290 likes | 388 Views
Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID. Michelle LeBrun-Griffin griffin@ctserc.org Kim Mearman mearman@ctserc.org. PJ Settlement Goals. Increase in the % of students with MR (ID) who are placed in regular classes (80% or more of day with nondisabled peers)
E N D
Bridgeport’s Data on Students With ID Michelle LeBrun-Griffin griffin@ctserc.org Kim Mearman mearman@ctserc.org
PJ Settlement Goals • Increase in the % of students with MR (ID) who are placed in regular classes (80% or more of day with nondisabled peers) • Reduction in the disparate identification of students by LEA, race, ethnicity, gender • Increase in the mean and median % of the school day spent with nondisabled peers
PJ Settlement Goals • Increase in the % of students who attend their “home school” (school they would otherwise attend if not disabled) • Increase in the % of students who participate in school-sponsored extracurricular activities with nondisabled students
Goal #1 An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disabilitywho are placed in regular classes, as measured by the federal definition (i.e. 80% or more of the school day with non-disabled students).
Goal #3 An increase in the mean and median percent of the school day that students with mental retardation or intellectual disability spend with non-disabled students. (TWNDP)
Education Location of Students With ID 2001-2002 School Year Data
Education Location of Students With ID 2001-2002 School Year Data
Average Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data
Percentages of Time For Students With ID With Non-Disabled 2001-2002 School Year Data
Goal #2 A reduction in the disparate identification of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability by LEA, by racial group, by ethnic group or by gender group.
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Gender 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By Racial/Ethnic Group 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID By English Proficiency 2001-2002 School Year Data
Goal #4 An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who attend the school they would attend if not disabled (“home school”).
Goal #5 An increase in the percent of students with mental retardation or intellectual disability who participate in school-sponsoredextracurricular activities with non-disabled students.
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Total Enrollment 2001-2002 School Year Data
Prevalence Rate of Students With ID Within Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data
Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data
Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data
Students With ID Reported As Exiting Special Education 2001-2002 School Year Data
Staffing Ratios Per 1,000 School District Students 2001-2002 School Year Data