A NEMZETK ZI JOG RV NYES L SE S RV NYES T SE

1. A NEMZETK�ZI JOG �RV�NYES�L�SE �S �RV�NYES�T�SE Nagy Boldizs�r eload�sa az ELTE �llam- �s Jogtudom�nyi Kar�n 2010

2. A NEMZETK�ZI JOG �RV�NYES�L�SE �S �RV�NYES�T�SE Az ill�zi�k lerombol�sa: vagy a belso jog sem jog, vagy a nemzetk�zi jog is az. Forr�s: http://crimestat.b-m.hu/ErubsElozetes.aspx?BMSTAT=Adatok� ISMERTT� V�LT BUNCSELEKM�NYEK 2006: 425941 100,0 2007: 426914 100,0 100,2 � Ismertt� v�lt elk�vetok 2006: 129991 100,0 2007: 121561 100,0 93,5 � Eredm�nyes �s eredm�nytelen nyomoz�sok �sszesen 2006: 398432 2007393104 98,7 � Ebbol: Eredm�nyes 2006: 221600 2007: 213534 96,4 � - eredm�nytelen 2006. 176832 2007: 179570 101,5 � � � � Nyomoz�seredm�nyess�gi mutat� 55,6 % 54,3� %Forr�s: http://crimestat.b-m.hu/ErubsElozetes.aspx?BMSTAT=Adatok� ISMERTT� V�LT BUNCSELEKM�NYEK 2006: 425941 100,0 2007: 426914 100,0 100,2 � Ismertt� v�lt elk�vetok 2006: 129991 100,0 2007: 121561 100,0 93,5 � Eredm�nyes �s eredm�nytelen nyomoz�sok �sszesen 2006: 398432 2007393104 98,7 � Ebbol: Eredm�nyes 2006: 221600 2007: 213534 96,4 � - eredm�nytelen 2006. 176832 2007: 179570 101,5 � � � � Nyomoz�seredm�nyess�gi mutat� 55,6 % 54,3� %

3. AZ ENSZ Nemzetk�zi Jogi Bizotts�ga, 2001

4. A K�zgyul�s 56/83. sz hat�rozata az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�grol(2002. janu�r 28.) A K�zgyul�s � 3. Tudom�sul veszi a Nemzetk�zi Jogi Bizotts�g �ltal beterjesztett, az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�grol sz�l� tervezetet, amelynek sz�vege e hat�rozat f�ggel�ke, �s a korm�nyok figyelm�be aj�nlja azt, an�lk�l, hogy ez eld�nten� azt a k�rd�st, a j�voben elfogadj�k-e a tervezetet vagy m�s megfelelo l�p�st tesznek. 4. Elhat�rozza, hogy az �tvenkilencedik �l�sszak ideiglenes napirendj�re vesz egy t�m�t �az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�ge� c�mmel.

5. A K�zgyul�s 59/35. sz hat�rozata az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�grol �Ism�t a korm�nyok figyelm�be aj�nlja az (2004. december 16.) �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�gre vonatkoz� cikkelyeket, an�lk�l, hogy ez eld�nten� azt a k�rd�st, a j�voben elfogadj�k-e a tervezetet vagy m�s megfelelo l�p�st tesznek� A Fotitk�r �tj�n felk�ri a korm�nyokat, hogy �r�sban fejts�k ki, mi a teendo a feleloss�gi cikkekkel �sszegyujteti a nemzetk�zi b�r�s�gok �s egy�b �t�lkezo test�letek azon d�nt�seit, amelyekben a tervezetre hivatkoznak Elhat�rozza, hogy a hatvankettedik �l�sszak ideiglenes napirendj�re vesz egy t�m�t �az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�ge� c�mmel.

6. Vita 2007-ben Fejlodok: (�s Franciaorsz�g, Portug�lia) egyezm�nyt p�rtolnak Legt�bb fejlett �llam: maradjon az, ami Mr. BROWN ( United Kingdom) said the text of the articles in their entirety had not been wholly satisfactory to every State.� Nevertheless, States had accepted them in their current form.� At present, many of the articles reflected an authoritative statement of international law and had been referred to by international courts and tribunals, writers and, more recently, domestic courts.� It was difficult to see what would be gained by the adoption of a convention. He said the United Kingdom considered there was a real risk that, in moving towards that goal, old issues might be reopened, and a convention with a small number of participants might serve to undermine the current status the articles had achieved.� His delegation considered that it would be sensible and appropriate to take no further action on the articles, leaving them to exert a growing influence through State practice and jurisprudence. (VI. Bizotts�g vit�inak �sszefoglal�ja, 2007- okt�ber 23), http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2007/gal3325.doc.htm ) LUIS S. TAVARES ( Portugal) said his country felt that, after 60 years since the Law Commission embarked on one of its most important topics, the time was ripe for a decision on the future of the draft articles. �The draft articles on State responsibility should constitute the third pillar in the international legal order, after the United Nations Charter, and after the Law of Treaties codified in the 1969 Vienna Convention. �They were all the consequences of internationally wrongful acts. � Portugal considered that the Sixth Committee should carry on the task of adopting the articles as a binding international convention. �To better reflect on the issue, his country believed in the establishment of an ad hoc committee by the current General Assembly with a mandate to discuss the issue further, including the possibility of elaborating the articles as an international convention. Ms. ZABOLOSTKAYA ( Russian Federation) praised the Secretary-General�s reports for their compilation of decisions of international courts, tribunals and other bodies.� She said her delegation favoured the elaboration of the draft articles into a convention.� The General Assembly decision to defer action on the future of the draft articles was no reason for further postponement.� Dealing with some of the provisions, she said that countermeasures constituted an important aspect of implementation of State responsibility.� She also expressed doubts about the decision of States to invoke extreme measures when their interests were affected.� Nevertheless, she said, there were a number of positive aspects.� The approach of the International Law Commission had been successful in the production of a balanced document.� In her view, further thought should be given to the consequences of serious violations of international law.LUIS S. TAVARES ( Portugal) said his country felt that, after 60 years since the Law Commission embarked on one of its most important topics, the time was ripe for a decision on the future of the draft articles. �The draft articles on State responsibility should constitute the third pillar in the international legal order, after the United Nations Charter, and after the Law of Treaties codified in the 1969 Vienna Convention. �They were all the consequences of internationally wrongful acts. � Portugal considered that the Sixth Committee should carry on the task of adopting the articles as a binding international convention. �To better reflect on the issue, his country believed in the establishment of an ad hoc committee by the current General Assembly with a mandate to discuss the issue further, including the possibility of elaborating the articles as an international convention. Ms. ZABOLOSTKAYA ( Russian Federation) praised the Secretary-General�s reports for their compilation of decisions of international courts, tribunals and other bodies.� She said her delegation favoured the elaboration of the draft articles into a convention.� The General Assembly decision to defer action on the future of the draft articles was no reason for further postponement.� Dealing with some of the provisions, she said that countermeasures constituted an important aspect of implementation of State responsibility.� She also expressed doubts about the decision of States to invoke extreme measures when their interests were affected.� Nevertheless, she said, there were a number of positive aspects.� The approach of the International Law Commission had been successful in the production of a balanced document.� In her view, further thought should be given to the consequences of serious violations of international law.

7. Az ENSZ K�zgyul�s�nek 62/61 sz. hat�rozata (2008. janu�r 8.)D�j� vu? �Ism�t a korm�nyok figyelm�be aj�nlja az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�gre vonatkoz� cikkelyeket, an�lk�l, hogy ez eld�nten� azt a k�rd�st, a j�voben elfogadj�k-e a tervezetet vagy m�s megfelelo l�p�st tesznek� A Fotitk�r �tj�n felk�ri a korm�nyokat, hogy �r�sban fejts�k ki, mi a teendo a feleloss�gi cikkekkel Felk�ri a Fotitk�rt, hogy tegye naprak�ssz� a nemzetk�zi b�r�s�gok �s egy�b �t�lkezo test�letek azon d�nt�seinek 2004-re elk�sz�lt gyujtem�ny�t, amelyekben a tervezetre hivatkoznak Elhat�rozza, hogy a hatvan�t�dik �l�sszak (2010 osz) ideiglenes napirendj�re vesz egy t�m�t �az �llamok nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedetei�rt fenn�ll� feleloss�ge� c�mmel.

8. K�t tov�bbi feleloss�g t�ma: A nemzetk�zi jogban nem tiltott magatart�ssal okozott k�rok�rt val� helyt�ll�s (liability) - 1978 �ta - 1992-ben k�tfel� v�lasztott�k (megeloz�s � k�vetkezm�nyek) szuk�tett�k A vesz�lyes tev�kenys�gekbol eredo hat�ron t�li s�relem megeloz�se (tervezet-cikkelyek): 2001 ld. Olvas�k�nyv, 539. old A vesz�lyes tev�kenys�gekbol eredo hat�ron t�li s�relem eset�n elo�ll� helyt�ll�si k�telezetts�g (liability), azaz a k�rtalan�t�si k�telezetts�g allok�ci�j�nak elvei 2002-2006 (ld. 61/36 KGY hat�rozat mell�klete) A/62/452 KGy hat�rozat (2007) � nem d�nt sorsukr�l a Nemzetk�zi Jogi Bizotts�g az elsobol szerzod�st akar, a m�sodikb�l nem. A nemzetk�zi szervezetek feleloss�ge 2002: Giorgio Gaia rapporteur, 2003 elso jelent�s, 2008: hetedik jelent�s: 64 cikk a Bizotts�g elott , a mu m�g k�sz�l. GA res 61/36. Allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities Noting that the Commission decided to recommend to the General Assembly that it endorse the draft principles by a resolution and urge States to take national and international action to implement them, Principle 4 Prompt and adequate compensation 1. Each State should take all necessary measures to ensure that prompt and adequate compensation is available for victims of transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities located within its territory or otherwise under its jurisdiction or control. 2. These measures should include the imposition of liability on the operator or, where appropriate, other person or entity. Such liability should not require proof of fault. Any conditions, limitations or exceptions to such liability shall be consistent with draft principle 3. 3. These measures should also include the requirement on the operator or, where appropriate, other person or entity, to establish and maintain financial security such as insurance, bonds or other financial guarantees to cover claims of compensation. 4. In appropriate cases, these measures should include the requirement for the establishment of industry-wide funds at the national level. 5. In the event that the measures under the preceding paragraphs are insufficient to provide adequate compensation, the State of origin should also ensure that additional financial resources are made available. Principle 5 Response measures Upon the occurrence of an incident involving a hazardous activity which results or is likely to result in transboundary damage: (a) the State of origin shall promptly notify all States affected or likely to be affected of the incident and the possible effects of the transboundary damage; (b) the State of origin, with the appropriate involvement of the operator, shall ensure that appropriate response measures are taken and should, for this purpose, rely upon the best available scientific data and technology; (c) the State of origin, as appropriate, should also consult with and seek the cooperation of all States affected or likely to be affected to mitigate the effects of transboundary damage and if possible eliminate them; (d) the States affected or likely to be affected by the transboundary damage shall take all feasible measures to mitigate and if possible to eliminate the effects of such damage; (e) the States concerned should, where appropriate, seek the assistance of competent international organizations and other States on mutually acceptable terms and conditions. ____________________________________________________ Vita ILC-ben � legyen-e countermeasure szervezet eset�n �s BT szankci�k countermeasure-�k-e GA res 61/36. Allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities Noting that the Commission decided to recommend to the General Assembly that it endorse the draft principles by a resolution and urge States to take national and international action to implement them, Principle 4 Prompt and adequate compensation 1. Each State should take all necessary measures to ensure that prompt and adequate compensation is available for victims of transboundary damage caused by hazardous activities located within its territory or otherwise under its jurisdiction or control. 2. These measures should include the imposition of liability on the operator or, where appropriate, other person or entity. Such liability should not require proof of fault. Any conditions, limitations or exceptions to such liability shall be consistent with draft principle 3. 3. These measures should also include the requirement on the operator or, where appropriate, other person or entity, to establish and maintain financial security such as insurance, bonds or other financial guarantees to cover claims of compensation. 4. In appropriate cases, these measures should include the requirement for the establishment of industry-wide funds at the national level. 5. In the event that the measures under the preceding paragraphs are insufficient to provide adequate compensation, the State of origin should also ensure that additional financial resources are made available. Principle 5 Response measures Upon the occurrence of an incident involving a hazardous activity which results or is likely to result in transboundary damage: (a) the State of origin shall promptly notify all States affected or likely to be affected of the incident and the possible effects of the transboundary damage; (b) the State of origin, with the appropriate involvement of the operator, shall ensure that appropriate response measures are taken and should, for this purpose, rely upon the best available scientific data and technology; (c) the State of origin, as appropriate, should also consult with and seek the cooperation of all States affected or likely to be affected to mitigate the effects of transboundary damage and if possible eliminate them; (d) the States affected or likely to be affected by the transboundary damage shall take all feasible measures to mitigate and if possible to eliminate the effects of such damage; (e) the States concerned should, where appropriate, seek the assistance of competent international organizations and other States on mutually acceptable terms and conditions. ____________________________________________________ Vita ILC-ben � legyen-e countermeasure szervezet eset�n �s BT szankci�k countermeasure-�k-e

9. A FELELOSS�G TERVEZET SZERKEZETE I. R�SZ A NEMZETK�ZI JOGI FELELOSS�G KELETKEZ�SE II. R�SZ A NEMZETK�ZI �LLAMFELELOSS�G TARTALMA III. R�SZ AZ �LLAM NEMZETK�ZI FELELOSS�G�NEK ALKALMAZ�SA IV. R�SZ �LTAL�NOS RENDELKEZ�SEK A teljes tervezet olvashat� magyarul : Nagy B. � Jeney P. (szerk): Nemzetk�zi Jogi Olvas�k�nyv, Osiris, Budapest. 2002, 527 � 538.o.

10. A FELELOSS�G SZERKEZETEBENNE: ELSO R�SZ: A FELELOSS�G KELETKEZ�SE

11. A feleloss�g szerkezete I

12. A feleoss�g szerkezete II.-

13. A NEMZETK�ZI JOG �RV�NYES�L�SE �S �RV�NYES�T�SEILC feleloss�g tervezet, 2001 25. cikk Sz�ks�ghelyzet 1. Az �llam nem hivatkozhat sz�ks�ghelyzetre, mint valamely nemzetk�zi k�telezetts�g�vel �sszhangban nem �ll� cselekedet jogelleness�g�t kiz�r� okra, kiv�ve, ha ez a cselekedet: (a) az adott �llam egyetlen eszk�ze arra, hogy valamely l�nyegbev�g� �rdek�t s�lyos �s k�sz�b�n �ll� vesz�lytol meg�vja, �s (b) a cselekedet nem csorb�tja komolyan azon �llamnak, vagy �llamoknak a l�nyegbev�g� �rdekeit, amelyekkel szemben a k�telezetts�g fenn�ll, illetve a nemzetk�zi k�z�ss�g mint eg�sz �rdekeit. 2. Sz�ks�ghelyzetre, mint jogelleness�get kiz�r� okra az �llam semmilyen esetben nem hivatkozhat, ha: (a) a sz�ban forg� nemzetk�zi jogi k�telezetts�g kiz�rja a sz�ks�ghelyzetre hivatkoz�st, vagy (b) az �llam k�zrehatott a sz�ks�ghelyzet bek�vetkezt�ben.

14. M�SODIK R�SZA NEMZETK�ZI �LLAMFELELOSS�G TARTALMA -  I. Alapelvek 28. cikk A nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�s jogk�vetkezm�nyei Az �llam nemzetk�zi jogi feleloss�ge, amivel az Elso R�sz rendelkez�sei szerinti nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�s j�r, az ebben a r�szben meg�llap�tott jogk�vetkezm�nyeket vonja maga ut�n. 29. cikk A teljes�t�s folyamatos k�teless�ge A nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedet e r�sz szerinti k�vetkezm�nyei nem hatnak ki a felelos �llam azon folyamatos k�teless�g�re, hogy teljes�tse a megszegett k�telezetts�get.

15. A FELELOSS�G TARTALMA 30. cikk Abbahagy�s �s meg-nem ism�tl�s A nemzetk�zi jogs�rto cselekedet�rt felelos �llam k�teles: (a) abbahagyni a cselekedetet, ha az folytat�d�; (b) A meg-nem-ism�tl�sre vonatkoz� megfelelo biztos�t�kokat �s garanci�kat felaj�nlani. 31. cikk J�v�t�tel 1. A felelos �llam k�teles teljesen j�v�tenni a nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�ssel okozott s�relmet. 2. A s�relem mag�ba foglal mindenfajta k�rt, anyagit �s erk�lcsit egyar�nt, amit az �llam nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�se okozott.

16. A FELELOSS�G TARTALMA II. A s�relem j�v�t�tele 34. Cikk A j�v�t�tel form�i A nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�ssel okozott s�relem teljes j�v�t�tele helyre�ll�t�sb�l, k�rt�r�t�sbol �s el�gt�telbol �ll, ezek egyik�bol, vagy kombin�ci�jukb�l, �sszhangban ennek a fejezetnek a rendelkez�seivel. 35. cikk. Helyre�ll�t�s A nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�s�rt felelos �llam k�teles a helyre�ll�t�sra, azaz a jogs�rto cselekedet elott fenn�llt helyzet vissza�ll�t�s�ra, amennyiben �s amilyen m�rt�kben a helyre�ll�t�s: (a) fizikailag nem lehetetlen; (b) nem j�r teljesen ar�nytalan teherrel ahhoz az elonyh�z k�pest, ami a helyre�ll�t�sb�l fakad, szemben a k�rt�r�t�ssel.

17. A FELELOSS�G TARTALMA 36. cikk K�rt�r�t�s 1. A nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�s�rt felelos �llam k�teles a jogs�rt�ssel okozott k�r megt�r�t�s�re, amennyiben a k�rt nem teszik j�v� helyre�ll�t�s r�v�n. 2. A k�rt�r�t�snek fedeznie kell b�rmely anyagilag felbecs�lheto k�rt, bele�rtve az elveszett hasznot, ha azt meg�llap�tj�k. 37. cikk El�gt�tel 1. A nemzetk�zi jogs�rt�s�rt felelos �llam k�teles el�gt�telt adni a jogs�rt�ssel okozott s�relem�rt, amennyiben amennyiben a s�relmet nem teszik j�v� helyre�ll�t�s vagy k�rt�r�t�s r�v�n. 2. Az el�gt�tel �llhat a k�telezetts�gszeg�s elismer�s�bol, sajn�lkoz�s kifejez�s�bol, form�lis bocs�natk�r�sbol vagy adhat� m�s alkalmas m�don. 3. Az el�gt�tel nem lehet ar�nytalan a s�relemhez k�pest �s nem �lthet a felelos �llamot megal�z� alakot.

18.  III. R�SZ: A FELELOSS�G �RV�NYES�T�SE A s�rtett �llam A feleloss�gi ig�ny Az ellenint�zked�sek

19. A S�RTETT �LLAM (42.CIKK) A s�rtett �llam lehet a k�telezetts�g �ltal k�zvetlen�l jogos�tott �llam; vagy valamely �llamcsoport tagja, vagy egyszeruen a nemzetk�zi k�z�ss�g tagja ha az �llamcsoportal szemben elk�vetett k�telezetts�gszeg�s az adott �llamot k�l�n�sen �rinti, vagy a k�telezetts�gszeg�s term�szete olyan, hogy az �sszes jogos�tott helyzete radik�lisan megv�ltozik a tov�bbi teljes�t�st illetoen A 42 cikk ben az �llamcsoport tagja is s�rtett, teh�t az �sszes jogk�vetkezm�nyt felh�vhatja. �For example a case of pollution of the high seas in breach of article 194 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea may particularly impact on one or several States whose beaches may be polluted by toxic residues or whose coastal fisheries may be closed. A 48 cikk szerintiek nem s�rtettek csak kollekt�v jogot �rv�nyes�tenek. (ld pl. komment�r 319.old)A 42 cikk ben az �llamcsoport tagja is s�rtett, teh�t az �sszes jogk�vetkezm�nyt felh�vhatja. �For example a case of pollution of the high seas in breach of article 194 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea may particularly impact on one or several States whose beaches may be polluted by toxic residues or whose coastal fisheries may be closed. A 48 cikk szerintiek nem s�rtettek csak kollekt�v jogot �rv�nyes�tenek. (ld pl. komment�r 319.old)

20. A FELELOSS�G FELH�V�SA NEM A S�RTETT �LLAM �LTAL (48. CIKK) - ERGA OMNES K�TELEZETTS�GEK A s�rtett �llam mellett b�rmely nem s�rtett (de �rdekelt) �llam is felh�vhatja a jogs�rto feleloss�g�t, ha a megszegett k�telezetts�g az �llamok egy csoportj�nak az �rdek�t szolg�lta �s a felh�v� �llam a csoport tagja, A nemzetk�zi k�z�ss�ggel, mint eg�sszel szemben �ll fenn. Obligations coming within the scope of subparagraph (1) (a) have to be .collective obligations., i.e. they must apply between a group of States and have been established in some collective interest.764 They might concern, for example, the environment or security of a region (e.g. a regional nuclear free zone treaty or a regional system for the protection of human rights). Obligations coming within the scope of subparagraph (1) (a) have to be .collective obligations., i.e. they must apply between a group of States and have been established in some collective interest.764 They might concern, for example, the environment or security of a region (e.g. a regional nuclear free zone treaty or a regional system for the protection of human rights).

21. A FELELOSS�GI IG�NY A s�rtett �llam Az egy�b jogos�tott ig�nye abbahagy�s �s meg nem ua.ism�tl�s tov�bbi teljes�t�s ua. helyre�ll�t�s, k�rt�r�t�s, NINCSel�gt�tel

22. A FELELOSS�GI IG�NY KORL�TAI: Az ig�nyt az ig�nyek honoss�g�ra vonatkoz� szab�lyok szerint kell beterjeszteni Az ig�ny�rv�nyes�t�s elott ki kell mer�teni a helyi jogorvoslati lehetos�geket, ha azok hozz�f�rhetoek �s hat�konyak (�rdemiek.) Ha a s�rtett �llam �rv�nyesen lemondott az ig�ny�rol, ut�bb nem �rv�nyes�theti. A s�rtett r�utal� magatart�s�b�l k�vetkezik, hogy belenyugodott az ig�ny eleny�sz�s�be (el�v�l�s�be).

23. A BUNTETT HELY�BE L�PETT RENDELKEZ�SEK: A JUS COGENS S�LYOS (NAGYM�RT�KU VAGY RENDSZERES) MEGS�RT�SE ESET�N IR�NYAD� SZAB�LYOK (40-41. CIKK) Az �llamoknak egy�tt kell muk�dni�k abban, hogy jogszeru eszk�z�kkel v�get vessenek a s�lyos jogs�rt�snek Nem ismerhetik el jogszerunek a jogs�rt�ssel l�trej�tt helyzetet �s nem ny�jthatnak seg�ts�get a fenntart�s�hoz (Emellett a feleloss�g �ltal�nos szab�lyai is alkalmazand�ak.)

24. ELLENINT�ZKED�SEK: C�l: a teljes�t�s el�r�se Eszk�z: a jogs�rtovel szembeni k�telezetts�g idoleges nem-teljes�t�se Korl�tok: Anyagi jogiak: Az ENSZ Alapokm�ny�val ellent�tes eroszak tilos emberi jogokra vonatkoz� k�telezetts�gek a repressz�lia humanit�rius jogi korl�tai jus cogens

25. AZ ELLENINT�ZKED�S (KORL�TAI) FOLYT. Elj�r�siak ar�nyoss�g csak elozetes �rtes�t�s ut�n, cak a jogs�rto magatart�s abbahagy�s�ig. Nem alkalmazhat�ak, ha k�telezo d�nt�st hoz� b�r�i f�rum elott van az �gy

26. IV: R�SZ: �LTAL�NOS RENDELKEZ�SEK A tervezet al�rendelt a speci�lis feleloss�g-�rv�nyes�to mechanizmusoknak A tervezet nem sz�l a nemzetk�zi szervezetek feleloss�g�rol az egy�nek (pl. h�bor�s bun�s�k) feleloss�g�rol

27. K�SZ�N�M A FIGYELM�KET! Nagy Boldizs�r ELTE �JK Nemzetk�zi Jogi Tansz�k Tel.: 411- 6532 Dr�tposta: nagyboldi@ajk.elte.hu