260 likes | 378 Views
The Pricing of Carbon Emissions from the Business Perspective in Northeast Asia. May 27, 2013 Presenter: Xianbing LIU Senior Policy Researcher Kansai Research Centre/IGES, Japan. Background: The Project on MBIs (Market-based Instruments).
E N D
The Pricing of Carbon Emissions from the Business Perspective in Northeast Asia May 27, 2013 Presenter: Xianbing LIU Senior Policy Researcher Kansai Research Centre/IGES, Japan
Background:The Project on MBIs (Market-based Instruments) Basic thinking:a) Advantages of MBIs; b) Importance of clear and stable policy signals; c) Successful MBIs practices in Europe; d) Laggard policy progress in Asia; e) Core competence of IGES; f) Research field of KRC Geographical focus:Japan, China and the Republic of Korea Policy focus: Financial subsidies, carbon taxes and GHG emissions trading schemes Discussed in this presentation Overall objective: To support the related policy discussions from the business viewpoints in this region Shanghai Forum 2013
Climate Policies in the Three Countries Shanghai Forum 2013
Objectives of the Surveys in FY2011 • Monitor the company’s awareness and overall acceptability of energy • saving and climate policies, particularly the economic instruments; • 2) Estimate the company’s affordable carbon prices using the model of • willingness-to-pay (WTP) and MBDC format; • 3) Understand the barriers for the company’s energy saving investments • and responses to the emerging carbon pricing policies. • The surveys in China and Korea were conducted in FY2011. The survey • in Japan was arranged in FY2012 as a complementary one under the • MBIs project of KRC/IGES in the 5th phase (FY2010-2012). Shanghai Forum 2013
Main Items:◈ Basic information of the firms;◈ Firm’s energy use status;◈ MBDC format on the left;◈ Factors affecting firm’s cost affordability and policy awareness;◈ Awareness of policies and energy saving technologies;◈ Factors affecting firm’s decisions in energy saving investments;◈ Firm’s reactions to possible policy interventions;◈ Pay back time for energy saving investments;◈ Etc. MBDC Card for Model Estimations & Survey Items Five levels of acceptance 15 increase options in Energy costs Shanghai Forum 2013
Estimation Models for Individual Companies Mean value of Vi Affordable energy cost increase ratio, with a CDF F(r) Possibility for accept an increase threshold, rij An error term with a mean of zero Assumed a normal accumulative distribution with a mean of μi and a standard variance of σi A vector of determinant factors Shanghai Forum 2013
The Survey Areas in China Shanxi Province: 79 34 samples from other areas Shandong Province: 57 Shanghai Forum 2013
Distribution of Respondents in China 3 energy-intensive sectors mainly targeted in this survey Shanghai Forum 2013
Distribution of Samples in Korea Shanghai Forum 2013
The Survey Area in Japan ► Posted to all the 465 manufacturing companies with annual energy use over 1,500kl TOE; ►117 are members of Hyogo Environmental Protection Association; ► 348 are posted with the letter of Hyogo government; ► 72 association members responded; ►158 collected with the letter of Hyogo government; ►A total of 230 valid samples gathered. Shanghai Forum 2013
Distribution of Respondents in Hyogo, Japan Shanghai Forum 2013
Company’s Energy Use Structure in China 32% 62% 62% Shanghai Forum 2013
Energy Cost Ratios in Total Sales of Chinese Samples For large and medium firms: 20-30% of energy cost in production cost. Shanghai Forum 2013
Energy Use Structure of the Samples in Japan 73.9% 11.3% 43.2% 33.8% 49.7% 26% Shanghai Forum 2013
Affordability of the Samples in China (N=111) Two curves were simulated:One is the sum of easily acceptable + acceptable. The other is the sum of easily acceptable + acceptable + barely acceptable. The real affordable ratio shall be between these two curves. 50% of the samples corresponds to the ratios of 2.8% and 9.3% on the two curves. Shanghai Forum 2013
Affordability of Steel Companies in China (N=34) 50% of the samples corresponds to the ratios of 2.6% and 9.3% on the two curves. Shanghai Forum 2013
Affordability of All the Samples in Japan (N=153) 50% of the samples corresponds to the ratios of 0.6% and 3.2% on the two curves. Shanghai Forum 2013
Affordability of All the Samples in Korea (N=36) The R squared for regressions of the two sets of data is 0.9565 and 0.9721. Affordability on the part of 50% of the samples corresponds to energy cost increase ratios of0.6% and 2.3%. Shanghai Forum 2013
Distribution of Cost Affordability in China ◈ Significantly and negatively associated with competition level; ◈The large companies have higher affordability. Shanghai Forum 2013
Calculations of Affordable Carbon Prices in China Shanghai Forum 2013
Distribution of Cost Affordability in Japan In addition: Iron & steel sector (N=11): Mean of μ: 1.5% Mean of std. dev. of μ: 3.1%. Electronics sector (N=12): Mean of μ: 2.6% Mean of std. dev. of μ: 3.7%. Shanghai Forum 2013
Carbon Prices Affordable for Companies in Hyogo 5-13$/t-CO2 Big gap with the carbon price needed for realizing Copenhagen pledge of Japan (30-50$/t-CO2) Shanghai Forum 2013
Distribution of Cost Affordability in Korea *: Lower (upper) confidence limit held at minimum (maximum) of sample. Shanghai Forum 2013
Carbon Prices Affordable for Korean Companies Kwon and Heo (2010): 36,545KRW/t-CO2 (about 31$/t-CO2) for achieving the national mid-term target of Korea. KIFP (Korea Institute of Public Finance)(2008): 25EURO/t-CO2 and equivalent to 31,328KRW/ t-CO2 KIFP (2010): Suggested a carbon tax rate at the level of 1/8of above in the first proposal. Shanghai Forum 2013
A Brief Summary ◆ This presentation summarizes the estimation results of carbon prices affordable for the companies in China, Japan and Korea; ◆ The MBDC format and WTP model, traditionally used for the individuals, were innovatively applied; ◆ The sampled Chinese companies show relatively higher affordability to energy cost increases than the companies of Japan and Korea; ◆ The carbon prices affordable for the companies in China and Japan are similar at a range of 5-13$/t-CO2, which is around 2-3 times of Korean companies; ◆ The estimated affordable carbon prices are meaningful for the ongoing discussions of carbon pricing policies in this region; ◆ Besides carbon prices, the viewpoints of businesses on the other policy attributes shall be measured for the design of appropriate carbon pricing tools; ◆ The policy gap for the realization of national carbon mitigation targets in medium and long term shall be further identified and bridged; ◆ The possibility for policy integration and coordination at regional level is an essential topic for discussions. Shanghai Forum 2013
Thank you! Contacts: Xianbing LIU KRC/IGES Tel: +81-78-262-6634 Fax: +81-78-262-6635 E-Mail: liu@iges.or.jp URL: http://www.iges.or.jp Shanghai Forum 2013