1 / 17

Multi-project analyses of ice nuclei relation to aerosols and ice in clouds

Multi-project analyses of ice nuclei relation to aerosols and ice in clouds . 1 Colorado State University 2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

abia
Download Presentation

Multi-project analyses of ice nuclei relation to aerosols and ice in clouds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Multi-project analyses of ice nuclei relation to aerosols and ice in clouds 1 Colorado State University 2Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Acknowledgments: NSF (various). DOE-ARM (Grant No. DE-FG02-09ER64772), NASA-MAP (Grant NNG06GB60G), NASA NIP (Prenni), DOE Climate Change Prediction Program, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Dave Hudak, Ulrich Poeschl. Submitted to PNAS: DeMott, P.J. , A.J. Prenni, X. Liu, M.D. Petters, C.H. Twohy, M.S. Richardson, T. Eidhammer, S.M. Kreidenweis, D.C. Rogers, Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate. Anthony J. Prenni1 P. J. DeMott1 and X. Liu2 DOE AWG

  2. Overview of today’s talk • Measurement description • Do IN predict ice formation in clouds in the situations absent of secondary influences? • Database from almost a decade of ice nuclei (IN) measurements at surface sites and via aircraft. • Relations between aerosol properties and IN number concentrations in mixed phase clouds. • Some first applications toward global modeling studies. DOE AWG

  3. Real-time atmospheric measurement of IN - Continuous flow diffusion chamber (CFDC) * -6 < T < -40°C Total residence time ~6s OPC * PM1 contributes ~50% of IN number at -15 °C Santachiara, G., et al., Atmospheric particles acting as Ice Forming Nuclei in different size ranges, Atmos. Res. (2009), doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2009.08.004 DOE AWG

  4. Sampling methodologies aircraft aerosol sample inlet CVI inlet (aerosol from evaporated cloud particles) Ground-based aerosol sample inlet, Brazil DOE AWG

  5. Ice in Clouds Experiment (ICE-L, 2007): Orographic wave clouds used as natural laboratories to study ice initiation CVI inlet sampling Radar/lidar profiling Ambient inlet sampling Case studies indicating IN ≈ Ice in clouds (Paul Field’s Presentation on Wednesday + submitted J. Atmos. Sci.; Eidhammer et al. 2009) DOE AWG

  6. Ice nuclei (CVI sample) versus ice concentration in warm frontal clouds during Pacific Dust Experiment (PACDEX;17 May 2007) Tamb ≈ -25°C TCFDC ≈ -25°C DOE AWG

  7. Projects Relating IN to Aerosol DOE AWG

  8. Ice nuclei concentrations • 5-30 min. averages • Processed from 100-105% RH • Processed from -10 °C to -35 °C • Limited to ~constant Temp (5 °C) and RH (3%) • Limited to ~constant altitude (500 m) • Clear air measurements only, except for ICE-L, where CVI residuals were also characterized DOE AWG

  9. Ice nuclei concentrations DOE AWG

  10. Strong IN dependence on aerosol concentrations in selective size and temperature range (-32±2°C) PACDEX project Berezinski et al. (1986), extrapolated -32°C Georgii and Kleinjung (1967), -21°C, > 0.6 mm DOE AWG

  11. Size and temperature dependence in all CFDC projects can be parameterized -30 to -35°C -25 to -30°C -20 to -25°C -10 to -20°C DOE AWG

  12. All Data: Predicted versus Measured Param. predicts ~2/3 data within factor 2 MOCA-2009

  13. Ice nucleation parameterizations • Meyers et al. (1992): nin= exp(12.96(Si-1)- 0.639) (no links to aerosol properties) • DeMott et al. (2009): ( T, naer>0.5mm diameter) a = 0.00001968 b = -0.0167(Tk-273.15) + 0.2877 Ice supersaturation dependence only DOE AWG

  14. Single column model (SCAM3) simulation of M-PACE Arctic Stratus Observations  Ice water content Cloud water content Liu et al. 2-moment microphys. + Meyers  As above new param DOE AWG

  15. Global model (CAM3) 5-year simulations, annual averages Total liquid water path Total ice water path Total cloud cover DOE AWG Boulder, CO

  16. Summary • Ice formation predicted by IN measurements in absence of homogeneous freezing and secondary ice nucleation. • IN concentrations in mixed-phase cloud regime relates to larger/coarse mode aerosol concentrations and temperature. • Global model simulation sensitivity to IN is quite strong using this information. • Studies of IN compositional dependencies continue • Will use ISDAC dataset to test parameterization DOE AWG

  17. Project average IN vs ice in clouds from FIRE-ACE/SHEBA (1998) and M-PACE (2004) ○ IN FIRE-ACE/SHEBA ● cloud ice FIRE-ACE/SHEBA □ IN M-PACE ■ cloud ice M-PACE Cloud ice based on 2D-C probe > 125 mm FIRE-ACE/SHEBA ice data: Gultepe et al., 2001 M-PACE ice data: McFarquhar et al., 2007 DOE AWG

More Related