1 / 27

New Cooperative Development: The Case of Hudson Valley Growers Association

Ag. and Food Cooperatives in Rural Development – USDA, ERS Workshop . New Cooperative Development: The Case of Hudson Valley Growers Association. June 16-17, 2004 Wash., DC Brian M. Henehan bmh5@cornell.edu

Sophia
Download Presentation

New Cooperative Development: The Case of Hudson Valley Growers Association

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ag. and Food Cooperatives in Rural Development – USDA, ERS Workshop New Cooperative Development:The Case of Hudson Valley Growers Association June 16-17, 2004 Wash., DC Brian M. Henehan bmh5@cornell.edu Senior Extension AssociateDepartment of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University

  2. MY ROLE AT CORNELL • Sr. Extension Associate in Dept. of Applied Economics and Management • Past Experience Includes Managing a Start-up Produce Marketing Cooperative • Program Leader for the Cornell Cooperative Enterprise Program • Secretary for NE Cooperative Council • www.cooperatives.aem.cornell.edu

  3. Cornell Cooperative Enterprise Program • Long standing relations with Ag. Cooperatives in region and U.S. • Teach undergraduate course on cooperative enterprise • Conduct applied research • Deliver extension and outreach program • Coordinate with the NE Cooperative Council, (NECC)

  4. NORTHEAST COOPERATIVE COUNCIL • 20 Rural Cooperatives Operating in New York State and New England • Non-Profit Mission: “Addressing Informational and Educational Needs of Member • Two Annual Events: • Cooperative Leaders Forum • Future Cooperative Leaders Conf.

  5. TODAY’S OBJECTIVES • Review the Case of Hudson Valley Growers – A Failed Cooperative • Identify Lessons to Be Learned • Common Pitfalls • Factors Leading to Failure • Discuss Issues Related to Public Policy

  6. BACKGROUND ON CASE STUDY MATERIALS & TELECONFERNCE • 1 of 3 Case Studies Created for Regional Interactive Satellite Teleconference • Broadcast April 2, 1997 to 34 Downlink Sites in 7 states in NE • Each Case Involved Structured Interviews of Members, Directors and Managers of Start-up Cooperatives recorded on videotape

  7. Forming Hudson Valley Growers • Leadership From Area Growers • Facilitation by Dutchess Co. Cornell Cooperative Extension staff • Support from Area USDA Soil Conservation Service staff • Advice from Cornell Univ. Cooperative Dev. Specialist

  8. Organizational Support • County Agent Trained in Horticulture, Worked Directly with Growers • He Saw Marketing as a Critical Issue • Soil Conservation Staff Saw Maintaining Farm Economic Viability as an Issue • County Extension Helped Prepare Grant and Handled Funds for Pilot Project

  9. Organizing Steps • 5 Growers Met to Discuss Marketing Challenges • Reviewed Potential for Forming a Cooperative to Grade, Pack, Market and Distribute Produce • Hesitant to Use Word “Cooperative” • Some Had Bad Experiences • Used Association as Title of Organization

  10. Public and Private Support • Some of the Group Were Already Marketing Independently to Up-Scale Restaurants • Recruited Support from Culinary Institute of America, CIA • Chefs from Famous NYC Restaurants Supported Concept • Local County Officials Interested as Ag. Economic Development Intitiative

  11. Mission & Vision • Primary Goals: • “Eliminate the Middleman” • Enhance Marketing Capacity • Penetrate More lucrative Markets • Create Regional Brand Name • Broad Range of Products: Fruits, Vegetables, Meat, Cheese, Wine, and Eggs from 6 Counties • Expand Beyond Direct Marketing Sales

  12. STEERING COMMITTEE AND GOVERANCE • Committee Members Selected: • Well Respected Growers • Most Were Outgrowing Individual Marketing Capacity Governance: • Members Elect Board • Directors Hire Manager • Manager Executes Business Plan

  13. Cooperative Formed in 1988 • Incorporated under New York State Cooperative Corporations Law • Developed Bylaws & Membership Agreement • Created Single Multi-product Marketing Pool: • Vegetables, fruit, eggs, meat and herbs

  14. First Two Years • Effectively Leveraged Initial Grant Support • Hired Talented Manager • The Start-up Cooperative Venture Successfully Penetrated New Markets • Generated Positive Margins • Grew Sales Volume • Increased Membership

  15. CHALLENGES AROSE • All Inclusive Approach to Handling Wide Range of Member Products Can Dilute Focus and Resources • Board Split on Best Marketing Strategy • Some Supported Expanding Sales to Larger Volume Farm Stands • Others Pushed for Increased Sales to NYC Restaurants • Higher Than Expected Farm Product Assembly and Packing Costs • Manager Turnover • Seasonal Cash Flow Problems • Accounts Receivable Collection

  16. ASSEMBLY ISSUES • Fragmented, Smaller Scale Producers Scattered Across a Wide Area • Marketing A Broad Range of Products • Attempting to Serve A Diversity of Customers • Critical Volume Needed to Support Costs of Assembly (warehouse, grading, packing, quality control)

  17. DISTRIBUTION ISSUES • Product Form That Shipped Well and Maintained Quality • Understanding Marketing Costs (order size, managing accounts, handling complaints, trucking logistics) • Eliminating the “Middleman” Means YOU Assume All the Risk and Costs • Critical Volume Needed to Support Effective Distribution

  18. ISSUES OF MEMBER COMMITMENT • Some Members Had Attractive Market Alternatives • Mixed Commitment to Ship Through Cooperative (non-binding agreements) • Public Support Ran Out and Members Had to Face Economic Realities (inadequate member equity) • Confidence Eroded as First Manager Left

  19. FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS • Avoided Spending Too Much on Feasibility Analysis • However, Received Private Grant through CEO residing in area for Market Research • Members of Growers Group Did Much of Their Own Analysis with Mixed Success

  20. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS • Assumptions Made: • Would Achieve Savings on Trucking and Sales Costs: • Eliminate transportation redundancy • Combine sales efforts • Operate on 10-15% Gross Margin • vs. 25-30% charges by brokers

  21. BUSINESS PLAN • Submitted for Grant Proposal, But Not Updated • Written to Justify Grant Expenses Not Necessarily as Working Document • Analysis Did Not Include: • per unit cost break down by product • accurate estimates of assembly and distribution costs • scenarios: best, worst, and expected

  22. MORE INTENSIVE ANALYSIS WAS NEEDED • Areas That Could Have Received More Attention: • Cooperative Finance & Member Equity • Transportation Logistics • Exploration of Partners in Supply Chain • “Work With Middleman” • Staffing Needs • Management Compensation & Equity Position

  23. COOPERATIVE DISSOLUTION MAY NOT BE TOTAL FAILURE • Member Interests May Have Been Effectively Advanced for the Long Term • It Could Have Successfully Addressed Market Failure and Outlived Usefulness • Permanently Improved Terms of Trade or Product Identity Standards for the Benefit of Members (and non-members) • Created a More Competitive Market on Behalf of Members

  24. POLICY IMPLICATIONS • Allow “Outside” Directors on Boards • Support Start-up Cooperative Capitalization: • Producer Financing for Member Equity • Lower Cost Financing • Accommodate Management Equity Position • Support Costs of Feasibility Studies and Manager Position • Encourage Applied Research and Outreach on Rural Cooperatives • Unique Form of Business • Evaluate Impact of Current Publicly-Funded Cooperative Development Efforts • Determine Most Successful Strategies

  25. SUMMARY • Hudson Valley Growers Attempted to Address Common Marketing Issues: • Spreading Out Fixed Costs of Handling and Marketing Farm Products • Generating Adequate Volume to Serve Larger Customer’s Demands • Along the Way, Fell Into Some Common Pitfalls: • Underestimated the Costs of Becoming the “Middleman” • Overworked and underpaid their manager

  26. SUMMARY cont’d • Common Pitfalls: • Underestimated talent needed to manage • Lacked Member Commitment (product, quality, equity) • Failure Had Minimal Negative Impact on Members • Lesson Learned May Contribute to Formulating Policy

  27. RELATED PUBLICATIONSwww.coopersatives.aem.cornell.edu • “Putting Cooperative to Work” – Cooperating for Sustainability Teleconference • Considering Cooperation: A Guide to New Cooperative Development • Questions Cooperative Directors Should Be Asking Management • What Gives Cooperatives A Bad Name • What Went Wrong at Agway

More Related