3 Provider Network 4 Secondary Risk: Clinical, Value, Performance- Based Risk Mental Health Mental Health Mental Health Council: Clinical Integrated Care Delivery Partners (Physical/Mental/Dental/Social Service/Addictions/Etc.) Delivery Technical and Learning Supports (Coordinated & Shared Services) Primary Risk: Insurance Risk Payer 1 Payer 2 Payer 3 Payer 4 Community Health Alliance Board of Directors Alliance: Joint Performance & Accountability, CCO? State Integrated Funding Draft Drawing for Discussion Only

  19. Design Principles for Governing the Commons:Commons as metaphor for Collaborative • Individuals know the boundaries and limits • Of the resource (“Common Pool Resource”) • Of the community of users (“Appropriators”) • Rules are locally made and adapted to context • Decisions are made together • Active measurement and monitoring • Effective sanctions • Mechanisms for conflict resolution • Latitude from higher authorities to act locally • Nested Commons Source: Ostrom quote by Don Berwick in 2009 IHI Forum Plenary

  20. HMA Revenue EnhancementEstimates

  21. Triple Aim Policy Scorecard Population Health (PH) PH PH PH Examples: Instructions Give the policy a score 1-5 for each of the three Triple Aim goals in the table below; Plot the score on the Triangle Connect the dots (5 = Achieves best possible outcome; 1= does NOT achieve at all) Good Policy: achieves all three goals of the Triple Aim 5 EC EC EC 4 CC CC CC 3 Mediocre Policy: A policy that achieves only one or two goals of the Triple Aim 2 1 Bad Policy: one that does not achieve the goals Triple Aim 1 1 2 3 2 3 4 4 Experience of Care (EC) Cost Containment (CC) 5 5

More Related