170 likes | 438 Views
Restorative Justice within the Juvenile Diversion Programme Sergeant Andy Tuite Garda National Juvenile Office IYJS conference 6 th and 7 th March 2007. Juvenile Diversion Programme. 2001 Act placed Diversion Programme on statutory basis
E N D
Restorative Justicewithin the Juvenile Diversion Programme Sergeant Andy TuiteGarda National Juvenile OfficeIYJS conference6th and 7th March 2007
Juvenile Diversion Programme 2001 Act placed Diversion Programme on statutory basis • Created the position of Director of Diversion Programme (Garda Superintendent) • Juvenile Liaison Officer (J.L.O.) now has statutory functions • Introduced the concept of Restorative Justice into the Juvenile Justice system Restorative Cautions (S26) Restorative Conference (S29)
The Diversion Programme • S18 - Every child shall be considered for admission to the diversion programme (Amended by S.123 Criminal Justice Act 2006 to include behaving Anti-Socially) • Criteria for admission to Diversion Programme - accept responsibility for behaviour - 10 yrs and under 18 -consent • The Diversion Programme is a means of dealing with children who offend in a manner other than by way of prosecution and is designed to divert the child from the courts and away from further offending.
2 types of Restorative Intervention • Section 26 – Restorative Caution allowing for the presence of a victim when a formal caution is being administered. The victims presence is not an essential ingredient for the event to be restorative. • Section 29 – Garda Conference – bringing together family and relatives as well as agencies to formulate an action plan for the child – ‘persons concerned with the child’s welfare’
Children Act, 2001 Training Requirement • Restorative Justice: training to facilitate conferences. Not mandatory but required to allow for restorative intervention. • Mediation: Training mandatory under Section 25 of the act so that JLO can administer a formal caution. • Victim Awareness: Allowing for better understanding of victims needs.
Training outcomes • IIRP Real Justice Training – to use scripted format to facilitate restorative conference. • Mediation training allowed for intervention between people to resolve a dispute or bring about reconciliation.
Training outcomes • Within the restorative conference mediation allowed for departure from script to explore ‘issues’ • Victims were treated with better understanding and officers were aware of proper use of language when approaching victims
Restorative Process • Referral arrives at the National Juvenile Office • Director/JLO recommends “explore” restorative caution • First person to consider/discuss with is the offender • If positive discuss with victim • If victim not present victims perspective represented by surrogate such as victim support, family member, Garda or a letter. • Event preparation
Role of JLO • Home JLO; in area where child lives explores the options and sets up the meeting – this officer will be supervising the child • Away JLO; chairs the meeting – is neutral
Restorative meeting • Venue; halls, churches, Garda Station, schools, hotel • Room lay out and seating • Arrivals • Water and tissues • Refreshments • Breakout rooms • Departure plan
Meeting process • Introduction and ground rules • Offender speaks first • Victim • Offenders support • Victim support • Discussion • Agreement • Plan
Types of Cases • Public Order • Robbery • Assault • Harassment • Supply of drugs • Criminal Damage • Burglary • No case should prove to be beyond us
Distinguishing features of The Garda Model • Protection from double jeopardy. The decision has already been made to caution • Confidentiality of proceedings • Specially trained personnel • Intervention occurs early • High level of training – restorative justice facilitator skills, mediation skills and victim awareness. • Monitoring committee appointed • Victim needs given consideration as well as offender • Offender accountability
Evaluation Restorative Justice Programme • Pilot Programme 68 cases 1999-Aug 2001 • New evaluation of 147 cases from May 2002-December 2003 (O’Dwyer)
Preliminary findings • Over 93% victim satisfaction • J.L.O. very positive – better way • Investigating Garda – very positive • Child who offended - Not an easy option • Re-offending rates: 1 in 3 re-offended • Garda Model had evolved
Thank You Sergeant Andy Tuite Garda National Juvenile Office Harcourt Square Dublin 2.