80 likes | 152 Views
ForCES Library Draft. Joel M. Halpern joel@stevecrocker.com. Purpose. To build a ForCES implementation that does anything, we need a set of LFB Class definitions There will be multiple documents that provide these This is intended to provide a good starting point. Structure.
E N D
ForCES Library Draft Joel M. Halpern joel@stevecrocker.com
Purpose • To build a ForCES implementation that does anything, we need a set of LFB Class definitions • There will be multiple documents that provide these • This is intended to provide a good starting point
Structure • I have grouped the Classes into sections • Groupings are fairly arbitrary • Connectivity LFBs • Packet Valdiation & Manipulation LFBs • Classifier LFBs • Packet Control LFBs • Queue & Scheduler LFBs
Connectivity LFBs • These LFBs represent the connectivity (very generally) to the external world. • This includes provision for stacking connectivity (PPP stacked on Serial Line, Frame Relay, or Ethernet) • Redirect LFB for FE-CE redirect packets • Tagged Data is envisioned for backplanes that can carry meta-data.
Packet Valdiation & Manipulation • Validators, trimmers, markers, and updaters • Separates validation from classification • Some implementations will not want to validate packets being forwarded • Updaters possibly should be folded into next hop selection LFBs
Classifier LFBs • Cover the different kinds of classifiers • Currently, one that considers incoming LFB port, and matches field contents from meta-data and packet contents • Separate LPM classifier • Trying to fold LPM into the general classifer structure hurt my head • Should we have different classifiers? • One that used metadata, one for packet fields
Packet Control LFBs • A catch all for odd functions • These may be better dealt with by the CE for the first release • They may exercise some useful features • ICMP, ARP related functions
Queue & Scheduler LFBs • Need to store and send packets • Separating queue and scheduler has been found useful in other models • Need to model the relationship • Rather awkward approach. Suggestions would be appreciated.