1 / 15

Criminal Law

Criminal Law. Chapter 8 Inchoate Crimes: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation Joel Samaha, 9th Ed. Inchoate Crimes. Offenses based on crimes not yet committed. Each inchoate offense has its own elements, but they all share two elements: the mens rea of purpose or specific intent

Jims
Download Presentation

Criminal Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Criminal Law Chapter 8 Inchoate Crimes: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation Joel Samaha, 9th Ed.

  2. Inchoate Crimes Offenses based on crimes not yet committed. Each inchoate offense has its own elements, but they all share two elements: the mens rea of purpose or specific intent and the actus reus of taking some steps toward accomplishing the criminal purpose – but not enough steps to complete the intended crime. These offenses include: Criminal attempt, criminal conspiracy, and criminal solicitation.

  3. Inchoate Offenses • Criminal attempts: trying commit crimes. • Criminal conspiracy: making agreements with someone else to commit a crime. • Criminal solicitation: trying to get someone else to commit a crime.

  4. Attempt 1) Intent or purpose to commit a specific crime. 2) An act, or acts, to carry out the intent. * (statutes vary among states as to specific or general attempt).

  5. Attempt – Mens Rea Purpose to engage in criminal conduct or cause a criminal result. Discuss the facts and opinion of: People v. Kimball 311 N.W.2d 343 (1981 Mich.App. People v. Moreland WL 459026 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. 2002)

  6. Attempt – Actus Reus Model Penal Code’s ‘Substantial Steps Test’ for actus reus. Two elements: 1) “substantial steps” toward completing the crime and 2) steps that “strongly corroborate the actor’s purpose.”

  7. Attempt – Actus Reus The MPC requires that attempters take enough steps toward completing the crime not to show that a crime is about to occur but to prove that the attempters are determined to commit it. The following are examples of “substantial steps” if they strongly corroborate the actor’s criminal purpose to commit the intended crime: Lying in wait; enticing the contemplated victim to go to the contemplated place for its commission; reconnoitering (“casing”); unlawful entry; possession of materials to be employed in the commission of the crime; soliciting an innocent agent.

  8. Attempt: Actus Reus Discuss the facts and opinion of: Young v. State 493 A.2d 352 (Md. 1985) People v. Rizzo(1927) Commonwealth v. Peaslee(1901)

  9. Impossibility Explain the difference between legal impossibility and factual impossibility. What is an extraneous factor? Discuss the facts and opinion in: State v. Damms 100 N.W.2d 592 (Wis. 1960) State v. Robbins(2002) State v. Kordas(1995)

  10. Abandonment Does the voluntary abandonment defense relieve a would-be criminal of criminal liability? How would an extraneous factor influence this defense? Discuss the facts and opinion in: LeBarron v. State 145 N.W.2d 79 (Wis. 1966)

  11. Conspiracy Actus reus for conspiracy consists of 1) an agreement* to commit a crime (in all states) and 2) an overt act in furtherance of the agreement (in half of the states and the federal courts). Discuss the opinion and facts in: U.S v. Garcia 151 F.3d 1243 (CA9 1998) * The act of agreement between two or more people to commit a crime.

  12. Conspiracy Mens rea for conspiracy is not clearly defined. Is it a specific-intent crime? In other words, intent to attain a specific objective. Does the mens rea require purpose? How does the Model Penal Code define conspiracy?

  13. Conspiracy The traditional definition of conspiracy includes the attendant circumstance element that agreements involve “two or more parties agreeing or combining to commit a crime (MPC). However, the unilateral approach in most modern statues does not require that all conspirators agree-or even know-the other conspirators. What are wheel and chain conspiracies? Does conspiracy enhance RICO statutes? If so, in what way?

  14. Solicitation The actusreus in criminal solicitation consists of words that induce someone to commit a crime, e.g., advises, commands, entices, induces, urges, solicits. The mensrea in criminal solicitation requires words that convey that their purpose is to get someone to commit a specific crime. Therefore, solicitation is a specific-intent crime – a crime of purpose (some states require the objective to committing felonies or violent felonies).

  15. Solicitation Discuss the facts and opinion of: State v. Cotton 790 P.2d 1050 (N.M.App. 1990)

More Related