150 likes | 686 Views
What is
E N D
1. Constructing Childhood: The History of Early Children’s Literature and the Place of Fairy Tales English 507
Dr. Karen Roggenkamp
Image: Orbis Sensualium PictureFacsimile of 1672 English Edition
3. Analyze children’s literature in order to . . . Uncover culture’s ideal views of “childhood”
Examine society’s concept of self
Interrogate individual author’s relationship to broader cultural contexts
Viewed across time, provides insight into our own concepts of childhood and “normalcy”
Image: Arthur B. Houghton, Mother and Children Reading, 1860
4. What did “childhood” mean? Key shifts:
“Augustinian” paradigm (17th Century, Puritans): Children innately corrupt, sinful; animalistic nature (self will) must be constrained; spiritual objectives; instruction through punishment
“Educationalist” paradigm (18th century; Locke): Children’s minds offer a blank slate (tabula rasa) on which to write; neither good nor evil by nature; intellectual and moral objectives; instruction through logic and reason; literature “to instruct and delight”
“Natural Educationalist” paradigm (18th-19th centuries; Rouseau): Children innately pure, wise; “childlikeness” (self will) must be developed and protected from corrupting social institutions; emotional and moral objectives; instruction through non-directive means
40 years ago: children need to read about harsh realities of life
5. “Children’s Lit” in Ancient World (roughly 50 BCE / BC - 500 CE / AD) Oral tales – heard, not read
Hybrid audience—children and adults alike
Aesop’s Fables—animal tales with pointed morals—not just for children
Guide/shape citizenry; entertain
Image: John Ogilby, The Fables of Aesop, 1673-75
6. Middle Ages(500 – 1500) Low literacy—class-based
Childhood generally ignored—short and not so sweet
“Little adults”—cf. portraiture
Medieval epics, romances, histories for adults also held children’s interest (e.g. Beowulf, King Arthur, Robin Hood, lives of saints, historical legends, etc.)
7. Medieval Fables(500 – 1500) Mingle “reality” with magic, fantasy, enchantment; animal characters
Literature rich with “childlike” elements (wonder, mystery, fantasy, etc.)
Gesta Romanorum (Deeds of the Romans), late 13th century: moral tales; animal tales; familiar story plots for centuries to come (Boccaccio, Chaucer, Shakespeare)
Image: Early Manuscript, Gesta Romanorum
8. European Renaissance(1500 – 1650) Printing Press (mid 15th century):
Print books in quantity—reduce time, labor, cost
Increased literacy, promoted education, disseminated knowledge and practice of reading
Eventually change nature of childhood, children’s literature, and fairy tales
Image: Replica of early Gutenberg press
9. Bad Boys and Girls: Protestantism, 17th-century Puritans, & Roots of “Modern Childhood” Ideal of universal literacy
Children products of original sin; prepare for adult religious experience
Instructional books, conduct books
Primers: teach reading, but also turn innately sinful children into spiritual beings
Themes of death, damnation, conversion
Image: From New England Primer, circa 1690
10. A little light bedtime reading . . . Popular reading for Protestant children:
Book of Martyrs (1563), Anti-Catholic account of “Bloody Mary”
The Day of Doom (1662), poem of damnation of world
Images: Thomas Foxe, Book of Martyrs, 1563; Michael Wigglesworth, The Day of Doom, 1662
11. Children can be Reasonable, too: The Enlightenment (late 17th, 18th centuries): John Locke (1632-1704)
Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693)
Young mind as tabula rasa (blank slate)
Children not burdened by original sin
Logical beings awaiting proper education—rational writings
Whole new construction of childhood—distinct phase of life
Image: John Locke
12. Romanticism (late 18th, early 19th centuries): Enter Innocence Jean-Jacques Rousseau
Emile (1755)—Children should be raised in natural settings, free to imagine
Children naturally innocent, moral – “The child is the father of the man” (Wordsworth)
Books should free children’s imaginations
Romantics influence writers of Golden Age
Image: Jean-Jacques Rousseau
13. Folktales, Fairy Tales, and the New Child Complicated role of “fairy tales” in literary history of 18th, 19th centuries
Romantic interest in folktales—collect “authentic” culture
But Enlightenment thinkers disapprove—folk culture too “childlike” and fantastic
“Fairy tales” eventually deemed appropriate only for children and “the folk” (peasant, “simple,” lower class)
More educated could be intellectually interested in folk culture and the LITERARY tale
14. Key Figures of Literary Fairy Tale Charles Perrault (1628-1703)
Tales from Times Past; or, Tales of Mother Goose (1697)
Retellings & “literary” renderings of Cinderella, Little Red Riding Hood, Sleeping Beauty, etc.
Some explicitly directed toward children
Image: Histoires ou Contes du temps passé avec des moralitez, 1697
15. Key Figures of Literary Fairy Tale Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm
Nursery and Household Tales (1812-1815) directed explicitly toward children
“Clean up” folktales; develop Perrault’s “literary” fairy tales
Rewrite to fit 19th-century sensibilities and ideas about morality, politics, social class, etc.
Image: Little Brother & Little Sister and Other Tales by the Brothers Grimm, illus. Arthur Rackham, 1917