230 likes | 315 Views
3. Screening. Amine Ouazad Microeconomics C. Career Choices. A real estate broker wishes to hire an agent. He posts a job offer. Initially, the dealer was offering 50,000 euros a year, fixed. What was/were the problem? The compensation is as follows:
E N D
3. Screening Amine Ouazad Microeconomics C
Career Choices • A real estate broker wishes to hire an agent. He posts a job offer. • Initially, the dealer was offering 50,000 euros a year, fixed. What was/were the problem? • The compensation is as follows: • The salesman gets 1% of all sales, and an additional fixed wage of 30,000 euros. • The average price of a house in the area is 150,000 euros. • Who accepts the offer?
Push a little further • What is the optimal contract? • The real estate broker is greedy:max Revenue – Wage. • The productive candidate has options:Wage >= productive broker’s outside option. • The unproductive candidate has (worse) options:Wage >= unproductive broker’s outside option. • What is the optimal wage contract, assuming it is a fixed percentage + a flat wage?
Outline • Asymmetric information on the labor market (done) • Screening car rental customers:Explicit price discrimination • Screening airline customers:Implicit price discrimination • Screening eclectic and obsessive customers:Bundling
P High valuation customers P Lower valuation customers Optimal price “A key step is to avoid uniform pricing. Pricing to specific customer groups should reflect the true competitive value of what is being provided. No money is left on the table...” A. Miles, Pricing, Boston Consulting Group. MC MC Variable profit “No money is left on the table” Variable profit Demand Demand MR Q Q Uniform Pricing Perfect Price Discrimination
2. Explicit Price Discrimination Segment the market by observable characteristics. Charge customers in different segments different prices, according to their elasticity. • Condition #1: Market Power • Must have ability to set prices • Condition #2: Observability (No deception) • Use an easily observed trait which is correlated with elasticity of demand. • Customer cannot masquerade as someone else. • Condition #3: No arbitrage/resale • Customers from one segment cannot sell good to others.
Explicit Price Discrimination- Condition #2: Observability • Tourists pay more for kilims in Istanbul than locals. • Students get discounts on air/rail tickets. • Californians pay $97; non-Californians pay $151 for a 2-day park hopper • Dell Inspiron 580, Base Configuration: Home:$749 Small Business: $899 • Victoria’s secret?
Railroad freight pricing U.S. railroads charge 1.5-2 times as much to move coal as they do to move grain MC = $10 per ton; 90 Coal PC = 90 - 10 QC Grain PG= 60 - 5 QG 60 PC PG 10 MC MRC MRG MRG = 60-10QG = 10 = MC QG=5; PG = $35 MRC = 90-20QC = 10 = MC QC = 4 PC = $50 Higher choke price → Less Elastic → Higher price
Outline • Asymmetric information on the labor market • Screening car rental customers:Explicit price discrimination • Screening airline customers:Implicit price discrimination • Screening eclectic and obsessive customers:Bundling
2. Implicit Price Discrimination The Mother of All Discriminatory Pricing: Airline Pricing • Airlines like to segment the market based on valuations, but valuations are not observed • On the other hand, valuations are correlated with time sensitivity • In general consumers with higher valuation are less likely to accept: • Saturday night stay • A 14-day advance ticketing ,..etc. • Solution: Create a product line based on artificial restrictions. • These simply annoy the customers, and have little or no bearing on their cost of operation
Screening with Differentiated Products Scenario: Airline has Bbusiness customers and Lleisure customers. Cost per ticket = $ 300 (Same for restricted and unrestricted tickets) – Explicit Market Segmentation –
Pricing of Only Unrestricted Tickets Option 1: Charge $1000 and sell only to Business travelers Profit = (1000-300)*B = 700B Option 2: Charge $600 and sell to both Business and Leisure Profit = (600-300)*(B + L) = 300 (B + L)
Screening with Restricted & Unrestricted Tickets Option 3: Charge $900 and sell unrestricted tickets to Business travelers Charge $500 and sell restricted tickets to Leisure travelers Profit = (900-300)*B + (500-300)L = 600B + 200L This is Screening or Implicit Market Segmentation
Comparison of 3 Options (A) sell only unrestricted tickets at a price of ___________ to business travelers only; Profit: (B) sell only unrestricted tickets at a price of ____________ to all travelers; Profit: (C) sell unrestricted tickets to business travelers for ____________ and restricted tickets to leisure travelers for __________. Profit:
Wrap Up • Even if you cannot explicitly segment the market don’t lose heart – implicitly segment the market! • Offer a menu of options and try to come up with a creative screening mechanism • Try product differentiation, versioning, inter-temporal pricing, damaging, bundling (see this next time) – these achieve price discrimination
Outline • Asymmetric information on the labor market • Screening car rental customers:Explicit price discrimination • Screening airline customers:Implicit price discrimination • Screening eclectic and obsessive customers:Bundling
Bundling • Selling several goods in one bundle • Hardware and software • Software suites • Sports/Concert tickets • Auto accessories
Exercise 6.6: Screening via Bundling Pricing of a two-concert mini season (Wagner and Harbison) at a theater. Highly segmented, with only three types of customers: A customer may go to one or both of the concerts.
– Benchmark: Explicit Market Segmentation – – No Bundling –
– Pure Bundling – – Mixed Bundling – The Genius of Dell??