1 / 15

Significance of the Seismic Anomaly on the Core-Mantle Boundary

Significance of the Seismic Anomaly on the Core-Mantle Boundary. By Shawn Dubois. Contents. Detection Characteristics Nature of the seismic anomaly What is the D’’ layer? Significance. Detection. Measuring traveling times of seismic waves Waves originate from earthquakes

abra
Download Presentation

Significance of the Seismic Anomaly on the Core-Mantle Boundary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Significance of the Seismic Anomaly on the Core-Mantle Boundary By Shawn Dubois

  2. Contents • Detection • Characteristics • Nature of the seismic anomaly • What is the D’’ layer? • Significance

  3. Detection • Measuring traveling times of seismic waves • Waves originate from earthquakes • The travel times can be used to calculate the seismic velocity of underground layers in the Earth

  4. Detection • Snell’s Law: Sin(i1)/V1=Sin(i2)/2

  5. Characteristics of the Anomaly • 200 to 300 km thick layer with a large seismic velocity drop • 5-40 km thick ULVZ (ultra low velocity zone) • Irregular surface • Anomaly referred to as D’’ layer

  6. D’’ cross-section • D’’ layer with rough surface on the CMB • Peaks in D’’ surface thought to be linked to convection cells

  7. Nature of seismic anomaly • Temperature dependent (increase of 500 K in a range of ~150 km) • Layer viscosity reduced by 4 orders of magnitude

  8. What is the Nature of the D’’ Layer • Still open to debate • Subducted crustal material lying on the CMB • Perovskite ((Fe,Mg)SiO3)  Post-Perovskite phase change • Partial melting of the mantle • Partial crystallization of the core (increased amount of lighter material in the outer core due to crystallization of Fe onto the inner core) • Combination of some/all?

  9. Perovskite Phase Change • At the conditions found just above the CMB (in the D’’ layer), perovskite can change from its Pv phase to a pPv phase. • Changes the anisotropy of the system

  10. Material Transfer from the D’’ Layer to the Outer Core • Infiltration of iron along grain boundaries • Chemical reactions between liquid iron and solid oxides and silicates at high pressures • Extraction of FeO and Si from the lower mantle into the core, and returning of Fe3+ into the mantle

  11. Reactions • 2(Mg,Fe)O [Mw] FeO [liq alloy] + MgO [Mw] • 2(Mg,Fe)SiO3  MgSiO3 + SiO2 + FeO [liq alloy] • (Fe1-x,Mgx)SiO3 + 3(1-x)Fe [liqalloy] xMgSiO3 + (1-x)FeO [liq alloy] + (1-x)Fe3Si [liq alloy] • 3Fe2+O [Mw or Pv] Feo [liqalloy] + Fe3+2O3 [perovskite] • These reactions might be causing the oxydation of the mantle over time.

  12. Influences of Fluid Inflow • Fluid infiltration and reactions are relatively rapid (10^3 to 10^6 years) • Dispersal of the reaction products is longer • Thus, material accumulates as a result of the reaction. • Increases iron content in the mantle, thus increasing its conductivity. • Causes influences on the planetary magnetic field • Possible heterogenies in the D’’ layer may cause screening of the magnetic field

  13. Possible Source of Mantle Plumes • The D’’ layer may be the source of mantle plumes. • Thickest beneath zones of upwelling in the mantle and thinnest under downwelling. • Heterogenies swept upwards from warmer areas, causing material to rise to the surface and cause a hot spot.

  14. Problems • Difficulty to reproduce exact conditions in laboratories • Impossibility to sample in situ • Information limited greatly to seismic data • Any upwelled samples would have passed through phase boundaries and probably have been altered

  15. Conclusion • Presence of a drastic decrease in seismic velocities along the CMB • Due mainly to large change in temperature and possibly to phase changes • Location of material exchange between the mantle and the core • Possible source of mantle plumes • Due to lack of information, it is impossible to develop accurate models

More Related