210 likes | 229 Views
REGNET System Operation – D9. Scope. WP4: Demonstration, Assessment & Evaluation. Task Briefs. Task related Work (involved partners). T4.1 Execution of the demonstration phase (trial service) Responsible : TARX
E N D
Scope WP4: Demonstration, Assessment & Evaluation Task Briefs Task related Work (involved partners) T4.1 Execution of the demonstration phase (trial service) Responsible: TARX Involved: AIT, ONB, IMAC, SUL, LMG, NRM, KVA, TARX, MECH, MUS, ALI, IAT, GRAN, ICCS, ZEUS, VALT Deliverable D9: Report: "REGNET System Operation" Compiled & Edited by TARX Due by 2003-03-27 Deliverable 9: Report: REGNET-System operation”" Interim Report IR 4.1 Edited by TARX Task related Work (involved partners) T4.2 Refinement of the system and services where appropriate and necessary Responsible: VALT Involved: AIT, SR, TARX, MOT, ZEUS, SI, CERT, VALT Deliverable 10:Report:”REGNET-Demonstration (Trial Service)” Interim Report IR 4.2 Edited by VALT Task related Work (involved partners) T4.3 Analysis of the trial service, assessment and evaluation of the system. Responsible: IAT Involved: AIT, IMAC, SUL, TARX, IAT, ZEUS Deliverable 11: Report: "REGNET Trial Service and Recommendations" Interim Report IR 4.2 Edited by IAT REGNET Final Project Review
Product and services portfolio • Information management • Knowledge management • Data entry – meta data – topic maps • Search and retreival • Topic map visualisation • Product Catalogue Management • e-Shop • e-Auction • Alternative e-Shop • Alternative e-Auction • e-Procurement • e-Publishing • Portal • The REGNET broker REGNET Final Project Review
Legal issues - overall European Economic Interest Group Statutes EEIG Internal rules Agreements Statutes CSCs Internal rules Regional Cultural Service Centres REGNET Final Project Review
Legal issues - Agreements REGNET Final Project Review
Operational issues Functions:...........classic......+......domain knowledge.......... Technical:............network....................................................... Logistics:............ registered office........domain name......... Phasing: 1. AIT - VALTECH – ICCS – ZEUS – MOT – CERT 2. CSC AUSTRIA – VALTECH – ICCS 3. CSC EUROPE – AUSTRIA – LOW COUNTRIES – BULGARIA – GERMANY – SPAIN ITALY – GREECE REGNET Final Project Review
Content frame of reference Content from ALI with case studies and scenarios CC GRAN ICCS KVA LMG MECH MUS NRM ONB SUL serving as BENCHMARK Images Shop items Collections Thematic texts Topic maps Catalogue data REGNET Final Project Review
Methodology (1/2) ACTIONS • dedicated test bed actions • one to one sessions between technical and content partners • free testing at the content partners premises • a series of special test and demonstration meetings with the consortium FEEDBACK • pre-formatted questionnaires • free filled in return forms • consolidated group reporting • behavioural observation by WP 4 responsibles REGNET Final Project Review
Methodology (2/2) Feedback Content-techn. generation Reference & methodology Demonstration & Marketing Results collection Reporting & documentation Course and scheduling CSC Strategy REGNET Final Project Review
Demonstration cases (1/3) Several test bed actions in Germany for potential new users Switzerland Austria ............ Several dedicated demo sessions in Mechelen for the content partners Den Haag Toulouse REGNET Final Project Review
Demonstration cases (2/3) Test beds - focussed on market preparation - free of charge - content delivery and feedback - formal procedure (participate, content delivery, DB storage, test, feedback) Via - booth presence - seminars and work shops REGNET Final Project Review
Demonstration cases (3/3) Module 01 02 03 Module 03 04 05 Content group 1 Content group 2 Module 09 10 11 Module 06 07 08 Content group 4 Content group 3 Test and demo sessions with alternating groups on 4 workstations REGNET Final Project Review
Demo sessions view REGNET Final Project Review
Real life case example ONB (1/2) The cards collection case • ONB Picture archive • Digitised images of catalogue cards • 1.100.000 records • On line Web application • Ordering service REGNET Final Project Review
Real life case example ONB (2/2) Content Providers Data Bases REGNET Final Project Review
Real life case example MECH (1/2) The interactive multimedia production “Faydherbe” • MECH Collection • Interactive guided tour • 103 images • 136 small texts (NL and EN) • 112 thematic texts (NL and EN) • 110 behaviours • Public terminal application in one the museums REGNET Final Project Review
Real life case example MECH (2/2) REGNET Final Project Review
Workflow Actor: CHI(CSC) CSC - CHI CHI(CSC) CSC(CHI) CSC(CHI) PUB(CSC, CHI) Actor: CHI(CSC) CSC - CHI CHI(CSC) CSC(CHI) CSC(CHI) PUB(CSC, CHI) Digital camera CHI = Cultural Heritage Institution CSC = Cultural Service Centre PUB = Publisher = workflow action = workflow action + REGNET module Digital camera CHI = Cultural Heritage Institution CSC = Cultural Service Centre PUB = Publisher = workflow action = workflow action + REGNET module Edit meta data & text Data Entry Edit meta data & text Data Entry Scan image Store in DB CD / DVD Web Kiosk Scan image Store in DB CD / DVD Web Kiosk Storyboard Scenario & Multimedia realisation Search & Retreival Electronic Publication Storyboard Scenario & Multimedia realisation Search & Retreival Electronic Publication Extra items Decision publication Extra items New acquisition Decision publication Decision to digitise existing collection New acquisition REGNET Final Project Review
WP 4 Cultural Service Centres - CSCs REGNET CSC Europe E.E.I.G. Consortium Data entry e-Auction e-Procurement e-Publishing e-Shop Information engineering Knowledge engineering Portal Search/retrieval Membership Networked Regional Cultural Service Centres Services CSC concept Business Technical Content Participants XML Themes Context Multi-channel -level -lingual Infrastructure Membership or user Archives Art Galleries Museums Libraries Component Suppliers ICT-Companies Collections Market Makers Art & Antique Dealers Educational Institutes Scientists Tourists Visitors Official bodies REGNET Final Project Review
Conclusion (1/2) Demonstration characteristics Number and variety of: - addressed domains - envisaged modules - partners Incorporation of emerging technologies: - topic maps - new open source elements Time consuming setting up of CSCs (a.o. legal issues) Bridging the technology gap; services oriented De facto CSC collaboration REGNET Final Project Review
Conclusion (2/2) Demonstration outcome Largely proved the viability and feasibility of: - the concept - the system by metrics and observation Provided solid structure for: - CH content management - operational deployment of services - legal issues to let CH organisations enter the digital era in their domains REGNET Final Project Review