1 / 50

NC State Faculty Well-Being Survey

NC State Faculty Well-Being Survey. College of Natural Resources: Kudos and Concerns Presented to CNR Executive Committee September 26, 2008 Nancy Whelchel, Ph.D. University Planning and Analysis nancy_whelchel@ncsu.edu http://www2.acs.ncsu.edu/UPA/survey/faculty/FWBS06.CNR.Sept26_08.ppt.

Mia_John
Download Presentation

NC State Faculty Well-Being Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NC StateFaculty Well-Being Survey College of Natural Resources: Kudos and Concerns Presented to CNR Executive Committee September 26, 2008 Nancy Whelchel, Ph.D. University Planning and Analysis nancy_whelchel@ncsu.edu http://www2.acs.ncsu.edu/UPA/survey/faculty/FWBS06.CNR.Sept26_08.ppt

  2. Overview • Research design, methods, & response rates • Reports available & how to interpret them • CNR results • Leadership • Feedback, rewards, & compensation • Workload & support • Department life • Interests & activities

  3. Research Design, Methods,& Response Rates

  4. Survey Objectives • Provide readily accessible, “centralized” information • Collect relevant & actionable data

  5. Survey Development • Advisory committee • UPA, Faculty Senate, FCTL, ODAAA, HR, OEO • Feedback from • EOs, VP, Deans, Faculty Senate, Legal Affairs, IRB • Pre-tests • Tenure-track faculty, lecturers, department head

  6. Questionnaire • Included 13 areas related to ‘well-being’ • @350 closed-end • 8 open-end

  7. Questionnaire Topics • Image and vision • Leadership • Faculty-Administration relationships • Diversity/Multiculturalism • Working relationships • Faculty support & professional development (including contracts/grants) • RPT • PTR • Pay & compensation • Campus infrastructure • Recreation/wellness • Work activities • Overall satisfaction

  8. Population • On campus • Tenure/non-tenure track faculty/lecturers (including dept heads, music, PE, FYC, extension, clinical, research) • FTE .75 AY04-05 & AY05-06 • Final population = 1,625 • No sampling

  9. Methods & Response Rates • Web-based • Available Sept. 6 – Oct. 10, 2006 (29 days) • 69.7% overall response rate (1,132 of 1,625) [+/- 0.9 margin of error] • CNR response rate 78.2% (61 of 78) [HIGHEST RR] [+/- 2.7 MOE] • No significant differences in response rate between subgroups

  10. Reports Available& How to Interpret Them…

  11. Results & ReportsAvailable Online(www2.acs.ncsu.edu/UPA/survey/faculty) • Executive summary (overall results) • Research methods • Annotated questionnaire • Tables by: • Academic Profile (rank, tenure status, administrative experience) • Demographic Profile (gender, race/ethnicity, citizenship, age, # years at NC State) • College • Overall results • Tenure-track faculty only • Rank/tenure status, # yrs employed, gender, race/ethnicity • Select presentations & topical reports • Invitation for feedback

  12. Interpreting Results Everything is relative! Suggestions for what to look for: • Do responses/ratings meet pre-defined goals? • (e.g., % giving a positive rating) • How do responses/ratings for individual items compare to each other? • What factors/characteristics are related to ratings? • How do responses/ratings from one group of respondents compare to another? • (How have ratings changed over time?)

  13. Interpreting Resultsfor This Presentation… • All respondents (including NTT) • Relative to expectations • “Positive” rating • > 85% ‘excellent/good,’ ‘strongly agree/agree,’ ‘very satisfied/satisfied • “Negative” rating • > 25% ‘fair/poor,’ ‘disagree/strongly disagree,’ ‘dissatisfied/ very dissatisfied’ • Relative to other colleges = Among top 3 colleges = Among bottom 3 colleges

  14. Leadership

  15. Department LeadershipKudos Positive ratings for: • Allowing faculty autonomy (91%) • Support for academic freedom (90%)

  16. Department LeadershipConcerns Negative ratings for: • Establishing clear priorities (47%) • Providing needed resources (41%) • Resolving internal conflict (34%) • Fairly allocating resources (32%) • Appreciating the role faculty contributions play in achieving the mission of the department (30%) • Making equitable decisions (26%)

  17. College LeadershipKudos Positive ratings for: • Supporting academic freedom (96%) • Allowing department autonomy (88%) • Promoting diversity within the college (88%) • Advocating for the college (85%)

  18. College LeadershipConcerns (& Kudos) Negative ratings for: • Establishing clear priorities for the college (49%) • Providing needed resources (43%) • Allocating resources fairly (42%) • Appreciating the role faculty contributions play in achieving the mission of the college (37%) • Communicating with faculty (35%) • Resolving internal conflict (34%) • Making equitable decisions (28%)

  19. Faculty InputKudos Positive ratings for being encouraged to provide input on: • Program assessment activities (97%) • Curricular issues (95%) • Department hiring/appointment decisions (92%) • Decisions about allocation of resources in department (70%)

  20. Faculty InputConcerns (& Kudos) Negative ratings for: • College administration seeking faculty input in vision of college (42%) • College administration incorporating faculty ideas in decision making (42%) • College administration seeking input in administrative appointments in CNR (27%) • Department administration seeking faculty input in vision of department (25%)

  21. Professional DevelopmentKudos Positive ratings for: • Opportunities to participate in teaching workshops, etc. (95% [33% ‘very satisfied’])

  22. Professional DevelopmentConcerns (& Kudos) Negative ratings for: • Funding for scholarly/professional leaves (51%) • Opportunities for scholarly/professional leaves (40%) • Funding to participate in teaching workshops, etc. (36%) • Funding to present as scholarly/professional conferences (34%) • Leadership development opportunities (31%) • Opportunities for temporary teaching load reduction for professional development (31%)

  23. Feedback, Rewards,& Compensation

  24. Performance ReviewKudos and Concerns Positive ratings for feedback being: • Appropriately based on SME (92%) Negative ratings for feedback being: • Helpful to how well doing relative to peers (47%) • Given appropriate weight in merit raises (37%) • Helpful to professional development (28%)

  25. RewardsConcerns Negative ratings for department rewarding excellent performance in: • Extension and engagement (37%) • Service (35%) • Teaching/mentoring of students (31%) • Technological/managerial innovation (28%) Negative ratings for university rewards for innovation in: • Teaching (40%) • Extension/engagement/economic development (40%)

  26. CompensationConcerns (& Kudos) Negative ratings for competitiveness of salary relative to others: • In discipline at comparable institutions (52%) • At NC State (55%) • In discipline in UNC system (48%) • In CNR (43%) • In department (32%) Negative ratings for: • Understanding how salaries are determined (52%) • Department linking salary to meritorious performance (35)

  27. Workload & Support

  28. Work-related DemandsConcerns Almost half of CNR faculty say they are overwhelmed with work-related demands 82% of CNR faculty said they would change how they spend their work time

  29. StressKudos (& Concerns) Least likely to experience ‘a great deal’ of stress from: • Relationships with students (4%) • Committee work (7%) • Relationships with department faculty (7%) • Relationships with college administration (9%) • Self-assessment activities (10%)

  30. StressConcerns (& Kudos) Most likely to experience ‘a great deal’ of stress from: • Workload (44%) • Work/life balance (39%) • Research/publication demands (32%) • Institutional procedures (32%)

  31. Support for 6 Realms of Faculty ResponsibilityConcerns (& Kudos) Negative ratings for University providing sufficient resources to support faculty success with: • Service (42%) • Discovery of knowledge (36%) • Technological/managerial innovation (36%) • Extension and engagement (37%) • Teaching/mentoring of students (32%)

  32. TeachingKudos (& Concerns) Positive ratings for: • Discretion over course content (98%) • Influence over which courses teach (86%) • Level of courses teach (86% [39% ‘very satisfied’]) • Number of courses teach (86% [25% ‘very satisfied’])

  33. StudentsConcerns Negative ratings for ability of students: • Undergraduate student ability (22% ‘C’ or lower) • Quality of undergraduate students (30%) Experienced ‘a great deal’ of stress from: • Working w/ under-prepared students (22%)

  34. Support (Staff)Concerns Negative ratings for: • Department clerical/administrative support (51%) • Technical assistance (44%) • Support staff in college (35%) • Support for technology transfer (35%) • Support for assessment activities (33%)

  35. Contracts & GrantsConcerns (& Kudos) Negative ratings for: • PI control over indirect costs (70%) • Allocation of indirect costs to department (64%) • Allocation of indirect costs to individuals (61%) • Post-award support from university (35%) • Pre-award support from college (31%) • Post-award support from college (30%) • Pre-award support from university (28%)

  36. Campus InfrastructureConcerns Negative ratings for: • Availability of parking (80%) • Cost of parking (77%) • Amount of green space (64%) • General aesthetics of campus (54%) • Dining options on campus (43%) • Infrastructure of buildings (41%) • Lab space (37%) • Building maintenance (37%) • Availability of up-to-date equipment (35%) • Classrooms (35%) • Availability of informal meeting space (33%) • Upkeep of campus grounds (28%) • Office space (26%)

  37. Department Life…

  38. Department ImageKudos Positive ratings for department’s national reputation for: • Extension and engagement (89%) • Undergraduate education (78% positive) • Graduate education (78% positive) • Contribution to economic development (68%)

  39. Faculty Ability & AchievementsConcerns (?) Top grade* for: • Own demonstrated professional ability (44%) • Demonstrated professional ability of faculty (43%) • Own professional achievements (39%) • Professional achievements of faculty (33%) * % of respondents assigning a grade of “A”

  40. CollegialityKudos Positive (or relatively high) ratings to: • Collegiality/inclusiveness of faculty searches (93%) • Respectful dialogue between diverse perspectives (87%) • “Fit” in department (85%) • Relationship between faculty and department administration (83%) • Unity/cohesion among faculty (73%) • Relationship between faculty and college administration (71%) • Relationship between faculty and university administration (67%)

  41. CollegialityKudos (& Concerns) Give/receive help to/from other faculty in department: • Feedback on research (87%) • Understanding RPT processes/expectations (82%) • Department/college organization, requirements, policies (75%) • Advice on teaching (70%) • Issues related to work/life balance (46%)

  42. CollaborationKudos Collaborate with:: • Other faculty in department (93% [77% ‘frequently’]) • Non-faculty external to NC State (84% [50% ‘frequently’]) • Faculty from other universities (82% [38% ‘frequently’]) • Faculty in other NC State departments (79%)

  43. Diversity/MulticulturalismKudos • Positive ratings for department’s efforts to recruit, support, and retain students and faculty from underrepresented groups

  44. Diversity/MulticulturalismKudos (and Concerns) • Positive ratings for department providing a working environment that is accepting and respectful of differences in: • Age, disability status, gender, military status, nationality/ethnic origin, race and color, religion • Sexual orientation • Positive ratings for department making everyone feel welcome at social events, regardless of: • Age, gender, military status, nationality/ethnic origin, religion • Disability status, race and color, sexual orientation

  45. VisionKudos and Concerns (?) Optimism for future: • Department will change for the better (66%) • University will change for the better (49%) • Department has a clear vision and is working towards it (29%)

  46. Interests & Activities…

  47. Globalism / ServiceKudos Interest in / support for international or service activities • Research,extension projects outside the US (84%) • Advising international students (76%) • Leading/participating in international service projects (53%) • Leading/participating in Alternative Spring Break (37%) • Teaching in the NC State International Studies major (37%)

  48. Recreation/WellnessKudos Positive ratings to: • Facilities at Carmichael Gymnasium (91%) • Recreational space on campus (91%) • Availability of recreational activities on campus (89%) • Availability of cultural activities on campus (89%) • ARTS NC State programs (87%) • Organized Campus Recreation activities (85%)

  49. Recreation/WellnessKudos More likely to use/participate in: • Facilities at Carmichael Gymnasium (45% ‘at least once per week’) • Recreational space on campus (15% ‘at least once per week’) • Organized Campus Recreation activities (30% ‘at least once per year’)

  50. CNRFaculty Well-Being Questions? Comments? Discussion?

More Related