180 likes | 450 Views
Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in high risk trauma patients. Inferior vena cava filters, pharmaceuticals, vasocompressive devices . Sean Beard, Jimmy Crick, Ashton Curry, Erica Essex. PICO QUESTION. P: Trauma patients at high risk for PE I: Use of inferior vena cava filter
E N D
Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism in high risk trauma patients Inferior vena cava filters, pharmaceuticals, vasocompressive devices Sean Beard, Jimmy Crick, Ashton Curry, Erica Essex
PICO QUESTION • P: Trauma patients at high risk for PE • I: Use of inferior vena cava filter • C: Prophylactic pharmaceuticals and vasocompressive devices • O: Incidence of PE
OBJECTIVES • Background • PE background & incidence • IVC filters (IVCF) • Why trauma patients? • Indications vs. Contraindications • Effectiveness • Conclusions • Clinical Relevance • Risks associated with IVCF http://www.uwmedicine.org/Patient-Care/eHealth-Articles/PublishingImages/Inferior-Vena-Cava-Filter.jpg
BACKGROUND http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-_wL3XWZ1I&app=desktop
IVCF PLACEMENT http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvtHCMBm0SA&app=desktop http://www.mbcgraphics.com/images/img_port_ivcfilter.jpg
GROSS ANATOMY LAB Thanks to Dr. Hanks and table 2.1
IMPORTANCE • PE’s are common (Rajasekhar, 2011) • PE’s are deadly (Rajasekhar, 2011) • PE’s are preventable (Stefanidis, 2006) http://medicalcenter.osu.edu/patientcare/healthcare_services/lung_diseases/lung/embolism/Pages/index.aspx
PATIENT PROFILE Types of high risk patients Factors increasing venous thrombotic event (VTE) risk History of venous thrombotic event Prolonged immobility Pelvic trauma Age Vascular injury Obesity Blood transfusions • SCI • TBI • Fractures • Pelvic, acetabulum, tibia-fibula, femoral shaft, foot/ankle (Carlin, 2002) (Helling, 2009)
STANDARD OF CARE • Prophylactic low dose subcutaneous heparin (LDH) and sequential compression devices (SCD) • Effectively reduces the incidence of DVT or PE to <10% • 35% of trauma patients are unable to have SCD • 14% of high risk trauma patients unable to have LDH (Sekharan, 2001) (Khansarinia, 1995)
INDICATIONS FOR USE OF IVCF • Patients with known VTE • Anticoagulants contraindicated • Recurrent PE despite anticoagulant therapy • Hx of complication related to anticoagulant therapy (Young, 2010) (Rajasekhar, 2011) • Inserted within 48 hours of injury (Carlin, 2002)
EFFECTIVENESS • IVCF’s are considered safe and reduce incidence of VTE (Kidane, 2012) • Compared to matched controls, PE incidence was significantly lower in IVCF group (Rajasekhar, 2011) http://www.uofmmedicalcenter.org/fv/groups/public/documents/images/277293.jpg
EFFECTIVENESS • After 5 year follow-up, IVCF placement is safe and durable in young active trauma patients (Sekharan, 2001) • In patients with IVCF, compared to no IVCF: • 12 days: 22% decrease in incidence of PE • 2 years: 50% decrease in incidence of PE (Decousus, 1998)
POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS WITH IVCF • Erosion through vena cava wall • Filter migration • Filter infection • Thrombus formation caudal to IVCF • Inferior vena cava occlusion (Stefanidis, 2006) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlaDA_FRA48
CONCLUSION • In trauma patients who are at high risk for PE IVCF’s are more effective than standard of care at preventing the incidence of a PE • In patients for whom standard of care is contraindicated IVCF placement is safe and recommended
RELEVANCE TO PHYSICAL THERAPY • Awareness of IVCF • Indicates patient is at high risk for VTE • Prolonged IVCF use correlated with increased incidence of DVT • Wells criteria • Recognition of IVCF complication
REFERENCES Carlin AM, Tyburski JG, Wilson RF, Steffes C. Prophylactic and therapeutic inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary emboli in trauma patients. Arch. Surg.2002;137(5): 521–5. DecoususH, Leizorovicz A. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;338(7):409–415. HellingTS, Kaswan S, Miller SL, Tretter JF. Practice patterns in the use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in a trauma population: a single-center experience. J. Trauma. 2009;67(6):1293–6. KhansariniaS, Dennis JW, Veldenz HC, Butcher JL, Hartland L. Prophylactic Greenfield filter placement in selected high-risk trauma patients. J. Vasc. Surg. 1995;22(3):231–5. Kidney B, Madani AM, Vogt K, Girotti M, Malthaner R a, Parry NG. The use of prophylactic inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: a systematic review. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2012;43(5):542–7.
REFERENCES Rajasekhar A, Lottenberg R, Lottenberg L, Liu H, Ang D. Pulmonary embolism prophylaxis with inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: a systematic review using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis. 2011;32(1):40–6. Sekharan J, Dennis JW, Miranda FE, et al. Long-term follow-up of prophylactic greenfield filters in multisystem trauma patients. J. Trauma. 2001;51(6):1087–90. Stefanidis D, Paton BL, Jacobs DG, et al. Extended interval for retrieval of vena cava filters is safe and may maximize protection against pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Surg. 2006;192(6):789–94. Young T, Tang H, Hughes R. Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010; (2):CD006212.