210 likes | 458 Views
Why are ethics necessary in research?. To insure the protection of human and animal subjectsTo insure that research outcomes are achieved using moral and appropriate guidelinesFor the purpose of clarifying that research contributes to the body of knowledge constituting the background of a discipline.
E N D
1. Define ethics…
3. Three Guiding Principles of Human Subject Protection
Autonomy
Beneficence
Justice
4. Autonomy - the capacity of individuals to make their own life decisions; self- determination
5. Beneficence - the obligation to attend to the well-being of individuals; principle of “do no harm”
6. Justice - fairness in the research process; equitable distribution of benefits and burdens; subject selection performed without bias
7. What are Institutional Review Boards and why do we have them???
8. A Little History (unfortunately there is lots more…)
Tuskegee study
Failure to treat subjects
Failure to tell subjects they weren’t being treated
Subjects not chosen randomly
Failure to use successful treatments developed after the start of the study
World War II and Nazi Experimentation
subjects not allowed to choose whether to participate
subject selection biased
justice was ignored
“treatments” were not valid by any stretch of science
9. … more history The Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital study (1963) where patients hospitalized for a chronic disease gave oral informed consent without full details of the study; they were then injected with cancer cells but not told they were getting cancer cells
Willowbrook study (1963-1969) children in a state hospital for the mentally retarded were injected with hepatitis virus so that researchers could study the natural history of the virus in this population. Parents consented but had been told the children would get the virus anyway because of terrible conditions in the facility
10. Actions Arising from Violations of Subjects’ Rights
The Nuremburg Code of 1947
The Declaration of Helsinki and continuing revisions
The Belmont Report and continuing revisions
11. The Nuremburg Code of 1947 Occurred as a result of Nazi war crimes
emphasized that participants in research should voluntarily consent to participate
can consent only after being informed of the study procedures
studies can only be performed by qualified individuals
12. Declaration of Helsinki, 1964 The International Code of Ethics for Biomedical Research
Concept of independent review of research by qualified individuals not associated with the project
Right to refuse publication for work not done in accordance with the accords
13. The Belmont Report (1979) Finalized report on the decisions made for the protection of human subjects starting in 1974
Standardizes requirements for informed consent and Institutional Review Board procedures intended to insure autonomy, beneficence, and justice
14. IRB Membership Both genders must be represented
Multiple professional groups must be represented
One non-scientific member
One member separate from the institution
Committee members must be able to judge submitted studies
15. www.uab.edu/irb
16. Ethical Responsibilities of the Researcher Honesty and integrity in every phase of research
To do clinical research that is meaningful
To be competent and have expertise in the area under investigation
Publication of research outcomes, being honest and thorough in the documentation of such outcomes
To give credit to collaborators
Conducting data analysis through procedures which are appropriate and to not manipulate the data to achieve results the investigator wants
17. Control Groups
What are they?
Why are they necessary?
18. Elements of Informed Consent
19. What is included in Informed Consent? Patient/participant is fully informed of purpose, procedures, risks and discomforts, benefits, and alternatives
All information is confidential and anonymous
Consent Form written in lay language
Researcher available to answer questions at any time
Consent must be voluntary
Special consideration for vulnerable populations
Free to withdraw consent at any time
20. What ethical violations did you find in the UAB study on the web page?
21. Violations in Dermatology Drug Study Conflicts of interest
PI failed to take responsibility for the study
Falsification of data
Failure to tell subjects of other interventions
Failure to tell subjects when study results proved false
Falsification of information from PI to IRB
Failure of IRB to intervene when fraud was discovered
Failure of PI to insist on writing up results instead of letting the company do it
Competition between overseeing agencies at the federal level