BANGLADESH: Empowerment impacts of Social Safety Net Programs on women

1. BANGLADESH: Empowerment impacts of Social Safety Net Programs on women Gil Yaron World Bank Consultant PREM, World Bank, September 2008

2. Why measure empowerment? • The WDR 2000/1 identified “empowerment” as an important development objective • “Empowerment” is closely linked to other corporate agendas of “social accountability,” and the “demand for good governance” • Empowerment enhances people’s choices and opportunities • While a legitimate goal in and of itself, evidence suggests that empowerment improves poverty reduction outcomes

3. The Bangladesh PRSP emphasises the: Role of Social Safety Net Programs (SSNP) in reducing poverty Need to focus on the empowerment of women One SSNP (VGD) explicitly aims to enhance the income-earning capacity and self-reliance of ultra-poor and food-insecure women, government officials identify women’s empowerment as an “additional objective” of another program (PESP). Other SSNP that provide food or income for ultra poor women may well have an impact on their empowerment The substantial literature on women’s empowerment in Bangladesh does not treat SSNP in detail It was possible to explore this issue by adding TFESSD funds to an existing JSDF-funded survey of SSNP being implemented by the Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics Bangladesh - motivation

4. Bangladesh - context The aim of the survey was to measure the empowerment impacts on women of the following SSNP: • Food-for-work (FFW) • Vulnerable Group Development (VGD) • Primary Education Stipend program (PESP) • Vulnerable Group Feeding (VGF) • Old Age Allowance Scheme • Allowance for Widowed, Deserted, and Destitute Women • Allowance for Distressed Disabled Persons

5. Operationalizing empowerment • Empowerment: the interaction of agency and opportunity structure • Agency can be measured through proxies -- the material, financial, social, human, informational, psychological and other assets that people deploy to achieve their goals • Opportunity structure: the formal and informal institutions (“rules of the game”) that constrain or facilitate people’s ability to exercise agency

6. Bangladesh – methodology overview FGD (72) SSI analysis Household Survey (2741) Community Survey (69) Beneficiaries: ordered logit All: Propensity score matching Women’s Survey (2741)

7. Bangladesh – Empowerment indicators 1 Women’s questionnaire: • Control over assets (husband, self, joint, others) • Participation in village meetings and elections (& if not, why not) • Participation in household decision making (h, s, j, o) including joining organisations, economics & child related • Autonomy (visiting & purchases) & domestic violence

8. Bangladesh – Empowerment indicators 2 Household questionnaire empowerment module e.g. Programs make: no difference | a small difference | a big difference | a negative difference Being able to resolve disputes Membership of any local groups e.g. clubs or samitties Being able to choose who you vote for in elections Being able to complain to government officials Participating in development projects Being able to get clean water Access to news and information Being able to choose what work you do Keeping children in school

9. Bangladesh – PSM methodology Standard PSM approach Unobserved determination & social capital Biased results SSNP Empowerment Observable proxies on information & attending beneficiary meetings + factors affecting “lobbying” Our PSM approach SSNP Empowerment Unbiased results

10. PSM implementation PSM implementation followed standard practice: • Estimating the propensity score for each SSNP • Running balancing tests using STATA PSCORE • Matching using NN (with replacement, 3 closest matches, imposing common support & trimming 2% of observations) • Checking significant results with LLR matching • NN matches have hetroskedastic-consistent S.E • LLR matches have boostrapped S.E.

11. Methodology – empowerment We distinguish asset-based agency (such as improved self-esteem) from actual empowerment outcomes (such as greater autonomy or more decision making in the household) Source: Alsop, Bertelsen and Holland (2006)

12. Other methodological issues We distinguish between: female-headed households in which the female heads are formallywidowed, separated, divorced or abandoned; and those where women run the household without describing themselves in these terms Need to rule out the effect of multiple SSNP (not meant to happen but 3% of the sample dropped)

13. Bangladesh – findings 1 • SSNP modestly contribute to women’s economic empowerment • FFW appears to have less economic impact than do other programs • SSNP have a bigger impact on keeping children in school than on access to credit, land, water or electricity • Old Age/other allowances pay for education of children within the extended family & PESP is used in other areas -- e.g. allowances are fungible • PESP is popular but could be better targeted

14. Bangladesh – findings 2 • FGDs in particular show that SSNP do enhance self-worth and self-esteem, and increase women’s access to information. • But -- increased self-esteem and access to information did not translate into empowerment as measured by observable changes in behaviour. Behavior change depends on changes in the norms governing acceptable female behaviour. Should husbands be part of VGD capacity building? • Expansion of the Food-for-Work and Money-for-Work schemes was the most frequently voiced request from FGDs, although these programs have the least economic impact. How to design better workfare programs?

15. Bangladesh – findings 3 SSNP had little effect on women’s social or civic empowerment (i.e. on autonomy, involvement in household decision-making and incidence of domestic violence). Old Age Allowances and VGD may actually result in negative impacts, perhaps because increasing women’s economic assets triggers a conservative backlash from poor and poorly educated husbands. Further in-depth qualitative analysis is needed on this issue.

16. Findings 4 • The combination of FGD and quantitative survey techniques worked well. Ideally, the questionnaire design would have built on earlier FGDs • The Empowerment Framework conception of empowerment as the outcome of asset-based agency interacting with institution-based opportunity structure is useful. • It is important to focus on de facto female headed households, not only those which identify themselves as “widowed, separated, divorced and abandoned”.