1 / 10

Comparative Arab Experiences with Federalism

Comparative Arab Experiences with Federalism. Democratic Federalism – An Intensive Course offered to Iraqi University Faculty by the Forum of Federations – Amman, June 18 to July 5, 2007. Outline. Arab and Islamic experiences with diversity and unity

PamelaLan
Download Presentation

Comparative Arab Experiences with Federalism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comparative Arab Experiences with Federalism Democratic Federalism – An Intensive Course offered to Iraqi University Faculty by the Forum of Federations – Amman, June 18 to July 5, 2007

  2. Outline • Arab and Islamic experiences with diversity and unity • Successful federal experiences: The United Arab Emirates • Failed “federal” experiences: The United Arab Republic and the Yemeni unification process • Federalism and post-conflict peacebuilding: Why not Lebanon but (maybe) the Sudan?

  3. Arab and Islamic experiences with diversity and unity • Diversity in the Arab World: • Sources of diversity: ethnicity, language, and religion • Historical expressions of diversity • Provinces, governorates under the various Arab/Islamic empires • The millet system under the Ottoman empire • Unity in the Arab World: • The concept of the Umma • Arab nationalism – al qawmiyya al `arabiyya

  4. Successful federal experiences : The United Arab Emirates(1) Context and Prerequisites • A history of past cooperation – The Trucial States (from 1820-1892 to 1971) • A hostile regional environment – federalism as a bulwark against strong neighbours • Extensive border disputes – federalism as a mechanism of conflict-management • Extremely diverse units – asymmetrical federalism?

  5. Successful federal experiences : The United Arab Emirates(2) Characteristics • A flexible and creatively ambiguous constitution • A founding (and renewed) compromise between wahdawis and ittihadis • A social compact based on rentierism • Supportive institutional structures

  6. Failed “federal” experiences : (1)The United Arab Republic (1958-1961) • Context and prerequisites • Two competing visions: one quasi-federal, the other unitary • A union of equal partners: Coming together and staying apart • Domestic political struggles in Syria: Baathists vs. Communists • A consecration of Arab unity: Melding together • The aura of Gamal ‘Abd al-Nasser and the weight of Egypt • Plebiscite and the ratification of the Union • Characteristics • An unstable bipolar arrangement • No geographic contiguity • High asymmetry in size and capacity • Authoritarianism at the center • Egyptian dominance of political life and of the Syrian administration

  7. Failed “federal” experiences: (2) Yemeni unification (1990-1994) • Context and prerequisites • The end of the Cold War • The discovery of oil and natural gas in the contested border area between North and South Yemen • but ... the decision to back Iraq in its invasion of Kuwait • Characteristics • Two widely divergent systems

  8. Federalism and post-conflict peacebuilding (1):Why not Lebanon but (maybe) the Sudan? • Lebanon • Regions, what regions? • An extremely intermingled country – 17 minorities none of which (with the exception of the Druze community) is geographically concentrated • A logic of economic and administrative centralization – the overwhelming dominance of Greater Beirut • A problem of trust • A divided identity in a troubled regional context –The National Pact of 1943 • Unity vs. diversity: Federal proposals and majoritarian democracy • An existing alternative: • A history of consociational powersharing

  9. Federalism and post-conflict peacebuilding (2):Why not Lebanon but (maybe) the Sudan? • Sudan • An extremely complex Comprehensive Peace Agreement • Building trust • Through institutions: Proportional division of power at the center • Overnight: A relatively short transitional period – 6 years from 2005 to the scheduled 2011 referendum with a 2009 democratic election deadline • Building capacity under duress: The creation of a new large region (Government of South Sudan) • A gap between the text of the CPA and the practice of the Government of National Unity under the stewardship of the ruling National Congress Party • Unity over diversity: • Concentration of power and decision-making responsibility in the Presidency – rule by decree • A breach of trust • Pairing agreement in the attribution of ministries is not respected • Only 40 SPLM/A members in the GNU • No meaningful inclusion of SPLM/A in the civil service and other national institutions

  10. Federalism and post-conflict peacebuilding (3):Why not Lebanon but (maybe) the Sudan? • Sudan • Serious flashpoints • The Abyei problem • The management of oil • Complicated by internal and external factors • Internal factors • The lack of NCP political will • The lack of SPLM/A capacity • The death of John Garang • External factors • The Ugandan LRA and the security situation in South Sudan • Chad and the support to Darfur rebels

More Related