130 likes | 1.25k Views
Neo-Aristotelian Criticism. History of Neo-Aristotelian Criticism:. a.k.a. Neo-Classical Criticism Herbert Wilchelns (1925): “The Literary Criticism of Oratory” Sought to distinguish study of oratory from study of literature. Assumptions of Neo-Aristotelian Criticism:.
E N D
History of Neo-Aristotelian Criticism: • a.k.a. Neo-Classical Criticism • Herbert Wilchelns (1925): “The Literary Criticism of Oratory” • Sought to distinguish study of oratory from study of literature
Assumptions of Neo-Aristotelian Criticism: • Concerned with particular audience response • Concerned with reasonable effect • Judges rhetoric by its persuasive appeals and effects
Neo-Aristotelian Analysis: • Goal is to identify aspects of the rhetorical action that explains its persuasive effect on the audience. • Reconstructing the context: • Context/Occasion • Audience • Rhetor
Classical Canons of Rhetoric • Invention • Arrangement • Style • Delivery • Memory
Invention: • The main ideas, themes, lines of argument, and content • Inartistic Proofs • Artistic Proofs: • Ethos • Logos • Pathos • Inductive Arguments • Deductive • Enthymeme
Arrangement: • Types of organization structures • Chronological • Spatial • Thematic • Problem-solution • Cause-effect • Delayed thesis
Style: • Word choice • Dramatic depictions • Stories • Metaphors • Repetition
Delivery: • Use of voice • Facial expressions • Body movement/posture • All non-verbal components
Memory: • Not as relevant today
Limitations of Neo-Aristotelian Criticism: • Effects can be difficult to isolate and verify • Strict interpretation of effects doesn’t allow for moral judgments • Works best with oral presentations