270 likes | 284 Views
Explore the management of cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in head-injured patients, including detection of optimal CPP levels and treatment approaches for improved outcomes. Understand the critical importance of maintaining adequate CPP for cerebral blood flow in various brain injuries. Learn about individualized CPP strategies and the impact on patient prognosis. Gain insights from expert studies and guidelines in neurosurgery.
E N D
Multimodal Monitoring in Head Injured Patients -Management of CPP:Detection and Treatment of optimal CPP Jürgen Meixensberger Department of Neurosurgery
1. Why? 2. Critical Border ? 3. Time Course ? 4. Individual optimized CPP ? 5. Therapy CPP = index of input pressure determining CBF and perfusion Effect of reduced CBF ml/100g/min Edema, Lactate Ischemia Loss of electric activity Penumbra Loss of Na/K Pump, ATP Infarction Cell death
Risk to secondary ischemic brain damage • Traumatic brain injury diffuse focal, multiple • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Vasospasm • Ischemic Stroke Penumbra
Guideline German Society of Neurosurgery Traumatic Brain Injury in Adults CPP „Adequate cerebral perfusion pressure is necessary to provide a sufficient cerebral blood flow. The question, whether to treat increased ICP or maintainance of CPP as first treatment goal, is still controversial in the literature.“ AWMF – Leitlinien – Register Nr. 008/001
Definition Cerebral Perfusion Pressure*is a surrogate of cerebral blood flow CBF. CBF = CPP (MAP – ICP*)/CVR * Referenced to the Foramen of Monroi Cerebral Perfusion Pressure CPP
Induced Hypertension Jaeger M, Acta Neurochir 2005 Meixensberger J, JNNP 2003 CPP and Cerebral Oxygenation Valadka A, Acta Neurochir 2002 Menzel M, J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1999 Doppenberg E, Surg Neurol 1998 Individual increasing of CPP guided by PtiO2 >10 mmHg decreased significantly amount of hypoxic episodes after TBI.
CPP=70 mmHg CPP=90 mmHg Coles JP, Brain 2004 1. Why? 2.Critical Border ? 3. Time Course ? 4. Individual optimized CPP ? 5. Causes 6. Therapy
The optimal CPP in patients suffering from TBI is unclear. • Recommendations: From CPP>50, > 60 mmHg to CPP>90 mmHg • Reduced as well as high CPP influenced Outcome in a negative manner. • Robertson et al. Crit Care Med 1999, Contant et al. J Neurosurg 2001 (n=189) • Balestreri et al. Neurocrit Care 2006 (n=429)
Outcome - Function of ICP and CPP Balestreri et al Neurocritical Care 2006 N = 429
Meixensberger J, Acta Neurochir 1993 Optimal CPP Brain Trauma Foundation, J Neurotrauma 2003,2007 CPP < 70 mmHg • Robertson C, Crit Care Med 1999Robertson et al., • Contant et al. J Neurosurg 2001 (n=189) • Balestreri et al. Neurocrit Care 2006 (n=429) CPP > 60 mmHg Avoid CPP < 50 mmHg Intact Autoregulation: CPP > 70 mmHg EBIC, Acta Neurochir 1997 CPP 60–70 mmHg
Optimized CPP - Therapy * TBI N = 30 * Episode > 10 min
1. Why? 2. Critical Border ? 3. Time Course ? 4. Individual optimized CPP ? 5. Causes 6. Therapy % ptiO2 < 10 mmHg % ptiO2 < 10 mmHg F R E Q U E N C Y Day 1-2 Day 3-5 Day 6-8 CPP mmHg
1. Why? 2. Critical Border ? 3. Time Course ? 4. Individual optimized CPP ? 5. Causes 6. Therapy Effect of reduced CBF ml/100g/min Edema, Lactate Ischemia Loss of electric activity Penumbra Loss of Na/K Pump, ATP Infarction Cell death
Concept individual optimized CPP (CPPopt) Steiner et al. Crit Care Med 2002 (n=114) • Based on continous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity index PRX • PRx = moving correlation coefficient MAP / ICP Czosnyka et al. Neurosurgery 1997
PRx CPPopt CPP Individual optimized CPP Steiner et al. Crit Care Med 2002
PRx CPPopt CPP Individual optimized CPP + PtiO2 Steiner et al. Crit Care Med 2002
TBI n=33 • Continous Monitoring(ICM-plus Software) • MAP • ICP [Codman] • CPP • PtiO2 [Licox] • PRx = moving correlationcoefficient MAP / ICP • Czosnyka et al. Neurosurgey 1997 • Data analysis CPP vs. PRx CPP vs. PtiO2 CPP-class of 5 mmHg
PRx CPP Results: • CPPopt n=28/33 (85 %) • CPPopt n=7 60-65 mmHg n=1 65-70 mmHg n=8 70-75 mmHg n=1 75-80 mmHg n=6 80-85 mmHg n=3 85-90 mmHg n=2 90-95 mmHg
CPPopt PRx CPP
PtiO2 PRx CPPopt CPP
CPPopt PRx CPP
PtiO2 PRx CPPopt CPP
CPPopt PtiO2 PRx n=28 CPP Jaeger et al Crit Care Med 2010
Therapeutic Options: CPP > 60, < 70 mmHg * Induced hypervolemia with cristalloids Cave: heart insufficience No body/head – elevation 0° Inotropica – infusion Cave: acute coronary syndrome, arrhythmia Diuretics – Reduction of centralvenous pressure Ventilation - „best PEEP“ - concept * Option; Prognostic value only given by case reports;
Management of CPP after TBI Recommendations: Avoid CPP < 50 mmHg – tominimize edema formation CPP > 70 – 80 mmHg – can improve perfusion if autoregulation is intact Class II evidence CPP of 60 mmHg – sufficient CBF and cerebral perfusion in most cases Ancillary monitoring is helpful to target CPP
Management of CPP after TBI Recommendations: Need for more data Individualized optimal CPP based on hemodynamic monitoring/ pressure autoregulation indices Randomized outcome studies