1 / 10

NTeQ Philosophy vs. The Traditional Classroom

NTeQ Philosophy vs. The Traditional Classroom. Brant Andreassen March 27, 2006. I like my new telephone, my computer works just fine, my calculator is perfect, but Lord, I miss my mind!  ~Author Unknown. Introduction.

abe
Download Presentation

NTeQ Philosophy vs. The Traditional Classroom

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NTeQ Philosophy vs. The Traditional Classroom Brant Andreassen March 27, 2006

  2. I like my new telephone, my computer works just fine, my calculator is perfect, but Lord, I miss my mind!  ~Author Unknown

  3. Introduction • In this age of the modern classroom, teachers are bombarded with technological advances that can compliment or inhibit instruction. • In this presentation, we’ll take a look at the similarities and differences between the NTeQ Model and the traditional classroom.

  4. NTeQ Model Technologically literate Uses technology as a tool for teaching Creates a multi-dimensional learning environment Serves as a facilitator to student learning Is proactive when managing technology Traditional Classroom Uses technology for drill and practice activities Is the “giver” of information – may lecture frequently Is reactive in managing technology Lacks technology skills Teacher

  5. NTeQ Actively engaged in learning process Serves as “researcher” – seeking knowledge on his/her own Is technologically competent Traditional Classroom Waits to receive knowledge from teacher Possesses few technological skills Is a passive participant to learning Student

  6. NTeQ Is used as a tool – does not stand alone Functions in tangent with students’ abilities Provides for meaningful learning Traditional Classroom Used primarily for low-level applications Seen as an “add-on” to the curriculum May sit idle in back of classroom Computer

  7. NTeQ Lessons are designed to keep students actively involved Students play a large role in the lesson Objectives are meaningful and authentic Traditional Classroom Lessons are designed and implemented without modifications Students are led “through” a lesson – may not be actively engaged in their learning Lesson

  8. NTeQ Students and teachers work together to solve complex problems The computer is seen as a tool – but is not the focal point of the classroom Traditional Classroom The teacher provides for the students’ needs – students are passive observers The computer is used as a “center” or during free time Environment

  9. Conclusion • It is important to remember that the NTeQ Model is not designed to be used for every lesson. • Like other lesson models, the teacher must weigh many factors into deciding how to prepare and present the information to the students. • The NTeQ Model can be successful when implemented with integrity.

  10. References Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2005). Integrating Computer Technology into the Classroom (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

More Related