220 likes | 238 Views
Real-time Estimation of Accident Likelihood for Safety Enhancement. Jun Oh, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Western Michigan University March 14, 2007. Background / Motivation. Is it possible to predict occurrence of accidents? Maybe NOT. / Almost impossible
E N D
Real-time Estimation of Accident Likelihood for Safety Enhancement Jun Oh, Ph.D., PE, PTOEWestern Michigan UniversityMarch 14, 2007
Background / Motivation • Is it possible to predict occurrence of accidents? • Maybe NOT. / Almost impossible • Are there certain traffic conditions that lead to more accidents? • Maybe YES. • Then, is it possible to identify such traffic conditions? • What will be possible indicators?
Contents • Previous Studies • Traffic Dynamics and Accident • Empirical Example • Accident Likelihood Estimation • Issues on Accident Study • Advanced Surveillance System
So far, previous studies... • Analyzed long term historical data • To identify relationships between traffic variables or geometric elements and accidents • off-line studies • Incident detection and incident traffic management • after-incident
Objectives • To enhance traffic safety under ITS • To identify traffic conditions leading to more accidents • Real time • Before accident • To estimate accident likelihood
Occurrence of Traffic Accidents Traffic Dynamics Environment Driver Characteristics Accident Vehicle Characteristics
Accident Indicator Accident occurs Implication starts Traffic Dynamics (Indicator) Normal traffic condition Disruptive traffic condition T-x T TIME
Empirical Example • Freeway traffic data • I-880, California • Volume, Occupancy, and Speed (double-loop) • 10-second periods from upstream detector stations • Accident profiles (52 accidents) • Traffic Variables • Occupancy, Flow, and Speed • 5 minute Mean and STD
Pattern Classification • Two traffic conditions • Normal traffic condition: a 5-minute period apart from traffic accident (more than 30 minutes apart) • Disruptive traffic condition: a 5-minute period right before an accident • Non-parametric density estimation • kernel smoothing technique • Best indicator: STD of speed
Bayesian Model for Accident Likelihood • P(A/X) = Posterior probability that given traffic measurement belongs to traffic conditions leading to an accident occurrence • P(A) = Prior probability that given traffic measurement belongs to disruptive traffic condition • P(N) = Prior probability that given traffic measurement belongs to normal traffic conditions
Identification of Accidents • The percentage of time when P(A/X) was above the given threshold
GIS Database for Enhanced System • Traffic Accident Data Mapping • Linear Referencing & Dynamic Segmentation • Reconstruction of highway segments • Detector location and accident location • Other Characteristics • Weather • Highway Geometry • Real-time Traffic Data
Database Example Real-time Traffic Data Accident location and type
Drive safely Caution! Traffic Unstable Possible Application Framework Real-time traffic measurement with highway geometry and weather Real-time estimation of accident likelihood Is traffic condition stable? Yes No Provide safety information at upstream via VMS
Issues on Accident Study • Accident data availability and accuracy • Need more data • Accurate accident occurrence time • Accident duration • Other measures? • Wide-area detection • Individual vehicle tracking • Need better surveillance systems
An Advanced Surveillance System • Present traffic surveillance systems • mostly use inductive loop detectors (ILDs) • have significant limitations (e.g. point estimates) and errors • reduce the ability to effectively manage and control freeway and arterial traffic systems, and to implement ATMIS • Advanced sensor systems • Integration of weather and surface sensors • Individual vehicle detection for details • Vehicle reidentification techniquesutilizing existing and future infrastructure
Matching Inductive Vehicle Signatures Vehicle Reidentification • Volume • Occupancy • Speed • Vehicle Types • Section Density • Section Delay • Travel Time • Level of service • Lane-by-lane travel time • Lane changing pattern
Concluding Comments • Speed variance can be a good surrogate • Traffic dynamics reflects hazardous factors • Temporal spatial speed variation • Advanced surveillance systems may provide better exposure • Lane-by-lane travel time • Lane-changing pattern • Possible to identify traffic conditions leading to more accidents (Accident Likelihood) • Integration of traffic, weather, and geometry information
Thank you Q & A Jun Oh jun.oh@wmich.edu