1 / 7

TRANSCOM Metrics Analysis of Velocity Performance LTC William Farmer 618-220-6645

TRANSCOM Metrics Analysis of Velocity Performance LTC William Farmer 618-220-6645 William.farmer@ustranscom.mil. Agenda. Performance Dashboard Global Distribution LRT Performance Global Distribution Transportation Segment Performance Significant Impeding Factors

adara
Download Presentation

TRANSCOM Metrics Analysis of Velocity Performance LTC William Farmer 618-220-6645

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TRANSCOM Metrics Analysis of Velocity Performance LTC William Farmer 618-220-6645 William.farmer@ustranscom.mil

  2. Agenda • Performance Dashboard • Global Distribution LRT Performance • Global Distribution Transportation Segment Performance • Significant Impeding Factors • USTRANSCOM J5/4 Led Projects

  3. JDDE Metrics Dashboard (December 2012 Data)

  4. Global Distribution Performance 1Q FY11 – 1Q FY13 Logistics Response Time (LRT) CENTCOM EUCOM AFRICOM (15% of Total Volume ) (4% of Total Volume) (<1 % of Total Volume) PACOM SOUTHCOM NORTHCOM (11% of Total Volume) (<1 % of Total Volume) (71 % of Total Volume) *Measured from Document Date to Customer Receipt (without backorders) Includes DLA, GSA, and Planned DVD Sources % >=85% % 50-69% <50% % 70-84% %

  5. Global Distribution Performance 1Q FY11 – 1Q FY13 Transporter Segment CENTCOM EUCOM AFRICOM (24% of Total Volume ) (5% of Total Volume) (<1 % of Total Volume) PACOM SOUTHCOM NORTHCOM (16% of Total Volume) (<1 % of Total Volume) (55 % of Total Volume) *Measured from Document Date to Customer Receipt (without backorders) Includes DLA, GSA, and Planned DVD Sources % >=85% % 50-69% <50% % 70-84% %

  6. Significant Impeding Factors • Interest in velocity improvement • Lack of incentive alignment (sub-optimization) • Fiscal constraints impacting source segment • Focus on efficiency – increasing utilization of transportation assets negatively impacts velocity • Planned DVD data support (pipeline review committee)

  7. TRANSCOM J5/4 Led Projects • Distribution performance reviews • Provide COCOMs with DoDAAC performance • Publishing seven (7) dashboards for the JDDE • CENTCOM carrier selection to Kuwait • $15 cheaper per container but 22 days longer • Incorporating truck utilization/schedules along with source of fill analysis • SNO analysis support • Retrograde analysis for possible flow through CCP • Probability Distribution Functions and cost per pound analysis • Expected Delivery Date (EDD) project • Contract carrier performance vs compliance analysis • Impact of Next Generation Cargo Capability (NGCC) mission/pallet utilization vs velocity • Feasibility to automate and incorporate cost based decision support methodology • Improving visibility analysis focused on organizational handoffs • Revision of Time Definite Delivery standards – conference in 2013

More Related