1 / 29

Unit 4: Cabinet Government and Political Parties

Unit 4: Cabinet Government and Political Parties . Readings: Norton CH 4 and 5 Dunleavy CH 3 and 4. Guiding Questions . What constitutes “the government” in the British system? What is the role of the Prime Minister? The Cabinet? Does Parliament “matter”?

adina
Download Presentation

Unit 4: Cabinet Government and Political Parties

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Unit 4: Cabinet Government and Political Parties Readings: Norton CH 4 and 5 Dunleavy CH 3 and 4

  2. Guiding Questions • What constitutes “the government” in the British system? • What is the role of the Prime Minister? The Cabinet? • Does Parliament “matter”? • What are the major political parties in the UK? • How has the party system affected policy?

  3. The British Executive Branch • The legislative functions of the British system are vested in parliament. • The executive functions of the system are vested in the government. • Executive includes: the PM, Cabinet, support staff and civil servants/bureaucracy. • Whitehall-location of executive agencies. • 10 Downing Street-Residence of the PM.

  4. The British Prime Minister • Current PM: Gordon Brown • High visibility enhances position within party and parliament. • 1) Selects the Cabinet • “First among equals”. • Position not created by statute; created by convention. • 2) Winning elections. • 3) Media campaigning. • 4) Maintain confidence of party. • 5) Perform well in parliament. • 6) Balance domestic and international politics. • Performance/emphasis has varied amongst PMs.

  5. Cabinet • Consists of senior ministers chosen from either the Commons or the Lords. • Serves at the pleasure of the Prime Minister • Decisions have been increasingly centralized in PM’s office. • Once a decision is reached, all must support it publicly. • Ministers responsible for day-to-day functioning.

  6. Does Parliament Matter? • Halisham (1976): Coins the idea of the British executive as an “elected dictatorship” • Lawmaking functions are becoming increasingly dominated by the government rather than parliament. • Elected government is expected to pass the legislation listed in its manifesto. • But oversight functions of Parliament are reduced as members wanting to join cabinet have incentives to toe the party line. • Ability to vote “no confidence” exists; rarely used successfully • Callaghan was the last PM to lose a vote of confidence.

  7. Does Parliament Matter? • Governments control the parliamentary timetable. • Nearly all bills need government support for passage. • Private members bills are very difficult to enact. • Governments have a lot of tools to enact their legislation. • 1) Generally have a parliamentary majority • 2) Appoint committee members on the basis of loyalty • 3) Can use the guillotine procedure in the Commons to speed up debate • 4) Ministers and whips can pressure MPs to overturn wrecking amendments; they have “carrots and sticks” at their disposal.

  8. Does Parliament Matter? • Commons oversight capability lackluster until the 1970’s • Oversight reform evolving. • 1) Select committees created to scrutinize how policies are implemented • 2) National Audit Office examines how public funds are spent • 3) Joint Committee on delegated legislation oversees statutory instruments. • Time constraints, party loyalty incentives, and small budgets hamper effective oversight. • Expertise of Lords often used as a basis for oversight • Standing committees on EU, technology, and delegated legislation. • Lords also suffers from a lack of resources; staffing and office needs are very limited.

  9. Political Parties and Parliamentarism • Party discipline is higher in the UK (and other parliamentary systems) then it is in presidential systems. • Key given the confidence relationship. • Nationally, there are “two and a half” dominant parties: • Labourand the Conservatives(Tories).and the Liberal Democrats. • New parties are springing up but not winning seats in the national Parliament. • BNP, UKIP, Respect • Nationalist parties are strong in Wales (PC) and in Scotland (SNP). • Northern Ireland has its own party system.

  10. Political Parties as Organizations • Political parties seek members to assist with campaigns, provide support, and fund party activities. • Party membership is declining across the board. • Membership dues are declining. • Party members are likely to be more ideologically driven than the mass electorate. • Both Labour and the Conservatives have struggled to balance support within their party with maintaining the support of the electorate.

  11. Center-Left: Labour • Eclipsed Liberals in early 1900’s. • Draws support from the working classes. • Historically, “socialist” in ideology. • party drifted towards the center under Blair. • Rejection of commitment to nationalization critical for making the party “electable” • But this has split the party. • Classification: social democratic.

  12. Center: Liberal Democrats • Merged with the Social Democrats in 1988. • Mixture of old Liberals and disgruntled Labour members. • Attempts to coalesce with Labour at national level have come to naught. • Economically liberal; socially libertarian. • Seat share has been on the rise; electoral system disadvantages the party. • Often a protest vote; could hold the balance of power in a hung parliament. • Classification: liberal

  13. Center-Right: Conservatives • Historically, a party of the elite. • Shift to a “catch-all” party once Labourbecame electorally viable. • Economically liberal; historically socially conservative. • Leadership under David Cameron makes a return to government conceivable for the first time since 1992. • Social conservatism weakened under current leadership. • Classification: conservative

  14. The Nationalists: SNP and PC • SNP: Scottish Nationalist • PC: Plaid Cymru • Economically and socially left of center. • Both call for creation of a separate state • Although these calls are stronger in Scotland. • Have played a critical role in devolved institutions • Limited effect at the national level.

  15. Party Politics in Northern Ireland • DUP/UUP: represent Protestant (Loyalist) voters. • DUP is more extreme. • Both are center/center-right. • SDLP/SF: represent Catholic (Nationalist) voters. • SF is more extreme. • Both are center/center-left • SF and the DUP are on the rise • Moderate parties have lost some ground.

  16. The British Party System and Governance • Stage One (1945-1979): Consensus politics • Labour and Conservatives accepted expanded social welfare system and an interventionist state in the economy. • Stage Two (1979-1997): Return to politics • Thatcherism marked a return to a divided left and right. • Stage Three (1997-present): Convergence Politics • Blairism accepts some goals of Thatcherism; Conservatives accept some goals of Blairism.

  17. Stage One: Creating a Postwar Consensus • 1945: First Labour government elected. • Manifesto based on consensus created during interwar era to • 1) provide social security (BeveridgeReport) • 2) promote full employment • 3) reform of the educational system. • 1945-1948: National health care established. • 1948: National Health Service established.

  18. Stage One: Maintaining the Postwar Consensus • Keynesian economic model adopted. • Use monetary policy to promote full employment. • Management of economy rather than nationalization. • 1951: Conservatives elected. • Did not end consensus. • Accepted expanded welfare state and Keynesianism.

  19. Stage One: Extending Consensus • 1951-1964 Conservatives maintained and expanded these programs without increasing taxes. • 1960’s associated with decline in empire and an economic downturn, but living standards continued to rise. • Minor tweaks needed to maintain the NHS • State began to charge for prescriptions to maintain NHS. • Parties continued to agree on ends but differed over the meansto achieving said ends.

  20. Stage Two: End of Consensus • The 1970’s brought economic instability. • 1974-1979 saw several switches in governments in response to economic decline. • Hung parliaments coupled with continued political unrest and instability empowered the extremes in both parties. • 1979: Thatcher’s Conservatives elected • End of consensus

  21. Stage Two: Thatcherism • No nonsense approach to policymaking. • TINA: “There is no alternative” • 1) Reduce money supply to reduce inflation • 2) Undermine deals over wage increases with government employees and trade unions. • 3) Reduce the public sector and encourage free market economy (privatization). • 4) Free labor by weakening trade unions. • 5) Restore law and order. • Return to “values”

  22. Stage Two: Thatcher’s Out • Thatcher wins big in 1983 and 1987 • Labour is not seen as viable. • 1990: After 11 years, support for Thatcher was waning both within her party and within the electorate. • The poll tax proved to be Thatcher’s undoing within the electorate. • Vow to “go on and on” fostered a revolt within the party. • Inability to obtain a win in the first round of a leadership election led to her ouster. • John Major becomes PM; continues privatization, but changes his relationship with the Cabinet. • Less “heavy handed” than Thatcher.

  23. Stage Two: The Road to Blairism • Labour drifted leftwards under the Thatcher government. • Was trounced in 1979, 1983, and 1987. • Remained committed to nationalization • Seen as both anti EU and anti US. • Was ahead in the polls in 1992, but Tories pulled out a win. • Loss in 1992 led to re-examination of policies.

  24. Stage Three: Blair and New Labour • Blair and Brown both discuss running for the Labour leadership. • “Agreement” between the two that Blair will lead first and then turn over to Brown will motivate the Blair/Brown relationship. • Tony Blair becomes leader of the Labour party in 1994. • Electability key to winning the leadership. • Sought to moderate Labour’s position on nationalization. • Triangulation (placing New Labour in between Conservatives and Old Labour) was a double edged sword.

  25. Stage Three: Blairism and Convergence • Economics: promote financial stability and low inflation. • Favors state activity in society (i.e. state role in health care and education): Old Labour. • But allow for individual choice: New Labour. • Shift towards “quasi-federalism” via devolution. • Pro US/EU policy. • A shift from previous Labour leadership. • Conservatives under Cameron have accepted many of these ideas.

  26. Blatcherism? SIMILARITIES DIFFERENCES • 1) Similar relationships with Cabinet. • Decisions made before consulting with entire cabinet. • 2) Support of free market mechanisms. • 3) Continue reduced role for unions. • 4) Foreign policy similar regarding US. • 1) Blair declared support for universal health care, • Thatcher wanted to reduce the state’s role. • 2) Blair favored devolution; Thatcher favored centralization. • 3) Foreign policy differed over EU. • Thatcher opposed deepening, Blair more supportive. • 4) Stress on traditional values differs across governments.

  27. Evaluating Blairism • New Labour as “Post Thatcherite and social democratic” • Made Labour electable, but… • Unclear Blair has transformed his party (but then again, neither did Thatcher). • Does not share the same feelings towards Labour as Brown. • Blair is more instinctively Liberal; Brown is more instinctively Labour. • Devolution and support for free market probably solid under Brown; both supported by the Conservatives. • Continued convergence likely in the short term.

  28. Conclusions • National politics is still dominated by Labour and the Conservatives even though many contend their politics are converging. • The possibility of a “hung parliament” boosts interest in the Liberal Democrats. • New political parties are rising within the electorate; the electoral system for Parliament all but shuts these parties out in Westminster. • Differing electoral systems for the European Parliament and devolved institutions give these parties a voice in European and regional institutions.

  29. Next Unit • Theme: Campaigns and Elections • Readings: • Norton CH 7 and Dunleavy CH 1 and 5 • Finish Archer

More Related