240 likes | 620 Views
For Fun and Profit. Quantitative methods. I203 Social and Organizational Issues of Information. Definition of ‘Science’. “an objective , logical , and systematic method of analysis of phenomena, devised to permit the accumulation of reliable knowledge” (Lastrucci 1963:6).
E N D
For Fun and Profit Quantitative methods I203 Social and Organizational Issues of Information
Definition of ‘Science’ “an objective, logical , and systematic methodof analysis of phenomena, devised to permit the accumulation of reliable knowledge” (Lastrucci 1963:6)
Instrumental Positivism vs. Humanism • In turning sociology into a science, “it will be necessary to crush out emotion…it will be desirable to taboo ethics and values” (Ogburn 1929) • “Man is the measure of all things” (Protagoras 485-410 B.C.)
That other popular argument…Quantitative vs. Qualitative • "There's no such thing as qualitative data. Everything is either 1 or 0"- Fred Kerlinger • "All research ultimately has a qualitative grounding"- Donald Campbell
A Problem… Yoogle.com wants to better understand the concept of ‘credibility’ in information. In particular, they want to know more about how their users make judgments about credibility in information.
(Induction) (Deduction) (photo courtesy of dailyhaha.com)
Inductive Logic of Research in Qualitative Studies Generalizations are made, or Theories to Past Experience And Literature Researcher Looks for Broad Patterns, Generalizations, or Theories from Themes or Categories Researcher Analyzes Data to Form Themes Or Categories Researcher Asks Open-Ended Questions of Participants Or Records Field Notes Researcher Gathers Information
The Deductive Approach in Typical Quantitative Research Researcher Tests or Verifies a Theory Researcher Tests Hypotheses or Research Questions From the Theory Researcher Defines and Operationalizes Variables Derived from the Theory Researcher Measures or Observes Variables Using an Instrument to Obtain Scores
If our goal is to find support (or not) for a theory or hypothesis, how do we establish such a relationship?
X Y What to look for in a Quantitative Study: Conditions of Causality • Covariation • Non-spurious relationship • Logical time ordering • Mechanism to explain how X causes Y
Research types and causality: Descriptive • Descriptive • Summarize data • Statistics: histograms, means, percentages
Research types and causality: Associational • Associational • Only to relate variables • Predictions only made to show that a relationship exists • Statistics: Correlation, Multiple Regression
Research types and causality: Comparative • Comparative • Compares two or more groups • Looking for difference between groups • Statistics: t-tests, ANOVA (inferential statistics)
DiMaggio and Bonikowski 2008 reading for today… • Starts with a clear statement of a research problem that is not resolved: Digital Divide research presumes that adults who do not use the Internet are economically disadvantaged. • They want to (1) go beyond typical cross-sectional analyses, (2) control for as many individual factors as possible, and (3) distinguish between types of internet use rather than lumping them all together as a single concept.
Common Quantitative Research Methods Questionnaires, Surveys Experiments and Experimental Designs
Surveys and Questionnaires • Method of Analysis • Rely on existing variation in the sample population to obtain a ‘representative sample’. • Surveys also control for the influence of external factors by asking lots of questions from the same people. • Questionnaires are only one subset of all types of Surveys • That is, in-depth interviews, observation, content analysis could also be used in survey research. • Questionnaires are a specific method for obtaining a structured set of survey data.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Surveys and Questionnaires • Advantages? • Can be easily scaled for small or large studies • Allows researcher to collect a lot of data on a wide range of topics • Disadvantages? • Sampling becomes a big issue if you want to generalize to larger population • Most survey data cannot be used for true causal tests • However, Longitudinal data can help alleviate this problem (but not completely)
Experiments 19 Little Albert Milgram’s Authority Experiment
True Randomized Experimental Design • (1) Independent Variables are manipulated • (usually by experimenter, sometimes by context) • (2) Participants must be assigned randomly to various conditions or groups • When this condition is not met, it is a quasi-experimental design
Common Experimental Designs O X O Pretest-Posttest Control R O O X O Post-only Control R O O X O (1) Solomon 4-group O O (2) R X O (3) O (4)
Experiments • Advantages • Gives researcher tight control over independent factors • Allows researcher to test key relationships with as few confounding factors as possible • Allows for direct causal testing • Disadvantages • Usually a smaller N and number of independent variables than surveys. • Sometimes give up large amounts of generalizability in favor of direct causal analysis and controls. • Require a large amount of planning, training, and time.
Making Sense of Quantitative Studies • Think about the sample, who does this represent? • Think about the validity and reliability of the measures. • Think about the generalizability of the study. • Think about whether the analysis is claiming to be a test of causality (what was the method? How is causality established)?
Mixed Methodologies FTW • Puts the emphasis on the problem, not the method • Many combinations found in broad range of research topics: • Experiment / Questionnaires • Field Study / Experiment • Interviews / Questionnaires • Participant Observation / Experiments • Can also include using both qualitative and quantitative methods of measurement in a single study.