1 / 13

UNDP-GEF: WHAT WE'VE HEARD

UNDP-GEF: WHAT WE'VE HEARD. Public Participation · NGOs and CBOS can be substantively engaged in helping to address transboundary issues · Broad public participation can help build regulatory success and legitimacy

abdul-england
Download Presentation

UNDP-GEF: WHAT WE'VE HEARD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UNDP-GEF: WHAT WE'VE HEARD

  2. Public Participation • ·NGOs and CBOS can be substantively engaged in helping to address transboundary issues • ·Broad public participation can help build regulatory success and legitimacy • ·There is still a need to better network the NGOs involved in and interested in the GEF.

  3. Donors • ·Importance of maintaining continuity of international support to International Waters programmes. • ·Value of country-endorsed SAP to strengthen donor buy-in to supporting programme implementation.

  4. TDA/SAPs • ·Importance of involving stakeholders responsible for water bodies problems in TDA/SAP process. • ·The logical underpinnings of TDA/SAP are basically sound; projects should be allowed the flexibility to test, adapt and improve on the TDA/SAP process, e.g. no ‘template’.

  5. Information • ·Transparency and openness critical in sharing information on transboundary water resources to facilitate feedback of information into decision processes. • Sustainability • ·Need to build project management capacity of local/national constituencies so these can be sustained following end of donor support.

  6. Project Development • ·No specific formula or ‘appropriate’ time frame for project preparation; necessary time and resources should be committed to ensure full participation of all relevant stakeholders in project design. • ·Need to involve GEF OFPs very early in project preparation process so have their buy-in at time of project submission. • ·Progress still to be made in expediting GEF and IA project cycles. • ·A ‘cookbook’ style GEF project preparation manual would be a very useful product for many GEF constituencies.

  7. This Conference • ·Very useful and constructive • ·More break-outs, fewer plenaries • ·More informal interactive and free time • ·Need for GEF and IA follow-up on several areas • ·Note to Climate Change and Biodiversity: Try it---you’ll like it!!

  8. GEF IW Biennial Conference: A Poll • 1 1. How many people learned something new that will help them in their future work in International Waters?

  9. GEF IW Biennial Conference: A Poll • 2. How many people met someone who they expect will be able to help them in their future work in International Waters?

  10. GEF IW Biennial Conference: A Poll • 3. How many people feel they helped someone else with an International Waters issue during the conference?

  11. GEF IW Biennial Conference: A Poll • 4.How many people made one or more new friends?

  12. GEF IW Biennial Conference: A Poll • 5.How many people entered into a new romantic relationship?

  13. GEF IW Biennial Conference: A Poll • 6.How many people will from this point onwards drink Pepsi instead of Coke?

More Related