E N D
1. QIO Synergies with AHRQ
2. The STEEEP Challenge in Context In 2001, IOM observed that a “quality chasm” exists
IOM defined quality care as care that is safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable and patient-centered
We continue to face large variations and inequities of care
Translating scientific advances into clinical practices that benefit patients
$2.3 trillion in annual spending, yet 45 million are uninsured
3. QIO Synergies with AHRQ AHRQ Roles and Resources
QIOs Today
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
Comparative Effectiveness Research
A View to the Future, with Your Help
Q&A
4. AHRQ’s Mission
5. AHRQ Priorities
6. Quality and Disparities Reports BSIs up 8 percent
Post-op catheter-associated UTIs up 3.6 percent
Minorities less likely than Whites to receive preventive pre-surgery antibiotics in a timely manner
7. QIO Synergies with AHRQ AHRQ Roles and Resources
QIOs Today
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
Comparative Effectiveness Research
A View to the Future, with Your Help
Q&A
8. Why QIOs? National themes, local interventions (9th Statement of Work)
Solid network of local providers and infrastructure
Taking healthcare quality from performance measurement to actual performance improvement
‘Boots on the ground’ in implementing quality initiatives
A vital partnership with national organizations
9. Where Your Expertise Is Needed Medicare beneficiary protection
Patient safety
MRSA
Pressure ulcers
Reducing use of physical restraints
Surgical and drug safety
Heart failure treatment
Prevention
Disparities: diabetes
Care transitions
Kidney disease
10. AHRQ and QIOs:QIO Learning Network AHRQ Knowledge Transfer/Implementation program
Technical assistance to QIOs and associated hospitals
Initial project: VTE Prevention Project
January to July 2010
Multi-state, accelerated learning collaborative
Employs AHRQ’s VTE toolkit
11. EDCAP Trial: Pneumonia Treatment Problem: Implementing evidence-based pneumonia guidelines into practice
In 32 hospitals (Pennsylvania and Connecticut), treatment based on Pneumonia Severity Index was implemented
Collaboration with QIOs
High-intensity guideline practice was most effective
12. Case Study: Iowa Patient Registry Collaborative effort of Iowa Medicaid Enterprise and Iowa Foundation for Medical Care
In 2007, developed patient registry
Used EHC Program’s Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User’s Guide for guidance
Registry compatible with EMRs, features physician and lab test tracking systems
Will help rural providers achieve medical home status
13. Case Study: Tennessee Report Card Tennessee released State Healthcare Report Card in 2009
Incorporates AHRQ’s Preventable Hospitalization Costs and Mapping Tool, Prevention Quality Indicators
Analyzes preventable hospitalizations associated with diabetes, hypertension
Part of successful push for all-State payer database
QSource worked with state departments to develop report card
14. QIO Synergies with AHRQ AHRQ Roles and Resources
QIOs Today
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
Comparative Effectiveness Research
A View to the Future, with Your Help
Q&A
15. Health Reform Law Patient Protections and Affordable Care Act – H.R. 3950
Now Public Law 111-148
Provides exciting opportunities for AHRQ
New opportunities for QIOs?
16. Important Provisions National Strategy to Improve Health Care Quality
Interagency Working Group on Health Care Quality
Quality Measure Development
Data, Collection, Analysis and Public Reporting
Health Care Quality Improvement (CQuIPS)
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
17. QIO Synergies with AHRQ AHRQ Roles and Resources
QIOs Today
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
Comparative Effectiveness Research
A View to the Future, with Your Help
Q&A
18. The Only Questions That Matter
19. What is Comparative Effectiveness Research?
20. An Unprecedented Investment AHRQ’s Effective Health Care Program created by Medicare Modernization Act of 2003
From 2005-2009, received $129 million from Congress for CER
Program has published more than 45 products, including guides for clinicians and consumers
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 includes $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness research, including $300 million to AHRQ
21. Plain Language Guidesin English and Spanish
22. The Cycle of Evidence
23. Reconciling Research and Care
24. QIO Synergies with AHRQ AHRQ Roles and Resources
QIOs Today
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
Comparative Effectiveness Research
A View to the Future, with Your Help
Q&A
25. Where Do We Go From Here? Implementing P.L. 111-148
Anticipating downstream effects of policy applications
Eliminating uncertainty about best practices involving treatments and technologies
Making sure that comparative effectiveness is “descriptive, not prescriptive”
Emulating the motto: National themes, local interventions
An eye toward quality improvement, always
Consistent and effective use of the same evidence to make care decisions based on the characteristics, needs and wishes of the individual
26. We Can’t Do It Without You! Not about us without us
Participate in CER: input on priorities, topics, comment on draft reports; www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
Participate on expert panels
Funding opportunities: www.ahrq.gov/fund
27. QIO Synergies with AHRQ AHRQ Roles and Resources
QIOs Today
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
Comparative Effectiveness Research
A View to the Future, with Your Help
Q&A