1 / 44

Palliative Care in the ICU: Spotting and Surmounting the Obstacles

Palliative Care in the ICU: Spotting and Surmounting the Obstacles. HERTZBERG PALLIATIVE CARE INSTITUTE. Judith Nelson, MD, JD Mount Sinai School of Medicine March 2006. Overview of Presentation. BARRIERS Empirical Evidence Commentary STRATEGIES Palliative Care Consultation

Leo
Download Presentation

Palliative Care in the ICU: Spotting and Surmounting the Obstacles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Palliative Care in the ICU:Spotting and Surmounting the Obstacles HERTZBERG PALLIATIVE CARE INSTITUTE Judith Nelson, MD, JD Mount Sinai School of Medicine March 2006

  2. Overview of Presentation • BARRIERS • Empirical Evidence • Commentary • STRATEGIES • Palliative Care Consultation • Routine Quality Monitoring/Feedback • QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION

  3. Death in ICUs • Among patients dying in hospitals, half in ICUs within 3 days of death; one-third have 10 ICU days during final hospitalization • Each year, 1 in 5 Americans ( > 500,000 people) die in ICU or after ICU tx during terminal hosp admission (Angus, CCM 2004) • Even with optimal care, mortality for common ICU conditions ranges from ̴ 30% (sepsis, ARDS) to ̴ 75% (MV > 75 yrs) Typically, more death in ICUs than anywhere else in the hospital

  4. Existing Evidence: Unmet Palliative Needs • Communication is deficient, quantitatively and qualitatively • Many patients experience symptom distress, underestimated and undertreated by caregivers • Prevailing practices (e.g. w/d of LST) are inconsistent, irrational • Clinicians and others are troubled by the current situation J Intens Care Med 1999; Crit Care Med 2001 www.promotingexcellence.org - Crit Care Peer Workgroup

  5. Commitment • Priority • Domains • Benefit • Philanthropy Why, then, is change so slow and difficult? Can we accelerate the process?

  6. Barriers and Beholders • Survey Evidence: • Critical care nurses in AACN • Kirchhoff. Am J Crit Care 2000. • Nurses and physicians in WV ICUs • Moss. W Va Med J 2005. • Nursing and physician directors of US ICUs • Nelson. (In peer review.) • Opinion/Literature Review: • European perspective • Fassier. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005. • North American views • White. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005. • Nelson. Crit Care Med (Supp) 2001; Crit Care Med (Supp) 2006 (in press).

  7. End-of-Life Care:A National Survey of ICU Directors JE Nelson, DJ Cook, DC Angus, L Weissfeld, M Danis, KA Puntillo, D Deal, M Levy For the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Critical Care Peer Workgroup of Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care

  8. Questionnaire Mailed to RN/MD Directors of 600 ICUs in Random, National Sample • Format: Possible barriers (32 items): • Institutional/ICU, Clinician (MD/RN), Patient/Family • 1- a huge barrier to 5- not a barrier at all • Validity: Clinically sensible and reliable

  9. Nationally-Representative Respondent Cohort • 468 of 600 (78%) ICUs • 428 hospitals • 590 of 1205 (49%) ICU directors • 406 (65.1 %) nursing directors • 184 (31.7 %) physician directors

  10. National ICU Survey: % Rating Large/Huge Mean(S.D.) Rating Barrier to EOL Care

  11. Nurse-Physician Concordance N = 85 pairs of responses from MDs and RNs representing same ICUs: • No statistically significant differences re barriers • Both disciplines considered MDs to pose greater barriers than RNs

  12. Patient and Family Perspectives? • Family needs • communication, patient comfort • Family ratings of ICU experience, quality of dying and death – Canada and US • No direct information published re perceived barriers, relative magnitude or importance → Perspectives of patients and families are essential, though difficult to obtain

  13. Core Factors • Death denial → unrealistic expectations • Prognostic uncertainty → paralysis • Patient “autonomy” → burden, conflict • “Silos” of disciplines, specialties → fragmented care → → Slow Change

  14. “For most patients, two fundamental facts ensure that the transition to death will remain difficult. First is the widespread and deeply held desire not to be dead. Second is medicine’s inability to predict the future … to give patients a precise and reliable prognosis… When death is the alternative, many patients who have only a small amount of hope will pay a high price to continue the struggle.” Finucane TE. JAMA 1999; 282:1670.

  15. Prognostic Uncertainty • Possibility of survival, in baseline, even good health • Poor prognosis  certain death • Median predicted 2-month survival of SUPPORT patients = 20% on day before death, 50% week before death -Lynn J, New Horizons, 1997

  16. “Autonomous” Decision-Making Fewer than 10% of ICU patients can participate in treatment decisions. Easy to drown in a sea of surrogates, whose levels of anxiety and depression impair their own capacity for decision-making. -Pochard, CCM 2001; 29:1893 -Pochard, JCC 2005; 20:90

  17. Palliative Care in the ICU • Integrative • Interdisciplinary • Family (and Patient) - Centered

  18. “Integrative Palliative Care” • Incorporated in comprehensive critical care for all patients, including those pursuing life-prolonging treatments • Not simply a sequel to failed intensive care, but a synchronous, synergistic, component of ICU treatment

  19. Models for Integrating Palliative Care in the ICU • Increased attention to and competency in palliative care within the ICU team • Increased input from non-ICU palliative care consultants • Ends of spectrum, not mutually exclusive

  20. Promoting Palliative Care Excellence in Intensive Care: RWJ Foundation www.promotingexcellence.org Four demonstration projects: U Wash, MGH, Lehigh Valley Hosp, UMDNJ “Each project suggests a cultural change in critical care settings that fuses palliative care into existing practice patterns, and includes educating ICU staff and embedding palliative care practice in daily hospital routines.”

  21. Specific Strategies to Improve EOL Carein ICUs (National ICU Director Survey)

  22. Palliative Care Consultation in the ICU: Crossing A Cultural Divide

  23. Morrison et al. J Palliat Med (12/05).

  24. Evidence of Benefit Studies show improvements in care quality and costs: ► Better control of pain and other symptoms ► Higher patient and family satisfaction ► Shorter ICU and hospital length of stay ► Savings in ancillary services and pharmacy costs Campbell. Chest 2003; 123:266-71. Higginson. J Pain Sympt Manage 2003; 25:150-68. Finlay. Ann Oncol 2003; 13 Suppl:257-64.

  25. Before-After Study of Proactive Palliative Care Consult in MICU • Palliative care consult (NP/MD): • Anoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest • MODS: >3 organs for >3 days • Goals of the consult: • Communicate prognosis to family • Identify patient preferences • Discuss treatment options with family • Implement palliative care strategies Campbell, Chest 2003; 123:266.

  26. Palliative Care Consults in MICU Both diagnostic groups: ↓time from identification of diagnosis to comfort care goals (4-5 days) • Anoxic encephalopathy: ↓ ICU and hospital LOS (3-4 days) vs. historical control group Campbell, Chest 2003; 123:266.

  27. Other Successful Interventions • Lilly CM. An intensive communication intervention for the critically ill. Am J Med 2000; 109: 469. • Schneiderman LJ. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a RCT. JAMA 2003; 290:1166.

  28. Mount Sinai Experience: 7/04-6/05 For patients with PC consultation vs. DRG/age-matched controls without: •  ICU length of stay, especially for long-stay patients • Both for survivors and non-survivors • Savings in ancillary services and pharmacy costs Morrison RS (unpublished data).

  29. Palliative Care Consultation in the ICU • Collaboration is improving - but closed door, “parallel play,” “relay-racing,” and conflict continue • Respective roles require further definition • Locally-appropriate balance needed between internal ICU capability and expert input on complex or refractory problems

  30. “More is More vs. Less is More” • Both ICU and PCCS to adjust approach: “more or less is more” • “Understand the setting/culture, screen pro- actively, respond rapidly, maintain visibility, learn the language, respect the expertise, offer assistance to ICU” (M. Campbell) • “If you are selling death, you will have very few customers” (D. Meier) • Curtis JR, Rubenfeld. Improving palliative care for patients in the intensive care unit. J Pall Med 2005; 8: 840.

  31. Monitoring Palliative Care Quality: Honing Our Tools

  32. Domains of ICU End-of-Life Care Quality • Patient- and family-centered decision-making • Communication • Continuity of care • Emotional and practical support • Symptom management and comfort care • Spiritual support • Emotional and organizational support for ICU clinicians Clarke et al. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:2255-2262.

  33. VHA’s “Transformation of the ICU” Project:Palliative Care “Bundle” of Quality Indicators • VHA, Inc.: Cooperative network of > 25% of US not-for-profit, academic and community hospitals • TICU: Performance improvement project, > 60 ICUs have participated to date

  34. VHA’s Palliative Care “Bundle” • “Bundle” = Core set of “best practices” applied together for maximum effect on quality • TICU ICUs implemented bundles of quality indicators for sepsis, CRBI, vent mgt • striking and sustained QI with compliance • Palliative Care Bundle in advanced stage of development • First tool for ongoing, routine, monitoring and performance feedback

  35. Development Team J Nelson, MD, JD, P Pronovost, MD, PhD, C Mullerkin, MSW, LCSW, L Adams, MS TICU Clinical Teams, Measurement Team, Faculty/Staff Colleagues

  36. Development Process • Elicited input from multiple (~ 60) TICU ICUS - diverse disciplines, perspectives (RN, MD, SW, resp therapy, pharmacy, admin) • Using strongest available evidence and judgment, project team narrowed content for abbreviated, feasible tool

  37. External Review Interdisciplinary panel of national experts outside TICU: • National Consensus Proj for Quality Pall Care • National Quality Forum • RWJF Promoting Excellence in ICU EOL Care • Center to Advance Palliative Care • JCAHO • Rand Corporation (AHRQ project)

  38. Day 1 (1) Identify decision-maker (2) Address AD status (3) Address CPR status (4) Distribute info leaflet (5) Assess pain regularly (6) Manage pain optimally Day 3 (7) Offer social work support (8) Offer spiritual support Day 5 (9) Family meeting VHA Palliative Care Bundle (10) Organizational ICU Assessment: Family meeting room

  39. Data collection tool • Detailed specifications – e.g. • - numerators and denominators • - “interdisciplinary family meeting” • - “family information leaflet”

  40. Process vs outcome measures E.g., whether SW offered, not whether accepted or effective; whether meeting occurred, not whether informative or satisfactory Medical record review vs. direct observation Practical, relevant, action trigger Subset of indicators Avoid undue measurement burden, while relying on strongest available evidence

  41. Pilot Data Collection: November 2005 16 ICUs: Med/Surg (5), Mixed (4), Med (4), Surg (3) 10 hospitals, N = 94 • Information Leaflet 43.2% • Social Work Support 61.1% • Spiritual Support 37.5% • Interdiscipl Fam Meeting 40.0%

  42. Further Testing of Measuresas Quality Indicators • Patient/family perspective • Impact on selected outcomes • System redesign for implementation

  43. Recent/Ongoing • “Improving the Quality of EOL Care in the ICU: Interventions that Work” (2/06) → CCM Supp ’06 • Am Coll CC Med: Updating “Recommendations for EOL Care in the ICU” (original: CCM 2001) • VHA “Palliative Care Bundle” of Quality Measures • RWJ Grantees’ Emerging Reports • Collaborations between AAHPM and critical care professional societies • Communication Skills Training

  44. The fastest way to our objectives is to observe the speed limits.

More Related