1 / 36

Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning

Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning. James D. Myers Erin A. Campbell-Stone & James E. McClurg Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Wyoming. Physical Geology: GEOL1100. 180-200 students per semester traditional lecture-lab one lecture section

Download Presentation

Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using a Classroom Response System (CPS) to Improve Student Learning James D. Myers Erin A. Campbell-Stone & James E. McClurg Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Wyoming

  2. Physical Geology: GEOL1100 • 180-200 students per semester • traditional lecture-lab • one lecture section • 10-13 lab sections with < 20 students • low student attendance/involvement • instructor, full-time lab coordinator, 4-5 TAs

  3. Physical Geology - Redesign • integrate reading-lab-lecture • three-week integrated learning module • extensive use of technology • lectures reorganized to combine variety of educational techniques • lab incorporates: group learning, hands-on, reading assignments • reading assignments mandatory

  4. Physical Geology – Learning Modules • consists of: • week 1: reading questionnaire • week 2: lab activities • week 3: lecture • different modules overlap • single week do parts of three different modules • each concentrates on different subject

  5. Physical Geology – Learning Modules

  6. Physical Geology – Reading Questionnaires • introduces topics • done individually • submitted online • insures background preparation done

  7. Physical Geology – Lab • uses • collaborative learning • hands-on activity • strong web component • virtual experiments • multimedia

  8. Physical Geology – Lab • each lab group has work station with dedicated, networked computer

  9. Physical Geology – Lecture • final component of learning module • follows first two components • student applies their new knowledge • variety of goals • relies heavily on Web site • lecture format varied • introduced limited active learning sessions

  10. Physical Geology – Lecture Changes • some changed from passive to active learning environment • increased student-instructor and student-student interaction during lecture • provided limited formative assessment • engaged a larger percentage of the students in lecture – not just the “responders”

  11. Physical Geology – Lecture Outcome • student involvement grew during semester • improved performance on exams for students attending lecture

  12. Physical Geology – Lecture Limitations • many students still not engaged • active learning only small percentage of lecture sessions • lots of added administrative work • formative assessment limited • real-time monitoring of student learning limited

  13. Solution: Classroom Response Systems • record and analyze student response in real time • Classroom Response System from eInstruction • two modes: bookstore, standalone • student key pads with receiver – infra-red system

  14. CPS Demonstration • do quick demonstration

  15. Lecture: Enhancing with CPS • better in class feedback on student learning • ability to “chunk” lectures more effectively • reduction of administrative tasks and paper collection • permanent quantitative record of student performance • more focused assessment of effectiveness

  16. Lecture - Types • expository: typical lecture • enhanced: mini-lectures separated by active learning (CPS) tasks • focused: active learning class session focused on single concept/technique

  17. Lecture - Expository • instructor talks, students listen • passive environment • benefits • low “risk” for students • provides breather • easy fall back position

  18. Lecture - Expository • introduce ourselves • describe regional, national or international geologic events • discuss local, state or national policy issues related to geology • cover information/topic not in textbook • tie current events to subject

  19. Lecture – Expository w/ CPS • uses CPS for: • opinion surveys • knowledge assessment • benefits • no right/wrong answer • provides attendance data • refocuses students without “risk” on their part • http://www.gg.uwyo.edu/geol1100

  20. Lecture – Enhanced: Details • series of mini-lectures separated by activities • activities occupy only 5-10 minutes • refocus attention • combine formative assessment (feedback) and/or active learning exercises • done individually or in pairs/groups • type of activity varied

  21. Lecture – Enhanced: Timeline http://www.gg.uwyo.edu/geol1100

  22. Lecture - Focused • focused on a single concept/technique • employs multiple active learning tasks • think-pair-share always important • a worksheet is completed individually and turned in • occupies entire class period • maximum of one focused lecture per subject topic

  23. Lectures – Enhanced w/ CPS • mini-lectures separated by active learning tasks • tasks use CPS • topic: groundwater • timeline • Mini-lecture: The Water Table • Quick-Thinks (CPS) • Mini-lecture: Aquifers and Aquicludes • ConcepTest – Artesian Wells (CPS)

  24. Lecture – Focused: Functions • summation: used to wrap up a topic, e.g. structural geology • extension: introduces concept not previously covered in reading, lab or lecture • application: applies previously learned principles/concepts to new situation

  25. Lectures – Focused: Example • topic: structural geology • function: summation • timeline • introduction • terminology review (CPS) • vertical motion problem • map details quiz (CPS) • map exercise • core-information exercise • wrap-up (CPS) http://www.gg.uwyo.edu/geol1100

  26. CPS Results: Changes • lots of more preparation time – 2-3x • less content covered • content presented in greater depth • better chance students will retain the information (hope) • teaching style must be adjusted • flexible, spontaneous • have to “re-educate” students • not used to working in lecture • attitude your are not teaching them – they are getting short changed • tell them up-front why you are making these changes

  27. CPS Results: Formative Assessment • done early in semester (2/19)

  28. CPS Results: Summative Assessment • conducted at end of semester (5/9)

  29. CPS Results: Class Attendance

  30. CPS Results: Adjustments • reduce grace period to one week • increase attendance points (5 to 20) • emphasize academic dishonesty • permanent log for sign-ins

  31. CPS Results: Recommendations • equip all large classrooms in classroom building • encourage adoption by other instructors - particularly of large classes • explore ways of supporting faculty adopting CPS

  32. Suggestions: Implementation • alternate CPS function (polls, opinions, learning activities, assessment) • credit participation not accuracy (no risk) • vary question difficulty • limit each CPS session to < 5 questions • have a back-up plan (technology & content) • if for points, have a sign-in sheet • don’t ignore results • useful to monitor attendance

  33. Suggestions: Getting Started • plan ahead • provide student grace period • conduct technology assistance sessions • contact bookstore early (for bookstore model only) • practice before hand • technology & style • instructor & students

  34. Suggestions: Classroom Environment • instructor flexibility essential • class “out” of control • class size dictates applications • students more involved/animated • greater understanding of less material • formative/summative assessment

  35. Suggestions: Potential Problems • technology glitches • key pad vulnerability • complaints about cost • potential for cheating

  36. Summary • active learning makes lecture time more effective • engages student’s brain • keeps them focused on task • breaks monotony • students need to “adjust” lecture behavior • CPS improves the delivery and effectiveness of active learning • ensures all students participate • provides quantitative formative & summative assessment • reduces administrative overhead • CPS is just a tool. Its effectiveness is determined by how well you wield that tool

More Related