1 / 32

Modified Gravity: answer to Dark Matter/Energy?

Modified Gravity: answer to Dark Matter/Energy?. HongSheng Zhao Univ. of St Andrews, UK. Late acceleration+3 rd peak Einstein’s Eq. needs fix. RHS ⇒ Dark energy + DM e.g., Vaccum energy, Chaplygin gas 2. LHS ⇒ Modified gravity

acacia
Download Presentation

Modified Gravity: answer to Dark Matter/Energy?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Modified Gravity: answer to Dark Matter/Energy? HongSheng Zhao Univ. of St Andrews, UK

  2. Late acceleration+3rd peakEinstein’s Eq. needs fix • RHS ⇒ Dark energy + DM e.g., Vaccum energy, Chaplygin gas 2. LHS ⇒ Modified gravity e.g., 1/R gravity (Carroll et al., 2003) dominates late

  3. Bekenstein’s TeVeS for MOND =0 a0]2 ~ 3

  4. Deflection by φDM ~ φTeVeS Bekenstein (2004), Angus, Famaey, Zhao (2006) • Galactic Potential  = lum+φTeVeS = lum+ φDM ds2 = (1+2) dt2 - (1-2) ( dx2 + dy2 + dz2 ) • DM + DE --> Baryon-tracking Scalar field

  5. Need Modified Gravity ~ Dark Matter (gDM/glum ).gDM ~ a0~ 1/2 Bruneton, Famaey, Gentile, Nipoti, Zhao (2006)

  6. A Fake Hybrid Spiral Galaxy MOND fails to fit(Good !!) DM fits fine Stars Gas Gas Stars (with smaller M/L) Scarpa; http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/astro-ph/0601478

  7. Polarisation ~ Bound Charge ~ Dark Matter ~ Scalar field + + + - - +Q - - + + ▼. [s▼φ] = 4Glum = ▼. ▼Φlum Matter-tracking Dielectric s ~ ▼φ /a0, a0 ~ 1/2

  8. Predict Cosmology without further tuning • Constraints: z=1010 (BBN) tBBN = 1sec  initial cond. z=1100 (CMB) Horizon 1 degree z=0 (LRR) Gravity varies <4x10-13 yr-1

  9. Match D(z) without Λ nor CDM! Dielectric s ~ dφ/dt a0, a0 ~ 1/2

  10. Matching Horizon, Distance, H0, BBN, … (Zhao et al. 06)

  11. Falsifiable Beyond d /d R • d  /d Z • Vertical oscillation of Sun-like stars • d2/d R2 • Roche Lobes of star clusters & dwarf galaxies • d  /d t • Hubble expansion/CMB/structure formation

  12. A baryonic TeVeS is incomplete • Fail in • Globular clusters (zero DM) • Galaxy clusters (lots of DM, e.g., 1 ev neutrino) • Some lenses elliptical galaxies (with DM core) • Falsifiable from vertical force near Sun (GAIA).

  13. Lensing as usual, but in strong regime

  14. Compare with CDM • Smaller image separation < 0.3 (GM/a0)1/2~ 3 kpc for M~1011 • Longer time delay (or need H0 closer to 70):

  15. Lensing angle distribution in TeVeS Chen & Zhao (2006, ApJ, Lett. submitted)

  16. Not Perfect Zhao, Bacon, Taylor, Horne (2006,MNRAS)

  17. Skordis et al. (2005),PRL • Fit WMAP,SDSS if neutrino is massive (~0.17) (← first peak location)

  18. MOND as fortune-teller to DM/DE • Why/When it works? • Often (LSB/SNIa) • but not always (globular/galaxy clusters)! • E.g., Hydrogen Balmer Line = (1/22 - 1/n2) R leads to new physics: quantum/duality concepts of particle/wave • (gDM /gDM ).gDM ~ a0 ~  ½ clues to DM/DE, even better physics [duality of gravity?] • All structures in universe are characterized by the same internal energy density . Why?

  19. Why gravity = a0 somewhere inevery object? • GlobularCluster, MolecularCloud, dwarf, Ellip, X-Cluster •  ½ ~a0 ~ Velocity2 /Length scale ~ cH0/6 ~ 100Msun/pc2 • A good theory (DM/DE/MOND…) should explain this!

  20. Solar System ? ? Tides/vertical force Rot. curves HSB/LSB Lensing by Ellip/Clusters Hubble Expansion/CMB ???? Update Scores LCDM TeVeS-MOND Stay Tuned!

  21. Cluster Masses from X-rays MOND says from velocity dispersion MTotal / MGas. ~ 2 Need 2 eV neutrinos in clusters of galaxies. Sanders & McGaugh: http://cul.arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0204521

  22. Neutrino Mass Limits Mνe< 2.2 eV Tritium decay endpoint measurements (But much better will come from KATRIN ~2007). A much lower mass limit would rule out neutrinos being a significant DM mass in galactic clusters. Mνµ< 170 KeV π+ → µ+ + νµ Mντ< 18 MeV τ- → 2 π- + π+ + ντ (Mνe + Mνµ + Mντ) < .68 eV WMAP (March 2006 results for 3 years of data), but uses Einstein’s Field Eqn. for structure formation (ie: Newton, which is not the MOND force law). Maybe MOND + the galactic cluster results are the first measurement that the typical neutrino mass is ~2 eV ! (G.Godfrey 2006)

  23. Fit Non-spherical Lens with Shear Disk Lens J2004-1349 H0 ~ (R22 -R12 ) (1-k)/ (t2-t1) f(zs,zl) ~ 70 Shan & Zhao (in prep.)

  24. Toy Lens with 3-baryon centres Density map Kappa map Angus, Famaey, Zhao (2006, MNRAS)

  25. Duality of Gravity: DM-MOND • Acceleration V2/R = -▼Φ = E • Polarisation▼φ = P = D – E = -▼Φlum + ▼Φ Tracking ▼. [s ▼φ]= 4Glum = ▼. ▼Φlum Dielectric s ~ ▼φ /a0, a0 ~ 1/2 Baryon = Free Charge DM = Polarisation

  26. Predict Cosmology …without further tuning

  27. CMB peaks: sensitive to baryon and dark matter B h2(shift of zero point of oscillation) → first peak height  second peak height  Mh2  (increases the depth of potential well decreases radiation relative to matter(ISW)) → first peak height  second peak → third peak height 

  28. trouble with higher (second and third) peaks of CMB(Slosar-Melchiorri-Silk,2005) (←Silk damping for baryons) WMAP/Boomerang WMAP

More Related