70 likes | 243 Views
Some Preliminary Results. Disclaimer: Please do not distribute outside of COSYSMO Working Group. These results are very preliminary. E-mail me if you have questions or need clarification. Ricardo Valerdi Center for Software Engineering University of Southern California.
E N D
Some Preliminary Results Disclaimer: Please do not distribute outside of COSYSMO Working Group. These results are very preliminary. E-mail me if you have questions or need clarification. Ricardo Valerdi Center for Software Engineering University of Southern California
Functional Size vs. SE Effort • 20 data points displayed (out of a dataset of 22) • Included here is “raw” unadjusted data • Most points are intra-company homogeneous • Project size and hours are log transformed • Common differences in counting requirements and operational scenarios Breaking point may tell us something about the diseconomies of scale in Systems Engineering
Size Driver Influence on Effort # of Interfaces and # of Algorithms drivers proved to be insignificant
Life Cycle Scope of the Model From ISO/IEC15288 Most of the project data reported for COSYSMO covers the first 4 phases of the ISO lifecycle
COSYSMO Data Sources Still hopeful for: Aerospace Corp. (El Segundo, CA), BAE Systems IEWS (Nashua, NH), SAIC (McLean, VA), Boeing (Long Beach, CA), Northrop Grumman TASC (Chantilly, VA)
Thanks to: • Gary Thomas, Raytheon • John Rieff, Raytheon • Garry Roedler, LMCO • Jim Cain, BAE Systems • Merrill Palmer, BAE Systems • Paul Frenz, General Dynamics • Sheri Molineaux, General Dynamics • Steven Wong, Northrop Grumman
We All Want This Phase To End! Target delivery date for COSYSMO: August 2005