1 / 80

ASAM Timeline-Important Dates

2. Workshop Overview. IntroductionReporting and School Level ResultsEvents and Developments Utilization and Capacity BuildingASAM in an NCLB World . 3. Introduction. ASAM Development

Sophia
Download Presentation

ASAM Timeline-Important Dates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    2. 2

    3. 3

    4. 4

    5. 5

    6. 6

    7. 7

    8. 8

    9. 9

    10. 10

    11. 11

    12. 12

    13. 13

    14. 14

    15. 15

    16. 16

    17. 17 ASAM Timeline-Important Dates January 1, 2005, PATRS goes active for school year 2004-05 June 15, 2005, ASAM ORS goes active for school year 2004-05 June 30, 2005, Public Reporting of ASAM School Reports for school year 2003-04 July 31, 2005, 2004-05 Pre-Post Data Deadline to PATRS September 30, 2005, Deadline for school year 2004-05 ASAM ORS reporting November 30, 2005, Deadline for CDE receipt of school year 2004-05 ASAM ORS Certified Report Forms December 31, 2005, Public Reporting of ASAM School Reports for school year 2004-05

    18. 18

    19. 19

    20. 20

    21. 21

    22. 22

    23. 23

    24. 24

    25. 25

    26. 26

    27. 27

    28. 28

    29. 29

    30. 30

    31. 31

    32. 32

    33. 33

    34. 34

    35. 35

    36. 36

    37. 37

    38. 38

    39. 39

    40. 40

    41. 41

    42. 42

    43. 43 ASAM Single Year Accountability Status Step 1: Performance Indicators State Board-approved performance standards determine school’s status on each selected performance indicator based on: Experience in other states on similar indicators Two years of collected data from ASAM schools Credibility of data Research on achievement levels

    44. 44 ASAM Accountability Status: Step 1: Performance Indicators

    45. 45 ASAM Single Year Accountability Status

    46. 46

    47. 47

    48. 48

    49. 49 The PSAA Subcommittee approved that in 2005-06, there will be a window within which an ASAM school can change performance indicators.

    50. 50 Parameters for Changing Indicators

    51. 51 Parameters for Changing Indicators

    52. 52 Appeal and Annotation Process Designed to ensure fair treatment of all ASAM schools Appeal process allows school to petition for review of ASAM accountability status when it believes data on which decision is made are invalid Annotation process (voluntary) allows school to submit contextual information in conjunction with ASAM accountability status, when appropriate Annotation does not overturn school’s accountability status Sample conditions for submission of an annotation: Significant growth occurred from previous year, but accountability status did not improve School characteristics vary widely from other ASAM schools or from previous years’ student population

    53. 53

    54. 54

    55. 55

    56. 56

    57. 57

    58. 58

    59. 59

    60. 60

    61. 61

    62. 62

    63. 63

    64. 64

    65. 65

    66. 66

    67. 67

    68. 68

    69. 69

    70. 70 Role Of ASAM In An NCLB World Provides important information recognized by the state Allows presentation of a more comprehensive picture of school effectiveness Recognizes the distinctiveness of ASAM student populations and goals

    71. 71

    72. 72

    73. 73

    74. 74

    75. 75

    76. 76

    77. 77 Justification For Continuation of ASAM Accountability System State law: The Public Schools Accountability Act requires the development of an accountability system for alternative school serving very high-risk students. School-level Accountability: The majority of ASAM schools (approximately 60 percent) continue not have sufficient valid test scores to receive a valid school-level API. Technical limitations: Very high mobility and other student characteristics limit the validity of the API/AYP model for most ASAM schools. Valid and reliable accountability for ASAM schools requires development of ASAM-specific accountability status.

    78. 78

    79. 79

    80. 80 Website Information ASAM http://ww.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/am asam@cde.ca.gov vkenneth@cde.ca.gov (ASAM ORS pin information) PATRS http://asam.wested.org http://asam.wested.org/pub/docs/27 (Workshop documents and Webcast archive) AYP http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ay/index.asp evaluation@cde.ca.gov API http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ap/index.asp aau@cde.ca.gov Program Improvement http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/ti/programimprov.asp mpayne@cde.ca.gov

    81. 81 Contact Information Robert Bakke, CDE rbakke@cde.ca.gov 916.445.7746 Rose Loyola, CDE rloyola@cde.ca.gov 916.323.2564 Don Dixon, Sonoma State University sra@sonic.net 707.829.0829 Joy Lewis, WestEd jlewis@wested.org 415.615.3286 Evelina Du, WestEd edu@wested.org 415.615.3142 John Burns, CDE jburns@cde.ca.gov 916.322.5015

More Related