160 likes | 724 Views
Why Young Women. High rates of HIV infectionHIV epidemic being fuelled by new infections in young women <20 years oldSocial and cultural factorsAge of sexual debutAge difference between partnersTeenage pregnancyAnal sex . Anal Sex and HIV Infection. Misconception that it is an exclusively homosexual male practiceSeveral surveys between 1994 -2000 demonstrate that 10%-30% heterosexual practice anal sexWomen who practice anal sex are:Less likely to use condomsMore likely to engage in r9444
E N D
1. Anal Sex and HIV Transmission in Adolescent Women in Rural South Africa Quarraisha Abdool Karim, PhD
CAPRISA & Southern African Fogarty AIDS Training Programme
3. Anal Sex and HIV Infection Misconception that it is an exclusively homosexual male practice
Several surveys between 1994 -2000 demonstrate that 10%-30% heterosexual practice anal sex
Women who practice anal sex are:
Less likely to use condoms
More likely to engage in risky behaviours
4. Anal sex (2) Pregnancy prevention
Female circumcision – experimentation prior to vaginal sex
Virginity testing
Virginity preservation
Rape
1 survey of adolescents in US, 39% of adolescents who engaged in anal sex report having been sexually molested
5. Purpose of proposed study Ascertain the role of anal sex in HIV acquisition in the rural community of Vulindlela, KwaZulu-Natal
Assist in design of behavioural and biomedical strategies to reduce HIV incidence rates and risk in young women
6. Specific Aims Assess the association of anal sex and HIV incidence rates in a cohort of sexually active adolescent women
Describe HIV risk behaviours in this cohort
Determine incidence rates of gonorrhoea, syphilis, trichomonas and chlamydia in genital tract + ano-rectal gonorrhoea
7. Vulindlela KwaZulu-Natal Midlands, 150 km west of Durban
Rural District with about 400 000 residents
7 Primary Health Care Clinics
+ 150 000 visits per annum
Referrals – Edendale, Northdale and Grey’s
CAPRISA Research Facility
8. Age-specific prevalence of HIV infection in ANC attendees - 2002
9. Age-specific HIV prevalence among select FPC attendees - 2002
10. Study Design Prospective Cohort Study
12 month accrual; 24 months follow-up
Study Population: 714 sexually active women <19 years old attending ANC or FP in one of three groups (238 each)
No Anal Sex (NAS)
Practice Anal Sex sometimes (IAS)
Regularly Practice Anal Sex (RAS)
11. Exposure levels Defined at entry
Never = NAS
Sometimes (IAS) – at least once in past 12 months but no more than twice in past 4 months
Regularly (RAS) – > twice in past 4 months
12. Measurement of Exposure Combination of face-to-face interviews + self-administered questionnaires
Open response – minimise bias and measurement error
Memory cues - Timeframes and dates
Baseline and 4 monthly Follow-up
13. Measurement of Primary Outcome All HIV testing in context of pre- and post-test counselling
Baseline: ANC and FP – Determine + Rapidmed Instant Screen; Discordant results -- 2 EIAs (Virology)
Incident HIV infections – 2 rapid confirmed with EIA
14. Measurement of secondary outcome STIs measured at baseline and follow-up visits
T vaginalis – Diamond medium
N gonorrhoea – NYC
C trachomatis – Microtrak (direct immunofluorescence)
Ulcers – HSV-2; H ducreyi, T pallidum
Proctoscopic visualisation if indicated
15. Potential confounder – Violence and age of sexual partner Conflict-tactic scale – measure sexual and physical violence – 6 measures
Schema – violence and age of partner
Older partner -----? increased risk of HIV
OP --? IRAS ---? IRHIV
Sexual violence --? IRHIV
SV --? IRAS ---? IRHIV
OP -? IRSV ---? IRAS ---? IRHIV
16. Potential Confounder – Sexual behaviour Method as for Anal Sex
Age
Frequency of coitus
Rate of partner change
Sex Work
Douching practices
Condom use