1 / 38

Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling

Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling. CE 451/551. Outline. Freight Planning Impetus Activities Case study Freight Modeling NHI notes Iowa model example. Big changes, last 50 yrs. 1960s intermodalism (containers) 1980ish rail and trucking deregulation Lower rates

abdul-sawyer
Download Presentation

Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Freight Transportation Planning and Modeling CE 451/551

  2. Outline Freight Planning Impetus Activities Case study Freight Modeling NHI notes Iowa model example

  3. Big changes, last 50 yrs. 1960s intermodalism (containers) 1980ish rail and trucking deregulation Lower rates Greater competition Concentration of service Integrated logistics (supply chain management) Need for reliable networks (JIT)

  4. Big Changes … Resulted in … freight bill drops from 15% of GDP in 1980 to 11% in 1990 ($$$) Improved transportation Cost savings Competitive edge freight transportation intensity ratio of total ton-miles to total Gross Domestic Product 0.59 in 1970 to 0.38 in 2002 (2000 dollars) suggests increase in freight transportation productivity Truck trips to grow much faster than auto trips ISTEA/TEA21/SAFETEA-LU …MPO Freight Planning Mandate

  5. MPO Freight Planning Goals (from SCAG) 1. Economic Efficiency; 2. Congestion Mitigation; 3. Safety Improvement; 4. Air Quality Improvement; and 5. System Security.

  6. Freight Stakeholders National Air Freight Assoc American Assoc of Port Authorities American Trucking Associations Assoc American Railroads Intermodal Assoc of North America National Assoc of Manufacturers National Industrial Transportation League National Private Truck Council State/Local Iowa Motor Truck Association manufacturers, builders, wholesalers and retailers

  7. How to make the freight planning process work???

  8. ID and make Improvements Brainstorming and prioritizing (e.g., KC distributed cameras to truck drivers) Improvements should be quickly implemented (e.g., Signing, signal timing, corner widening) MPO needs to develop positive track record

  9. Effective Planning Approaches Ad hoc working groups (task forces) OK Corridor studies (e.g. TH10) Modeling/data collection (private!) Trust is important, results in … Willingness to provide data Data are not misused Unnecessary data are not collected

  10. Appreciate Perspectives … MPO long range is 20+ years Carrier long range is 6 –12 months! MPO may not fully understand “time is money” Shippers/carriers may not understand planning process and jargon Release of proprietary information may result in loss of competitive position Shippers/carriers participate to be “good corporate citizens” Good for planners to visit shipper/carrier facilities to learn – gain respect

  11. Maintaining Private Sector Interest Time management Education/communication Short term results Consider participant interests Review group focus/purpose Consider appointing a well known/respected member of the private freight community as chair

  12. Example of Public/Private Freight Planning See: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/freightplanning/

  13. Chicago MPO (CATS) Longest history of freight planning, dedicated staff, models Intermodal advisory task force Motor carrier travel surveys Separate trip table for trucks ID bottlenecks Draft intermodal element of TIP Inventory facilities and resources Projects 55% increase in truck travel 1990-2020

  14. CATS Task Force Recommendations Operational restrictions/system management measures: enforcing curbside management restrictions, promoting off-peak travel, not restricting truck access to central business districts; Vehicle restrictions: considerations for multi-unit and combination vehicles; Viaduct clearances; Strategic and supplemental regional arterial programs: accommodating through trips not well served by expressways; Driver information and incident management: including ITS considerations; and Intermodal facilities/industrial areas: improving access to terminals and improving intermodal transfers

  15. CATS Specific Bottlenecks … Signs and signals; Lane width and turning bays; Speed limits; Merges and ramps; Viaducts and grade crossings; Access to terminals; and Restrictions, rules, regulations, and others

  16. CATS IFIGIS (Intermodal Facilities Inventory GIS) Intermodal Facilities Rail Network Road Network Trucking Terminals Container Depots Water Terminals and Ports Public Use Airports Operational Constraints National Highway System Connectors Background Geography

  17. CATS: Benefits of Participation ensure against rash and unwise policies, such as closing an expressway terminal preserve the existing competitive balance between private companies have working relationships with CATS and with other companies staff can speak the freight sector's language and is aggressive at soliciting the members' input

  18. Statewide Freight Modeling From NHI notes

  19. Freight Model Improvement Program http://www.fmip.gov/

More Related