Strategies and Activities Utilized for D&D in the U.S. and Other Countries

1. Strategies and Activities Utilized for D&D in the U.S. and Other Countries AtomEco Intrernational Conference, Moscow October 2012

2. Fluor Corporation Overview Fluor is one of the world’s leading publicly traded engineering, procurement, construction, maintenance, and project management companies 2011 Revenue: $23.4 billion 2011 New Awards: $26.9 billion Current Backlog: $39.5 billion International: 75% #124 in the FORTUNE 500 in 2011 Over 1,000projects annually, serving more than 600 clients in 66different countries Offices in 28 countries on 6continents Energy & Chemicals Power Global Services Government Industrial & Infrastructure Revenue by Business Segment • Celebrating 100years in 2012 • Workforce of over 42,000men and women executing projects globally

3. Fluor’s Diversified Businesses Government Energy & Chemicals Global Services Industrial & Infrastructure Power • Chemicals • Downstream • Offshore Solutions • Upstream • ICA Fluor • Alternative Power • Commercial &Institutional • Healthcare • Life Sciences • Manufacturing • Mining & Metals • Telecom • Transportation • Water • Nuclear Decommissioning • Logistics & Construction • Contingency Operations • Services • Clients: • DOD • DOE • DHS • DOL • NASA • UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority • Solid-Fueled • Gas-Fueled/IGCC • Renewable Energy • Commercial Nuclear • EnvironmentalCompliance • Power Services • Operations &Maintenance • Construction Equipment & Tools • Staffing 2

4. Fluor’s Safety Performance Total Case Incident Rate (TRIR) based on more that 250 million hours worked 3

5. Nuclear Decommissioning • K Basin Spent Nuclear Fuel & Sludge Removal Project – U.S. DOE, Hanford 1996-2006 • Portsmouth Decommissioning Project – U.S. DOE, Ohio 2011-Present 5 sample projects: • Fernald Environmental Remediation Project – U.S. DOE Ohio 1998-2007 • Savannah River Nuclear Site (SRS) – U.S. DOE, South Carolina 2008-Present • International Remediation Projects – U.K. and Russia, 2004-2008 Workers using video equipment at K-Basins, DOE Hanford, Washington

6. Hanford K-Basins – High Hazard Project 95 percent of the radioactivity in Hanford’s reactor area - Over 2.11 million kilograms of deteriorated and damaged fuel removed, washed, dried, containerized, and stored - Approximately 2.0 x 106 TBq Hanford Site - 1517 km2

7. Hanford Project - K Reactor Fuel Basins Highly corroded metal uranium fuels in a canister Highly radioactive fuel and debris handling tool Disintegrated fuel in containers 105,000 fuel assemblies covered with miscellaneous contaminated debris

8. 2000 Hanford Project - K Basin – Challenges Met K-Basins as it appeared in 2000 2007 135.4 metric tons of debris, racks and canisters removed from K-Basin Six engineered containers of sludge (46 m3) in K-Basins while awaiting transfer & treatment

9. Hanford Project Management - Sludge Transfer Booster Station and Hose Transferred approximately 38 m3 of highly radioactive sludge from engineered containers in K East to engineered containers in K West via approximately 0.8 km long hose-in-hose system with 4 booster pump stations

10. Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant D&D D&D of 415 buildings at Portsmouth Gas Diffusion Plant formally used to enrich uranium hexafluoride (UF6) • Fluor is responsible for performing the decontamination and demolition (D&D) of three massive uranium enrichment process buildings – each covering more than 12-hectares • 10-year, $2.1 billion contract awarded in 2011 • 1,600+ employees • 1,500-hectare site • Fluor is providing economic development advisors to bring new industry to the depressed Portsmouth region 9

11. Fernald Environmental Remediation Project Converted a 425-hectare U.S. DOE Fernald Uranium Processing Complex to a Nature Reserve DOE Fernald site, Ohio United States Two silos and processing facilities Reduced original clean-up schedule by 12 years and project cost by US $7.8 billion (original schedule was 27 years and $12.2 billion). Dismantled over 300 buildings, including 250 radiologically-contaminated buildings and structures. Excavated and shipped 1 million tons of waste from 6 waste pits. Removed 31 million pounds of uranium product Disposed of 2.0 million cubic meters of contaminated soil, including shipping 1.4 million cubic meters off site. Remediated a 90-hectare uranium-contaminated groundwater plume.

12. Sellafield – Resource Enhancement Contract Contract with British Nuclear Group (BNG) 2-year contract focused on improving cleanup and decommissioning. Scope approx. $400 million/year out of $1.2 billion Site budget. Seconded 24 Senior Fluor employees into site management team Head of B30 ponds Head of low-level disposal facility Head of project controls Reduced Site Lifetime Plan costs by several hundred million dollars and accelerated baseline schedules Resource Enhancement contract to improve cleanup and decommissioning performance Sellafield Site

13. Sellafield -B30 Sludge Inventory 350 tons of degraded fuel 1,204m3 sludge inventory 1,234 containers in the pond

14. Northern Dimension Environmental Partnership, Russia Project funded by European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) and managed by Russian Academy of Sciences, Nuclear Safety Institute. Fluor specialists were fully integrated into project teams and worked hand in hand with Russian experts. Introduced best practice processes used for strategic planning. Provided Russia with program management expertise and lessons learned from U.S. nuclear decommissioning projects Multi-purpose Submarine being dismantled Andreeva Bay, Murmansk Region

15. Management Objectives for Decommissioning Four critical project management elements assure that project objectives are SAFELY met • Technical Scope — Ensuring defined technical objectives are achieved • Accelerating Schedule — Ensuring work is constantly brought forward • Reducing Costs — Ensuring non-project costs are driven down or eliminated • Risk Management — Ensuring project risks are identified and managed