1 / 8

FINLAND SOER 2015, Inspire, Information sharing

FINLAND SOER 2015, Inspire, Information sharing. Tapani Säynätkari Finnish Environment Institute (FEI) 30.11.2013. SOER 2015/Part C. The aim is to survive No significant enthusiasm within FEI due to policy regarding SOER and indicators Finland participates SENSE3

aden
Download Presentation

FINLAND SOER 2015, Inspire, Information sharing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FINLANDSOER 2015, Inspire, Information sharing Tapani Säynätkari Finnish Environment Institute (FEI)30.11.2013

  2. SOER 2015/Part C • The aim is to survive • No significant enthusiasm within FEI due to policy regarding SOER and indicators • Finland participates SENSE3 • National results foreseen but not guaranteed • Lack of resources (quantitatively) • Participation in SENSE2 not very successful

  3. Inspire • Inspire is taken care by National Land Survey under the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry • Connection between EEA NFP and Inspire activities vague • Connection between Finnish Environment Institute and Inspire strong • Many of Inspire themes environment related and taken care by FEI/Geoinformatics (GEO) • GEO participates also in Inspire working groups etc. • GEO created a metadata service for FEI • Hopefully Inspire is capable to be an important building block in future development of data/information sharing (=SEIS implementation?)

  4. Is there a superior way to develop data and information sharing?

  5. How about SEIS? • SEIS principles still rather valid • Practical implementation of SEIS has been quite slow • To define and implement a complex transition is time and resource consuming as has been seen with e.g. Inspire

  6. Anyhow still towards SEIS? • A stepwise implementation is needed • Pros: • Tasks with limited thematic scope are easier to work with • Smaller workloads at a time • Learning by doing • Cons: • Slower progress • Earlier solutions may be difficult or impossible to implement at later stages • A comprehensive framework/guidance is also needed to guarantee the long-term coherency

  7. Towards SEIS – what makes it happen? • Obligatoriness • Binding Community acts redefining the reporting • No SEIS directive or Regulation is foreseen • National needs and expectations must also be taken into account • Building blocks • Inspire as far as suitable • Structured Information and Implementation Frameworks (SIIFs) • Knowledgeand experience gained so far

  8. Thank you!

More Related