240 likes | 684 Views
Education YES! Updates and Plans. Michigan Department of EducationOffice of Educational Assessment and AccountabilityOffice of School ImprovementNovember - 2006. 6/16/2012. 3. School Improvement Framework. Purposes of the School Improvement FrameworkProvide a common frame for continuous schoo
E N D
1. 6/17/2012 1 Michigan Requirements PA-25 School Improvement
Annual Report
Core Curriculum
Accreditation – Ed YES!
2. Education YES! Updates and Plans Michigan Department of Education
Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability
Office of School Improvement
November - 2006
Education YES is Michigan’s school accreditation system. It is a new system designed to meet the needs of the 21st century.Education YES is Michigan’s school accreditation system. It is a new system designed to meet the needs of the 21st century.
3. 6/17/2012 3 School Improvement Framework Purposes of the School Improvement Framework
Provide a common frame for continuous school improvement
Provide a common vocabulary regarding school improvement
Provide new, research-based indicators for Education YES! (School Leadership That Works- ASCD)
4. 6/17/2012 4 School Improvement Framework 39 Evidence Bearing Indicators
All 5 Strands
Strand 1: 11 Indicators
Strand 2: 10 Indicators
Strand 3: 6 Indicators
Strand 4: 5 Indicators
Strand 5: 7 Indicators
5. 6/17/2012 5 School Improvement Framework
6. 6/17/2012 6 Education YES! This is the big picture, showing all of the pieces of the system. It includes both indicators of school performance and measures of student achievement. The indicators come from research and best practice. They are critical for establishing a fair system for Michigan school accountability. They may be seen as investments in improved learning.This is the big picture, showing all of the pieces of the system. It includes both indicators of school performance and measures of student achievement. The indicators come from research and best practice. They are critical for establishing a fair system for Michigan school accountability. They may be seen as investments in improved learning.
7. 6/17/2012 7 Indicators 2002-2006
8. 6/17/2012 8 SI Framework Structure
9. 6/17/2012 9 The SI Framework
10. 6/17/2012 10
11. 6/17/2012 11 Benchmarks
12. 6/17/2012 12 Education YES! Plans 2006-07 Statewide Pilot
Indicators based on School Improvement Framework
Display External Data
Display “Extra Credit”
Plan revisions for student achievement
13. 6/17/2012 13 Education YES! Plans 2007-08 Revised School Report Card
Credit for reporting self-rating, evidence and Action Plan
External Data part of Ed YES
“Extra Credit”
Student Progress as part of student achievement
14. 6/17/2012 14 Indicators of School Performance Rubrics developed based on the School Improvement Framework
90 rubrics were pilot tested in the spring of 2006
2006-07 reporting based on the new rubrics
39 rubrics have been selected for reporting in 2006-07 by all schools
All rubrics are available for school use
15. 6/17/2012 15 Sample Characteristic Strand 1: Teaching for Learning
Standard 3: Assessment
Benchmark A: Aligned to Curriculum and Instruction
Characteristic/Key Attribute 3. Multiple Measures
Staff members view student assessment in the broad sense as an on-going process that includes aligned standardized assessments, daily informal assessments, periodic benchmark assessments as well as a variety of culminating assessments.
16. 6/17/2012 16 Sample Self-Rating
17. 6/17/2012 17 Sample Evidence Most teachers rely on an array of assessments to determine student achievement, i.e. classroom –based tests, MEAP, student portfolios and writing samples.
Formal assessments are sometimes aligned to curriculum. Assessments being used are changing so this will improve.
Data review meetings for all staff held monthly.
Team meetings to review grade level data held weekly.
Assessments used:
MEAP 3-8
Textbook pre/post tests
Scantron grades 3-8
Terra Nova K-2
Teacher-created assessments
Dibels
Harcourt Assessment
IOWA
18. 6/17/2012 18 Suggested Data Sources
19. 6/17/2012 19 Scoring Indicators 2006-07 Schools will get “credit” for completing the self-rating and evidence
School must report some text in the evidence for all reported characteristics
Scoring methods will be documented prior to data collection
Little penalty for “Partially Implemented” and “Getting Started”
20. 6/17/2012 20 External Data 2006-07 All Levels
Percent Highly Qualified Teachers
Student Attendance Rate
Parent Teacher Conference Attendance
Instructional Staff turnover rate
Percent of staff involved in Professional Development
Percent of new teachers mentored
Years of experience based on date of hire
Percent of teachers working under permit
21. 6/17/2012 21 External Data 2006-07 Elementary
District offers school readiness program
Middle Schools
Percent of students taking Algebra 1
High Schools
Graduation and Dropout Rates
Advanced Placement and Dual Enrollment
Percent Participating
Percent Taking and Percent Passing AP exams
22. 6/17/2012 22 Possible “Extra Credit” Additional Data Collection and Use
Surveys of parents, staff, students
Peer Review
Program Distinction
Limit on effect of “Extra Credit” for Grade and Score
23. 6/17/2012 23 Education YES Plans 2006-07 is a Statewide Pilot
2007-08
Link self-rating and evidence to Action Plan
Additional External Data
“Extra Credit”
Student Progress related to Achievement Status
24. 6/17/2012 24 Contact Information Paul Bielawski
Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability
Michigan Department of Education
PO Box 30008
Lansing, MI 48909
(517) 335-5784
bielawp@michigan.gov