310 likes | 323 Views
This project assesses the child protection system in Iraq/Kurdistan in two phases, aiming to improve the quality of services provided by three social protection centers. It examines legal frameworks, services, resources, and access constraints, focusing on international and national laws, ministries’ roles, and NGO partnerships. Interviews and focus groups explore opinions on reporting mechanisms and service accessibility, shedding light on cultural acceptance and knowledge gaps. Recommendations include capacity building and better response mechanisms.
E N D
Background • Diakonia in Iraq/Kurdistan since 1994 • Operating 3 centers for social protection/child protection • Improve capacities and respect for child protection
Assessment in two phases • 1) A child protection systems assessment covering legislation, procedures and needs for capacity building • 2) How to improve the quality of work performed by the three centers
Iraq/Kurdistan • Federal entity since 2005 • Population almost 4 million • 36% 0-14 years, 4% above 63 • More than 50% are under 20 years
Child protection systems assessment in Iraq/Kurdistan • Legal framework • Coordination mechanisms • Available services • Human and financial resources • Children’s and parents’ access to service
Constraints and limitations • Not possible to visit services providers • Not enough interviews with civil society • Not possible to meet with extremely vulnerable children • Sample group of children and parents came from Dohuk • Lack of reliable statistics
International legal framework • The CRC (1994) • The ILO Conventions 138 and 182 (1985 and 2001) • Not party to the two Optional Protocols of the CRC • Not party to the Conventions on the Status of Refugees or Statelessness
National legal frameworkThe Iraqi Constitution (2005) endorses the CRC • State and family the main duty bearers • Economic exploitation prohibited • All forms of violence and abuse in the family, school and society prohibited • All forms of psychological and physical torture prohibited
A Kurdistan Child Rights Law in process • With UNICEF support • Currently children’s rights and responsibilities are defined in the Juvenile Law, the Social Law and the Labour Law.
Interviews Ministries of • Labour and Social Affairs (and general directorate in Dohuk) • Interiors • Justice • Education • Health (and general directorate in Dohuk) Five NGOs (partners of Diakonia) Parents and children (in Dohuk)
UNICEF • Study on VAC • Develop internal policies for law encorcement • Support Child Helplines • Mine risk education, psychosocial support
Questionnaire for ministries • The definition of child protection • The legal framework • The services provided in terms of prevention, detection, reporting and response • The coordination • The human resources
MoLSAExample of matrixWhat are the services provided? Who provides them?
MoLSA • Juvenile law: ”Prevent the phenomena of juvenile offense by protecting the juvenile from delinquency” • The social law: nothing but 2 small references to children with disabilities • The child labour law
Directorate of Social Care and Development: • Special care (”orphanages”) • Centers for children at risk of delinquency (street children) • No detection of children in need of social support • No reporting mechanism • Plan to establish Help-lines (with support from UNICEF) Directorate of Labour • No programme to address child labour Directorate of Reformatory: • In charge of institutions for children in conflict with the law in close collaboration with Ministry of Interior
Ministry of Interiors • Protects the population from crime and terrorism • Juvenile Police stations detect children in conflict with the law or children at risk of delinquency • Child protection is a family matter • Need for capacity building on how to talk to and interrogate minors
Ministry of Justice • Juvenile courts – minimum age 11 If sentenced • Juvenile reformatory If delinquent • Rehabilitation centers • Parents risk to loose custody
Ministry of Education • Law prohibiting physical and phsycological punishment • Law on free and compulsory education • No mechanism for detection, response or referral
Ministry of Health • No protocol for detection, reporting and assistance – doctors are prohibited • Children not allowed to go to the hospital without parent • Need for capacity building on how to talk to children, help them overcome traumas
Focus group discussions • Fathers (10) • Mothers (36) • Boys (19) • Girls (8) Children aged between 4 and17
Discussions focused on: • Definition of child protection • national and international law • access to and opinion about available reporting mechanism • access to and opinion about responsive services
Example of matrix • Do you use these reporting mechanisms? • Which specific cases of violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation you think should be reported?
Fathers • Concerned about protection in school • Law against domestic violence is humiliating and increase divorce rate • Better to address root causes by teaching children about non-violence
Mothers • Aware of law, but limited knowledge • VAC is culturally accepted and mothers are the main perpetrators • If a child is punished in school he/she deserves it • Protection issues in the home cannot be reported
Children • Not aware of a law on child protection but some had heard of the CRC • All aware of the juvenile law • All had been subject to physical punishment in school - report to parents • Most violence takes place between children
Summary • Violence against children is a family affair • The system in place is a child correction system • Children are perceived as perpetrators not victims of rights violations • Protection is ”education, health, food”
Summary cont… • Reporting and referral mechanism do not exist – only for the detection and response of children in conflict with the law • Lack of specialised staff on child protection within MoLSA • General lack of capacity to understand child protection and knowledge about the law
Summary cont… • Lack of disaggregated data • Lack of awareness among parents and children on children’s rights, the negative impact of violence, alternative discipline, how to prevent exposure to risks • Insufficient coordination
Reflections • Did we ask the right questions? • What were the traditional protection mechanisms? • The current law reinforces the current belief • The ocean of preventive measures