1 / 15

Benchmarking Critical Function Prototype

Benchmarking Critical Function Prototype. Formula SAE Josh Smith, Ben Opfermann, Eliot Moellmer. Benchmarking. Major systems . Critical Function Prototype. Front impact structure What we expect to learn. Schedule. Budget. Benchmarking. Major Systems Engine selection Suspension design

abril
Download Presentation

Benchmarking Critical Function Prototype

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BenchmarkingCritical Function Prototype Formula SAE Josh Smith, Ben Opfermann, Eliot Moellmer

  2. Benchmarking • Major systems Critical Function Prototype • Front impact structure • What we expect to learn Schedule Budget

  3. Benchmarking Major Systems • Engine selection • Suspension design • Overall weight

  4. Engine Selection Honda CBR F3 600 • Pros • System knowledge • Parts availability • Cost • Cons • Carbureted • Cylinder head angle www.powersports.honda.com

  5. Engine Selection Honda CBR 600RR • Pros • Digital fuel injection • Vertical exhaust position • Overall weight • Cons • Complex injection • Cost www.powersports.honda.com

  6. Suspension Design PushrodSuspension • Pros • Progressive ratios • Lower drag coefficient • Cons • More complex mounting www.RenaultF1.com

  7. Overall Weight • Range • 400 - 700 lbs • Ideal weight 410 lbs • Realistic weight 470 lbs

  8. Critical Function Prototype • Impact Attenuator • Design • Advantages / Disadvantages

  9. Impact Attenuator • Absorb Impact • Protect Driver and Major Structure Pro Formula Mazda Test Footage

  10. Design • Past • Material • Mounting • Proposed • Material • Mounting Created by Josh Smith

  11. Advantages Lower Weight Better Absorption Low Energy Storage Disadvantages Higher Cost Needs Protection

  12. Schedule Up Coming Deadlines • Design 10/19 • Modeling 10/28 • Final Model 11/1 • Build Start 11/17

  13. Budget Maximum Budget < $25,000 Current Spending • 12 SAE student memberships $120.00 Projected Spending • Brakes $ 650.00 • Suspension and shocks $ 2500.00 • Frame/Body $ 3500.00 • Steering system $ 750.00 • Wheels/Tires $ 1500.00 • Instruments/Wiring $ 8000.00 • Total $ 16900.00 Total Fundraising YTD $ 6380.00 • Donated engine $ 900.00 • Student version solid works $ 1680.00 • Football games $ 2800.00 • Tooling block $ 1000.00

  14. Engine Honda CBR600RR Suspension Pushrod Weight 470 lbs. Purpose Proposed Design Benchmarking Prototyping Schedule Budget

  15. 2007 Formula SAE Team Contact Information Josh Smith UofUfSAE@gmail.com Ben Opfermann B.Opfermann@utah.edu Eliot Moellmer Emoellmer@comcast.net

More Related