600 likes | 1.15k Views
IMAGE QUALITY . NOISE LINEARITY CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY IMAGE ARTIFACTS. NOISE IN CT. FLUCTUATION OF CT# BETWEEN POINTS IN THE IMAGE FOR A SCAN OF UNIFORM MATERIAL SUCH WATER. NOISE IN CT. NOISE LEVEL. PERCENTAGE OF CONTRAST OR IN CT NUMBERS. NOISE LEVEL %= STANDARD DEVIATION /CT # RANGE.
E N D
IMAGE QUALITY • NOISE • LINEARITY • CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY • IMAGE ARTIFACTS
NOISE IN CT • FLUCTUATION OF CT# BETWEEN POINTS IN THE IMAGE FOR A SCAN OF UNIFORM MATERIAL SUCH WATER.
NOISE LEVEL • PERCENTAGE OF CONTRAST OR IN CT NUMBERS NOISE LEVEL %= STANDARD DEVIATION /CT # RANGE
NOISE CAN BE MEASURED BY SCANNING A WATER PHANTOMAND COMPUTING THE MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION FOR FOR A REGION OF INTEREST. (ROI)
THE NOISE LEVELS FOR CT SCANNERS VARY AND DEPEND ON: • MAS • SCAN TIME • KVP • SLICE THICKNESS • OBJECT SIZE • ALGORITHM
ALGORITHM vs NOISE DETAIL EDGE-ENHANCEMENT STANDARD SMOOTHING NOISE
NOISE IN CT IS MAINLY RELATED TO • PHOTON FLUX ( # OF DETECTED PHOTONS) • MATRIX SIZE (PIXEL SIZE) • SLICE THICKNESS • ALGORITHM • ELECTRONIC NOISE ( DETECTOR ELECTRONICS) • SCATTER RADIATION
WIDTH OF PIXEL SLICE THICKNESS DOSE NOISE SPATIAL R. NOISE SPATIAL R. NOISE NOISE
LINEARITY • RELATIONSHIP OF CT# TO THE LINEAR ATTENUATION COEFFICIENT
CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY • THE UNIFORMITY OF CT # THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE SCAN FIELD OF VIEW IS ONE INDICATION THAT CT SCANNER IS PERFORMANCE IS ACCEPTABLE. • IT REFERS TO THE VALUES OF THE PIXELS IN THE RECONSTRUCTED IMAGE THEY SHOULD BE CONSTANT AT ANY POINT IN THE IMAGE OF PHANTOM
CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY CROSS-FIELD UNIFORMITY
IMAGE ARTIFACTS • A DISTORTION OR ERROR IN AN IMAGE THAT IS UNRELATED TO THE SUBJECT BEING STUDIED
IMAGE ARTIFACTS STREAKS RING CT# DISTORTION
SOURCES OF ARTIFACTS • PATIENT • IMAGING PROCESS • EQUIPMENT
STREAKS IMPROPER SAMPLING OF DATA PARTIAL VOLUME AVERAGING PATIENT MOTION METAL & BEAM HARDENING NOISE SPIRAL SCANNING MECHANICAL FAILURE TYPES AND CAUSES OF ARTIFACTS
SHADING PART. VOLUME AVG. BEAM HARDENING SPIRAL SCANNING SCATTER OFF-FOCUS RADIATION INCOMPLETE PROJECTION TYPES AND CAUSES OF ARTIFACTS
RINGS AND BANDS BAD DETECTOR IN III GENERATION CT TYPES AND CAUSES OF ARTIFACTS
MOTION ARTIFACT- VOLUNTARY & INVOLUNTARY CORRECTION: • IMMOBILIZATION • PROPER EXPLANATION OF PROCEDURE • SHORT SCAN TIME • MOTION REDUCTION SOFTWARE (SHIMADZU –MAC) I
METAL ARTIFACTS INCOMPLETE PROJECTION PROFILES STAR SHAPED ARTIFACTS
BEAM HARDENING ARTIFACT-CUPPING ARTIFACT • INCREASE IN THE MEAN ENERGY OF THE X-RAY BEAM AS IT PASSES THROUGH THE PATIENT • IT CAN OCCUR WHEN RADIATION BEAMS HAVE DIFFERENT PATH LENGTHS
REDUCTION OF BEAM HARDENING • BOW TIE FILTER UTILIZATION • SPECIAL CORRECTION SOFTWARE
PARTIAL VOLUME ARTIFACT AVERAGE CT NUMBERS IN SLICE
CORRECTING PARTIAL VOLUME ARTIFACT • THIN SLICES
EQUIPMENT INDUCED ARTIFACTSSTREAK ARTIFACTS • MECHANICAL FAILURE • POOR GANTRY RIGIDITY • MECHANICAL ASSIGNMENT • TUBE ROTOR WOBBLE • POOR SAMPLING OF THE DETECTOR • BAD DETECTOR-RING ARTIFACTS ( III GEN.) • TUBE ARCING
CORRECTION OF RING ARTIFACT • DETECTOR RECALIBRATION • BALANCING ALGORITHM UTILIZATION
ALIASING ARTIFACT • NOT ENOUGH SAMPLES
CORRECTION OF ALIASING ARTIFACT • INCREASE NUMBER OF VIEWS OR RAY SAMPLES PER VIEW. • CONVOLUTION FILTER (SOFTWARE METHOD)