1 / 17

GLAST LAT Tracker Tower-4/5 Pre-Ship Review

GLAST LAT Tracker Tower-4/5 Pre-Ship Review. Luca.latronico@pi.infn.it INFN-Pisa. Tower 4 - Assembly and test highlights. Apr. 13-14, 2005 (INFN-Pisa) : assembly of complete tray stack incomplete cable set (C0,C1,C3,C5,C7) due to late arrival of complete set

acton-barlow
Download Presentation

GLAST LAT Tracker Tower-4/5 Pre-Ship Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GLAST LAT Tracker Tower-4/5 Pre-Ship Review Luca.latronico@pi.infn.it INFN-Pisa

  2. Tower 4 - Assembly and test highlights • Apr. 13-14, 2005 (INFN-Pisa) : • assembly of complete tray stack • incomplete cable set (C0,C1,C3,C5,C7) due to late arrival of complete set • CPT could not be performed w/o cables C2, C4, C6 due to a known issue with GTFE reset (see NCR/INFN/PI-417) • Apr. 18-21, 2005 (INFN-Pisa) : • Installation of late cables • Tray01 (L020) damaged during cable assembly - L023 installed in place of L020 (NCR/INFN/PI-470) • CPT • Sidewalls and alignment • Final CPT and ship to Roma • Apr. 27, 2005 (Alenia-Roma) : • VIB test • May. 23-27, 2005 (Alenia-Roma) : • TVAC test with tower 5 • May 30, 2005 (Roma) • Through customs in Roma airport • Full EIDP details at: • http://glast.pi.infn.it (soon available)

  3. Tower 4 - Assembly and components details Tower PN: LAT-DS-00722 (rev3) Tower SN: 4

  4. Tower 4 & 5 - Configuration Configuration: • Kapton tape and foam applied on the flex cables as per LAT-DS-00722 • 4 layers of Poron foam 0.037 THK used on Bottom and Top Tray (–X) side (in place of 5 layers) • Base Plate assembly: • Torque of nuts 5.1 Nm on TWR 4 • Torque of nuts 5.3 Nm on TWR 5, spec is (5.08 +0.56/-0 Nm)  higher resonance frequency detected at VIBE test

  5. Tower 4 & 5 – Alignment, CG & MASS • Tower 4 and 5 well aligned and inside stayclear • Mass and CG near estimated values (when used real masses) • Data available on INFN-PISA web site

  6. Tower 4 – Open NCRs • INFN/PI-494: Bad channels out of spec • with reference to tray NCRs 460,465,464, 463 (all closed as per MRB) layers X6, Y5, Y3, Y13 fail test TE301 as expected and due to known problems • Status of channels was monitored through TVAC test and show no significant loss of channels (see next slide), the NCR can be closed and converted into a SLAC one for reference. • INFN/PI-496: Vacuum level out of specification. • Common to Tower 5, see following slides. • INFN/PI-503: CPT reduction after TVAC • Common to Tower 5, see following slides

  7. ~ 130 disconnected channels overall (less than 0.25%). Layer X6 is stable as bad channels are due to broken PA traces Fluctuations in layers Y3 (H17-back-MCM 1117)and Y5 (H16-back-MCM 1049)are due to delaminations in the MCM encapsulant – such MCMs were out of spec (>20 bad chans) already at SLAC and their use was authorized by an MRB for schedule reasons

  8. Tower 4 - Efficiency 3 layers with efficiency < 99% as a consequence of missing channels (see previous slide) overall efficiency (pre-ship) at the tower level is 99.7% (required 98%)

  9. Tower 5 - Assembly and test highlights • May 5-9, 2005 (INFN-Pisa) : • assembly (tray stack, cables, sidewalls, alignment, turn-over) • test (CPT) • May. 23-27, 2005 (Alenia-Roma) : • TVAC test with tower 4 • VIB test • May 30, 2005 (Roma) : • Through customs in Roma airport • Full EIDP details at: • http://glast.pi.infn.it (soon available)

  10. Tower 5 - Assembly and components details Tower PN: LAT-DS-00722 (rev3) Tower SN: 5

  11. Tower 5 – Open NCRs • INFN/PI-492: Bad channels out of spec • 18 bad channels found in Pisa on X2 (9 dead, 9 disconnected) • 7 dead were known from ladders • nb of dead channels was stably 7 during TVAC; a fluctuation in the Pisa measurement determined the 9 dead channels initially recorded • Status of channels was monitored through TVAC test and show no loss of channels (see next slide), the NCR can be closed. • INFN/PI-496: Vacuum level out of specification. • Common to Tower 4, see following slides. • INFN/PI-504: CPT reduction after TVAC • Common to Tower 5, see following slides

  12. ~ 45 disconnected channels overall (~0.08%). • All layers within specs, i.e. nb of bad chans <16, and stable • new MCM encapsulant deposition, new MCM-PA gluing fixture, new shipping box are working!

  13. Tower 5 - Efficiency worst layer is 99.4% overall efficiency (pre-ship) is 99.7%

  14. EGSE/TVAC – Communication problems with 2 towers • Relevant NCR: • INFN/PI-474 • Problem: • Some instabilities in the EGSE systems for TVAC made it impossible to operate towers 1 and 3 during TVAC test, and the EGSE systems had to be operated independently • Action taken (as per dispositions): • TVAC chamber setup was improvedby using separate feed-through for EGSE-power lines and chamber temperature control • GASU cables connecting to the TEMs were shielded • Findings • TVAC test of towers 4 and 5 was run with 2 systems in parallel, the NCR can be closed

  15. Tower 4 and 5 – Vacuum level out of spec • Relevant NCR: • INFN/PI-458, INFN/PI-459 • Description: • The vacuum level was mostly outspec during the test (specs call for 5E-5 torr) • Observations (see annex for details): • P ~ 3.15E-5 torr at room T after 90 hours of pumping • correlation between T-P • no improvement after hot soak as observed with towers 1 and 3 • new material (MLI) that did not undergo bake-out was introduced for thermal blanket of tower 4 and EGSE RF shield • The proposed disposition is use as is.

  16. CPT reduction for TVAC • Reference NCR • 503 and 504 • Description • TE101 (leakage current and power consumption test) not performed after towers 4 and 5 TVAC test • Proposed dispositions • only perform test TE101 after TVAC is anomalies are detected in the tower CPT suite • Rationale: correct behaviour of tower during and after TVAC is assessed by observations of layers noise, channels status, CR detection efficiency • reduce CR data taking time to 100k events for CPT and 50K for LPT • Rationale: such statistics are enough for efficiency measurements and the test time reduction allow compressing TVAC in 3 days • Submit a document change request with the above changes

  17. Tower 4 and 5 - Conclusions • Both towers well aligned and within stayclear • The overall number of disconnected channels is very low • All the silicon layers (but the bottom tray of tower 3) close to 100% efficiency • Communication issue during TVAC solved • Vacuum level still outspec during TVAC

More Related