1 / 22

Can Universal Scholarship Programs Reduce Inequality?

Can Universal Scholarship Programs Reduce Inequality?. Lessons from Kalamazoo. Dr. Michelle Miller-Adams Visiting Scholar, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Associate Professor, Political Science, Grand Valley State University March 9, 2011. Research Question and Rationale.

MikeCarlo
Download Presentation

Can Universal Scholarship Programs Reduce Inequality?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Can Universal Scholarship Programs Reduce Inequality? Lessons from Kalamazoo Dr. Michelle Miller-Adams • Visiting Scholar, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research • Associate Professor, Political Science, Grand Valley State University March 9, 2011

  2. Research Question and Rationale • Do universal, place-based scholarship programs, such as the Kalamazoo Promise, reduce unequal opportunities and unequal outcomes for students in high-poverty public school districts? Why of interest? • Proliferation of Promise-type programs nationally • 22 created to date, only 7 of which are universal • Interest in effective strategies for reducing achievement gaps by income, race • Debate over universal v. targeted social programs

  3. Universal v. Targeted Social Programs • Some social programs are directed toward those with demonstrated financial need • TANF, food stamps, Head Start, Pell grants • Others are universal • K-12 education, Medicare, Social Security • Higher levels of political and public support for universal programs

  4. Educational Inequality – Selected Indicators

  5. Hypothesis • Conventional wisdom is that universal programs are designed first for economic development impact, with school effects secondary. • Targeted scholarship programs seek to raise student achievement and reward performance. • I argue that universal programs are more effective than targeted programs in achieving BOTH economic development and educational goals. • Challenge: identifying pathways and dynamics through which school district and student performance are improved by universal scholarship.

  6. The Kalamazoo Promise: A New Model • Place-based -- Kalamazoo Public Schools • Universal -- every graduate is eligible • Minimum 4-year residency & enrollment • Funded by anonymous private donors • To continue in perpetuity • Covers 65-100% of tuition and fees at any in-state, public post-secondary institution for KPS graduates • Can be applied to any credit-bearing program • Each student has 10 years to use scholarship

  7. Kalamazoo Public Schools Demographics • Racial composition • 46% African-American • 39% White • 10% Hispanic • 5% other • Socioeconomic makeup • 69% of KPS students are classified as economically disadvantaged • 86% of African-American students • 46% of White students • Disparities within district (across 17 elementary schools) • Low-income percentage ranges from 97% to 25% • Non-white percentage ranges from 96% to 28%

  8. A tool for reducing inequality? • Distinction between inequality of opportunities and inequality of outcomes • Kalamazoo Promise works to equalize both: • Universal college access • Structural & cultural school change • Alignment of community resources • Skocpol (1991) – “targeting within universalism”

  9. Equalizing opportunity • Reduction in financial barriers to college attendance • Results (classes of 2006-2010) • 2,000 students have received scholarships • (84% of those eligible) • 1,100 are enrolled this semester • $25 million spent • Use of Kalamazoo Promise by race closely matches demographics of eligibility for the program. • Use of Kalamazoo Promise by low-income students closely matches demographics of school district.

  10. Usage by Race(data as of spring 2010)

  11. Usage by Socioeconomic Status*(data as of spring 2010) * Free & Reduced meal status is underreported for all categories because only most recent five years of data is available and high-school FARM rates are lower than total district rates.

  12. Unequal outcomes • Low-income students more likely to attend 2-year rather than 4-year institutions. • Positive outcomes vary across type of institution • Students at 4-year institutions: 85% • Students at 2-year institutions: 47% • Low-income students are struggling once in college. • KP users who qualified for Free & Reduced Meals while at KPS account for: • 35% of students in good standing • 70% of students on probation • 67% of students whose scholarships have been suspended

  13. Non-financial barriers • K-12 achievement gap by income and race • Lack of college preparedness • Academic, social, emotional • Absence of role models / support • Cultural: sense that “college isn’t for me” • Importance of defining college broadly • Indirect mechanisms of support for college access/success

  14. Equalizing outcomes • Cultural:efforts to ensure that every student is “college-ready” • Elementary school: full-day Kindergarten; early literacy emphasis • Middle school: new block schedule, career awareness and college preparation • High school: college readiness course, expanded AP offerings, credit recovery, weighted grades • Structural: socioeconomic integration of schools • Supported by enrollment increase & new school construction • Will it extend to elementary schools? Neighborhoods?

  15. Cultural Change • Increased Advanced Placement enrollment (2007-10) • # of AP courses taken: + 174% • # of students enrolled + 130% • Economically disadvantaged -- 63 to 259 students • African-American -- 53 to 211 students • Hispanic -- 8 to 68 students • Three years of rising NAEP scores, black-white gap reduced • Black KPS third-graders outperformed state average in 2009 • 82% passed reading, 89% passed math • Significant increases in Iowa Test of Basic Skills (4/10) for first-graders (first group to have all-day Kindergarten)

  16. Structural Change • Reversal of long-term enrollment decline • 20% enrollment growth since 2005 • Enrollment increase the result of: • Increased entry and decreased exit rates • Stabilization of ethnic/racial distribution • Low-income population has risen: 62% to 70% • Increased resources for school district • Per-pupil funding structure • Support for bond issues (regional) • Opening of new schools (first in 4 decades) • Redistricting to achieve better socioeconomic balance

  17. 25-Year KPS Enrollment Trend

  18. Initial Impact – Redistricting% of students qualifying for free or reduced-price lunch

  19. Questions about redistricting • Does socioeconomic school integration literature have anything to say about middle and high school? • Strategies for integrating elementary schools • Wake County (Raleigh-Durham) schools

  20. Comments, questions, or suggestions: http://michellemilleradams.commillmich@gvsu.eduKalamazoo Promise Research Web Sitehttp://www.upjohninstitute.orgThe Promise of Kalamazoo bloghttp://thepromiseofkalamazoo.org

More Related