1 / 26

Year One Outcomes Assessment of a Masters Suturing and Knot Tying Program for Surgical Interns

Matthew Schill, BS, Debbie Tiemann, RN, Mary Klingensmith, MD, L. Michael Brunt, MD Department of Surgery and Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO.

Download Presentation

Year One Outcomes Assessment of a Masters Suturing and Knot Tying Program for Surgical Interns

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Matthew Schill, BS, Debbie Tiemann, RN, Mary Klingensmith, MD, L. Michael Brunt, MD Department of Surgery and Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO Year One Outcomes Assessment of a Masters Suturing and Knot Tying Program for Surgical Interns

  2. Disclosures • Matthew Schill: • No relevant financial interests • L. Michael Brunt, MD: • MIS Fellowship Grant Support: • Ethicon Endosurgery • Honorarium/Speaking: • Lifecell Corp

  3. Background • Simulation is increasingly important in surgical education • Surgical residents may suffer in skills acquisition for many reasons: • Work hour restrictions • OR time constraints • Patient safety concerns • Increasing complexity of surgical patients and surgical technology

  4. Background • Basic suturing and knot tying are essential for surgical skills development • Technical skills of incoming PGY-1 residents may vary widely due to prior experiences • Suturing and knot tying skills sessions are commonly taught but without further formal instruction, specified practice or assessment • Development of these skills progresses primarily along a Halstedian model of training in the OR

  5. Background • Since 2001 our Department has held an introductory suturing and knot tying skills session for beginning surgical interns • In 2009, we restructured this program to include further instruction, defined goals and proficiency targets, and assessment of performance • Goal to develop cohort of trainees who have undergone the same training and performance template (“Masters” Program)

  6. Hypothesis • Feedback, remediation and further practice would be necessary to meet the desired performance levels

  7. Specific Aims • Describe elements of this “Masters” program • Report year one outcomes data • Correlate skills performance with conventional performance measures (case volumes, intern rotation evaluations, and ABSITE scores)

  8. Masters Program Structure:Skills Training Template • 2-hour skills training session • Lecture and hands-on • Materials for practice • Suture pad and tying board • Instrument set • Online videos available for self-study • Follow-up skills training session at 2.5 months

  9. Tasks • Suturing tasks: • Simple interrupted • Subcuticular • Vertical mattress • Tying tasks: • One-handed • Two-handed • Tie on a pass

  10. Assessment • Timed and video taped technical performance (TP) of six tasks • Pre-course, 4 months post-course and thereafter as needed • All videos reviewed and scored by one senior surgeon (LMB) blinded to the intern using OSATS format

  11. Masters Program Structure

  12. Other Performance Measures • Case numbers at 4 and 10 months • Technical skill comments from resident rotation evaluations graded on 1-5 scale • ABSITE scores PGY-1 year

  13. Participants • 9 surgical interns (8 categorical and 1 non-designated) at Washington University Medical Center participated in the program • 6 end of PGY-2 Categorical General Surgery residents were assessed for comparison • Washington University School of Medicine Human Studies Committee approved protocol

  14. Data Analysis • All data are mean ± SD • Statistical analysis: • Task completion time: ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc tests • Technical proficiency: Kruskal-Wallis test • Comparison with other measures: Pearson correlation • p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant

  15. Results: Demographics • Mean age: 27 ± 2.4 years • Gender: male – 6, female – 3 • Handedness: right – 8, left – 1 • None had participated in an intern preparedness skills course as 4th year medical students

  16. Suturing Task Times * * *

  17. Tying Task Times * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.001 relative to baseline * ** **

  18. Total Combined Task Time * *p < 0.001 vs baseline 8½ minutes!

  19. Suturing Technical Proficiency * * p < 0.05 vs baseline *

  20. Tying Technical Proficiency * p < 0.05 vs baseline * * *

  21. Time to Proficiency • All interns reached proficiency targets on 6/6 tasks • Mean time to proficiency: 10.1 months (4-12 months) • Mean # assessments post-training: 2.4 (range 1-3) • Proficiency rates at 4 mos: • Suturing tasks: 44-55% • Tying tasks: 11-22% • Only one intern proficient on all 6 tasks at 4 month assessment

  22. Conventional Performance Measures • Case counts at 4 and 10 months, and ABSITE did not correlate with time or TP • Coded rotation comments pertaining to technical skills were inversely correlated with total combined task time (not TP scores)

  23. Study Limitations • Small sample size • Absence of control intern group • Technical proficiency assessment by one evaluator • Impact on operative technical performance unknown

  24. Summary • Feedback, remediation, and repetitive practice are necessary for surgical interns to reach proficiency levels on basic suturing and knot tying tasks • Performance levels on these fundamentals upon completion of this program are comparable to that of end of R-2 year residents • Most traditional measures of intern performance correlate poorly with formal technical skills assessment

  25. Conclusions • Proficiency based training and objective assessment of performance should be more widely utilized early in residency training for these fundamental surgical skills

  26. Acknowledgements • M Schill was supported by NIH grant T35 DK074375-05

More Related