1 / 22

Serving Students with Disabilities in Iowa’s Accredited Nonpublic Schools

Serving Students with Disabilities in Iowa’s Accredited Nonpublic Schools. Iowa Department of Education September 8, 2010. Agenda. Federal law (20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(10)) Proportionate Share Consultation Process State law (Iowa Code § 256.12) “In the same manner and to the same extent”

Sophia
Download Presentation

Serving Students with Disabilities in Iowa’s Accredited Nonpublic Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Serving Students with Disabilities in Iowa’s Accredited Nonpublic Schools Iowa Department of Education September 8, 2010

  2. Agenda • Federal law (20 U.S.C. § 1412(a)(10)) • Proportionate Share • Consultation Process • State law (Iowa Code § 256.12) • “In the same manner and to the same extent” • Location of Services • Making Federal and State law work together

  3. Important Limitation This presentation deals with accredited nonpublic schools only. Unaccredited “schools”? Home-schooled children? • Proportionate share does not apply. • “In the same manner and to the same extent” does not apply.

  4. Federal Law The IDEA addresses three ways children with disabilities are educated in nonpublic schools. • Placed by school districts • Placed by parents (equitable participation) • Placed by parents, when FAPE is at issue The difference between the second and third bullet is “provide me services” vs. “write me a check.”

  5. Federal Law Three Key Steps • Count the number of kids with disabilities placed by their parents in accredited nonpublic schools. • With that number, Determine the “proportionate share” per AEA. • Consult with interested parties about using the proportionate share.

  6. Federal Law: Consultation Process Five required topics • Child find • Proportionate Share • Consultation Process • Provision of Special Education & Related Services • Explanation if nonpublic school officials disagree FORM: Appendix “A”

  7. Federal Law: Consultation Process • Consultation at least annually. • Consultation at the AEA level. • Some items are mechanized for public agencies already by Project EASIER, IMS, and the Special Education Supplement.

  8. Consultation Process Participants One consultation process per AEA Public agency representatives Nonpublic school representatives (Every private school? May be a good idea, but not required.) Parents of children with disabilities who attend nonpublic schools.

  9. Federal Law: Services • Evaluation/child find? Does not count toward proportionate share (includes out-of-district & out-of-state students). • Location? Determined by state law (LATER). • Type of services? Services must be “secular, neutral, nonideological.” • Public school staff? If necessary, and not ordinarily provided by nonpublic school staff. • Nonpublic school staff? Outside of regular hours and under AEA supervision/control. • Children are entitled to an IEP, not a “services plan.”

  10. Federal Law: Services “I don’t want an IEP. I want a ‘services plan’ instead.” ANSWER: No. “I don’t want an IEP. I want a ‘§ 504 Plan’ instead.” ANSWER: No.

  11. Federal Law: Services The consultation process is at the AEA level. The consultation process concerns support services. ☑special education consultant services ☑educational strategist services ☑audiology ☑occupational therapy ☑physical therapy ☑school psychology ☑school social work ☑special education nursing services ☑speech–language services

  12. Federal Law: Funds • Funds may not benefit a private school. • Funds/supplies may only be used for special education. • Funds/supplies under public agency ownership, supervision, and control • No permanent improvements to the nonpublic school site. • 1 year carry-over for unspent funds.

  13. Federal Law: Data Report annually • The number of children evaluated. • The number of children determined eligible. • The number of children who receive services funded by Part B.

  14. Procedural Requirements & Safeguards Affirmation of consultation or documentation of consultation (file with DE by June 30 of each year). Appeal regarding consultation process. State complaints & due process hearings regarding services. FORM: Appendix B FORM: Appendix C

  15. State Law Special education services provided “in the same manner and to the same extent” in accredited nonpublic schools as public schools. Iowa Code § 256.12(2) “In the same manner and to the same extent” is a floor and a ceiling. No more and no less. →Services must be required by an IEP. →Secular, neutral, and nonideological.

  16. Location of Services, pt. 1 There are four types of services that are provided on the nonpublic school’s site, with the nonpublic school’s permission. • Health services • Special education support and related services provided by area education agencies for the purpose of identifying children with disabilities • Assistance with physical and communications needs of students with physical disabilities • Services of an educational interpreter

  17. Location of Services, pt. 2 • All other services may be provided on the premises of an accredited nonpublic school ―at the discretion of the school district or area education agency ― with the permission of the lawful custodian of the property • Public agency discretion must not be abused. John T. v. Marion Indep. Sch. Dist., 173 F.3d 684 (8th Cir. 1999). Public agencies must not frustrate the purpose of § 256.12.

  18. A tale of two students Steve Sharon Has an IEP because of physical disabilities. Her IEP calls for, among other things, a daylong 1:1 aide to assist with instruction. CSD and AEA propose providing the 1:1 aide at the school Sharon would attend. Sharon’s parents and nonpublic school staff insist on on-site services. • Has an IEP with goals and services for speech and reading. • CSD and AEA propose providing speech services and reading at the school Steve would attend. • Steve’s parents and nonpublic school staff insist on on-site services.

  19. “Seven Steps” Under § 256.12 1. Is the child an eligible individual? 2. Is the nonpublic school accredited? 3. What services are called for in the child’s IEP? 4. What does § 256.12 say about location of services? 5. For instructional services, the AEA assigns a weight to the child. 6. Ensure any services provided are provided in accordance with the law: “secular, neutral, and nonideological,” etc. 7. For LEA services under 256.12, submit a claim for actual costs to the DE by August 1 of the following school year.

  20. ConfidentialityFederal law requires this. “If a child is enrolled, or is going to enroll in a private school that is not located in the LEA of the parent's residence, parental consent must be obtained before any personally identifiable information about the child is released between officials in the LEA where the private school is located and officials in the LEA of the parent's residence.” FORM: Appendix D

  21. Federal & State LawPutting the Pieces Together Both require an IEP. Both require secular services. Federal Law Proportionate Share Support Services State Law FAPE Remainder of Support Services Instructional Services

  22. DE Contacts • Thomas Mayes 515-242-5614 thomas.mayes@iowa.gov • Sharon Hawthorne 515-281-5461 sharon.hawthorne@iowa.gov • Steve Crew 515-281-6285 steve.crew@iowa.gov

More Related