1 / 17

Re evaluating the Categorization of HIV Progression in Subjects Based on CD4 T cell Decline Rates

Re evaluating the Categorization of HIV Progression in Subjects Based on CD4 T cell Decline Rates. Angela Garibaldi & Ryan Willhite Loyola Marymount University BIOL 398-01/S10 March 2, 2010. Outline.

adora
Download Presentation

Re evaluating the Categorization of HIV Progression in Subjects Based on CD4 T cell Decline Rates

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Re evaluating the Categorization of HIV Progression in Subjects Based on CD4 T cell Decline Rates Angela Garibaldi & Ryan Willhite Loyola Marymount University BIOL 398-01/S10 March 2, 2010

  2. Outline • Review of the Markham method of labeling compared with CD4 T cell decline rate categorization of progressors. • Selection Process • Prediction • Statistical Approach • Results • Discussion/ Comparison to More Recent Studies • References

  3. Categorizing Progressors by CD4 T cell Count • Patterns of HIV-1 evolution in individuals with differing rates if CD4 T cell decline • Rapid Progressors • Fewer than 200 CD4 T cells, within 2 years of seroconversion • Moderate Progressors • CD4 T cell levels 200-650 during 4 year period • Non-progressors • CD4 T cell levels above 650

  4. Selecting Subjects to Analyze

  5. Selecting Subject Clones • Selected the most recent visits that had sequenced clones.(Many had 0 clones for last 3+ visits) • Utilized only “Distinct Sequences”

  6. What we predict… • Subj. 6 (Moderate Test) and 13 (Non-Progressor) will be less divergent and have less diversity than when 6 is compared to another Moderate (5,7) • Subj. 7 (Moderate Test) and 10 (Rapid-Progressor) will be less divergent and have less diversity than when 7 is compared to another Moderate (5,6) • Subj. 6 and 7 will be more divergent and have higher diversity in comparison to values generated in the above.

  7. Statistical Approach • Utilized BedRock • Conduct Clustdist multiple sequence alignment for comparison and frequency values used to : • Calculate • ''S'' • ''Theta” to measure Divergence • ''Minimum'' and ''Maximum” • S/Number of clones to interpret Diversity

  8. Results

  9. Divergence • Min. and Max. values show that 6 and 10 are most divergent • Considers Frequencies

  10. Divergence using Theta Values

  11. Diversity shows a clearer picture • Diversity similarities between (6,5) & (13,5)

  12. Revisiting the Results • Divergence does not prove to be an accurate method of categorizing • Theta did not deliver insight • Diversity levels are similar in certain categories

  13. Implications of using CD4 Tcell Decline Rate to Categorize • This method is • Better than Markham’s method of categorization • Especially in categorizing moderates from rapids • Not as successful • without a larger sample size • Not much success in comparing all • In the future • Find a way to calculate the significance • A larger sample size • Use a program that would allow a comparison with higher number of clones • Few clones available from subjects may complicate the reliability. • Focus on most recent visits and acquire clones for these visits

  14. More Recent Study • Nucleotide and amino acid mutations in humanimmunodeficiency virus corresponding to CD4+ decline M. D. Hill and W. Hern´andez Ponce School of Medicine, Ponce, Puerto Rico • Published online January 3, 2006 _c Springer-Verlag 2006

  15. Comparing our findings to more recent studies • Change in diversity of nucleotide sequences among HIV forms within individuals as their CD4+ counts progressed • There is a trend for the average distance to increase with dropping CD4+ values • Among all progressors, 94.1% of subjects demonstrated increased diversity • The rapid progressors had a statistically significant higher loop charge • Four of the rapid progressors had T-tropism

  16. How Does this Compare?… • Found that progression is easier to evaluate than non-progression in terms of diversity • The moderate and rapid progressor were most divergent • Therefore there is an accumulation of differences over a period of time • Perhaps there needs to be further investigation in: • RNA and DNA sequences • A closer look at regions described in paper such as loop charge

  17. References • Markham RB, Wang WC, Weisstein AE, Wang Z, Munoz A, Templeton A, Margolick J, Vlahov D, Quinn T, Farzadegan H, and Yu XF. Patterns of HIV-1 evolution in individuals with differing rates of CD4 T cell decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 Oct 13; 95(21) 12568-73. pmid:9770526. • Hill MD and Hern�ndez W. Nucleotide and amino acid mutations in human immunodeficiency virus corresponding to CD4+ decline. Arch Virol 2006 Jun; 151(6) 1149-58. doi:10.1007/s00705-005-0693-8 pmid:16385396. PubMed HubMed PubGet [Paper1] • HIV project handout for statistical analysis info

More Related